How Dividend Investors Can Pick the Right Companies
Yahoo! Finance: Top Stories / 2023-03-03 16:401


Investors have been gravitating toward dividend-paying stocks and the mutual funds and exchange-traded funds that buy them. They're betting that if the stock market has another rocky year, it will pay to own stocks that are at least throwing off dividends.

The question is which companies investors can rely on to keep paying dividends.

During the pandemic, just under 200 companies stopped paying dividends to save cash. Over the past three years, many of them have resumed dividend payments—but some haven't, and according to the latest Global Dividend Index from Janus Henderson, overall dividend growth is expected to slow to 2.3% in 2023.

Now, even as the economy continues to emerge from the worst of the pandemic disruptions, persistent inflation and higher interest rates are stressing companies' balance sheets, which can discourage dividend payments. A handful of companies have recently announced plans to cut their dividends.

Max Wasserman, founder and senior portfolio manager at Chicago-based Miramar Capital, says that many of the indefinite pauses and recent cuts to dividends are a result of poor capital-allocation strategies.

"What you're seeing are companies that have increased their payout ratio to such a high extent that any interruption in their business model has put their dividends in jeopardy," Mr. Wasserman says. "Some companies have been stretching their balance sheets to remain dividend 'aristocrats' or to stay on the radar of mutual funds and dividend investors, and it's hit their cash flows. With higher debt costs, inflation and uncertainty, they've made the decision to cut the dividend in response."

Antonio DeSpirito, lead portfolio manager of the BlackRock Equity Dividend portfolios, says the timing of a dividend cut can tell investors about the underlying health of a company. "Work that we have done on this shows that if a business is making an out-of-business-cycle cut, that can be a sign of danger. That usually means there's some long-term secondary issue at a company. The stock is less likely to recover," he says. "If you see a business cut during a downturn, there is a better chance that stock is going to recover."

Look for sustainability
So, what should dividend investors look for in a company? R. Burns McKinney, managing director and senior portfolio manager at Dallas-based NFJ Investment Group, says investors should look at cash flow alongside the company's dividend. It can be tempting to look for the biggest dividends or the highest dividend yields, but cash flow is a metric of sustainability, he says.

Are you bullish on dividend stocks? Why or why not? Join the conversation below.

"The best dividend companies are the ones that have thought it through and have a philosophy behind what they are doing with their dividend," he says. "This should be rooted in current cash flow and their expectations for business growth over time."

Both Messrs. McKinney and Wasserman argue that high-quality dividend payers should raise dividends meaningfully year over year, ideally keeping pace with inflation. Capital-allocation strategies should also account for the possibility of an economic slowdown or recession, they say. For 2023, both expect that high-quality dividend payers will increase payouts despite the pressure on corporate balance sheets from inflation and debt costs.

"The increases may not be sky high," Mr. Wasserman says. "If a company has been raising the dividend by 5%, you might see them do 3% this year. But we expect to see increases, if that's the path they have been on."

A variety of strategies
For fund investors, dividend funds could provide some protection in the current market environment, says Daniel Sotiroff, a senior analyst at Morningstar Research Services, a unit of Morningstar Inc. "When you are focused on companies that are growing the dividend, that tends to mean that these are highly profitable companies. Investing in them can be a defensive investment in times of uncertainty," he says. Last year, dividend funds were down 6.68% on average, compared with a 19.4% decline in the S&P 500 index, according to Morningstar.

Investors can pursue several different strategies with dividend funds. There are funds with a broad scope, such as Invesco Dividend Income Fund (FSTUX), which invests across sectors, in companies including longtime dividend payers like Johnson & Johnson and Bank of America Corp. It has an expense ratio of 0.66%.

Dividend-yield funds invest in companies that pay dividends at a higher rate than a specified benchmark index. Aniket Ullal, head of ETF data and analytics at CFRA Research, says these funds give investors the option of taking more of a sector view, as many of them invest primarily in one or two sectors.

Vanguard offers a dividend-appreciation strategy, through its Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The fund tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, which includes only companies with a record of increasing their dividends. The fund holds all of the stocks in the index and has an expense ratio of 0.06%.

"Each of these strategies are going to play different roles in a portfolio," Mr. Ullal says. "There can be a trade-off when you focus on yields, because you increase the concentration risk in a portfolio. Each investor will have to decide if that is worth it to them."

Ms. McCann is a writer in New York. She can be reached at reports@wsj.com.

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Enclosures

01d4a5e17e3dd79125f37eca204370e7

Enviado do meu Galaxy

How Russia's War On Ukraine Is Altering Global Crude Oil Trade
por OilPrice.com

Oilprice.com / 2023-03-03 17:045


The conflict between Ukraine and Russia has disrupted crude tanker flows.
Midsize crude tankers have benefited from the disruption, leading to higher profits.
The ban on seaborne imports from Russia has caused an unusual transport pattern for U.S. crude exports.
The Ukraine-Russia war has rerouted crude tanker flows over the past year, equating to higher profits for shipowners. But the upside is not evenly spread. Midsize crude tankers have been the big beneficiaries.

It's not only that Russian crude export terminals can't handle larger tankers. A highly unusual transport pattern for U.S. crude exports has emerged, creating another war-induced headwind for owners of larger tonnage.

VLCCs cannibalize trans-Atlantic trade

Prior to the war, U.S. crude exports to Europe were loaded aboard midsize Aframaxes (tankers with capacity of 750,000 barrels) and Suezmaxes (1 million barrels). U.S. crude exports to Asia were loaded aboard very large crude carriers (VLCCs; 2 million barrels).

Europe hiked its crude imports from the U.S. in the wake of the invasion, replacing seaborne imports from Russia, which have been banned since Dec. 5.

Much of Europe's incremental volume from the U.S. has moved aboard VLCCs, not midsize tankers — a transport model that was extremely rare before Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 

"Virtually all the additional [U.S.] sales to Europe were done on VLCCs," wrote Erik Broekhuizen, manager of marine research at Poten & Partners, in a report Friday.

Tanker demand is measured in ton-miles: volume multiplied by distance. If ships switch to shorter routes, it's a negative for demand, and thus, for spot rates.

VLCCs have "cannibalized" the shorter-haul U.S.-Europe business of Aframaxes and Suezmaxes. Simultaneously, China has increased imports from Russia, limiting Chinese demand for longer-haul U.S. exports. Both are negative for VLCC voyage distance.

"The problem is that more VLCCs are arriving in the Atlantic than leaving," said ship brokerage BRS on Monday. "The latest data suggests that 108 VLCCs are currently trading west of Suez and that more are arriving every day, making the Atlantic crude tanker market more competitive.

"Preliminary information suggests that the number of VLCCs transporting U.S. crude to Europe could hit a record over the coming weeks," BRS said.

VLCCs now 'world's largest shuttle tankers'
Changes in crude trade patterns since the war "have benefited the midsize sectors given that the main Russian load ports in the Baltic, the Black Sea and the Far East are all inaccessible to VLCCs," explained Kevin Mackay, CEO of Teekay Tankers (NYSE: TNK), during a conference call Thursday.

Clarksons Securities estimated Monday that spot rates of non-eco-designed VLCCs were $59,700 per day. That's a highly profitable rate, but Suezmaxes — with half the carrying capacity of VLCCs — were earning $65,600 per day.

"VLCCs are now regularly cannibalizing multiple cargoes that would usually be transported on two Suezmaxes or three Aframaxes," said BRS, noting that VLCCs are more competitive than midsized tankers on a dollar-per-ton basis.

Consequently, VLCCs have become "the world's largest shuttle tankers," BRS said.

Lars Barstad, CEO of Frontline (NYSE: FRO), said during a conference call Tuesday, "With the situation around oil being redirected from Russia, you're basically seeing both Aframaxes and Suezmaxes getting drawn into that trade. That's giving VLCCs an opportunity to enter [midsize tanker] markets.

"VLCCs have started trading Suezmax stems [cargoes]. So right now, you're seeing a high number of fixtures where VLCCs are stepping in to what you'd typically call a Suezmax trade — U.S. Gulf to UK Continent [Europe], for example. Various asset classes are eating into each other's business segments."

More 'reverse lightering' in US Gulf
U.S. Gulf ports do not have the water depth to accommodate fully loaded VLCCs. Instead, these cargoes are "reverse lightered." They are loaded first on Aframaxes or Suezmaxes, with the oil then moved to VLCCs via ship-to-ship transfers.

"Since the cannibalization trend arrived in mid-2022, charterers have become better at utilizing infrastructure in the U.S. Gulf," explained BRS. "[They are] part-loading in ports and booking reverse lightering in advance to more efficiently load VLCCs."

BRS also pointed out the increased use of VLCCs for shorter-haul shipments to Europe is tying up more Aframaxes and Suezmaxes in reverse-lightering duties in the U.S. Gulf, another plus for midsize tanker rates.

China favoring Russian crude over US crude
The U.S.-China crude trade, because of its extreme distance, is a key variable in global VLCC demand. It takes seven weeks to travel from the U.S. to China via the Cape of Good Hope at 13 knots.

According to BRS, "Long-haul U.S. crude exports remained relatively flat year on year [in 2022], which, when viewed in the context of the surge in total U.S. crude exports, was viewed as disappointing, especially by VLCC owners."

U.S. crude shipments to China averaged around 200,000 barrels per day last year, in line with 2021 volumes. They have remained at the same level in the first two months of this year.

"Considering the backdrop of steadily rising Chinese crude runs, this suggests that U.S. barrels have been losing out to soaring imports of cut-price Russian barrels," said BRS. (Crude shipments from Russia to China are mainly shipped aboard the so-called "shadow fleet," comprising vessels with opaque ownership that do not trade in Western markets.)

Broekhuizen of Poten is optimistic on U.S.-China crude flows in the remainder of this year. "We expect more crude exports from the U.S. Gulf in 2023, [and] we anticipate that less of the incremental barrels will go to Europe," he said. "This means that more crude may find its way to Asia, especially to China.

"For the VLCC markets, this means more tonnage will likely be employed on the long-haul routes to Asia, boosting ton-mile demand and freight rates. As a result, we expect VLCCs will become less competitive in the trans-Atlantic trade and Suezmaxes and Aframaxes will regain market share."

Earnings roundup
On Tuesday, Frontline reported net income of $240.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2022 versus $19.8 million in Q4 2021. Adjusted earnings of 97 cents per share came in below the consensus estimate of $1.08. The latest period was Frontline's best quarter since Q2 2008.

Frontline owns VLCCs, Suezmaxes, Aframaxes and product tankers. Its spot VLCCs earned an average of $63,200 per day in Q4 2022, nearly four times rates a year ago. The company has 87% of its available VLCC days booked for Q1 2023 at $58,300 per day.

Also on Tuesday, International Seaways reported net income of $218.4 million for Q4 2022 compared to a loss of $34 million in Q4 2021. Adjusted earnings of $4.21 per share came in much higher than the consensus forecast for $3.92. The latest period was the best quarter since the company's listing in 2016.

International Seaway's owns a fleet of VLCCs, Suezmaxes, Aframaxes and product tankers. Its spot VLCCs earned an average of $64,596 per day in the latest quarter, compared to $14,326 per day the year before. It has 83% of its available spot VLCCs days for Q1 2023 booked at $46,600 per day.

By Greg Miller of FreightWaves via Zerohedge.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Explainer: Biotech corn and soy widely used, consumers still wary of GM wheat
por Reuters

Investing.com: Stock Market News / 2023-03-03 19:095


© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: An agricultural worker operates a tractor with a seeder to sow wheat on farmland in Comodoro Py, on the outskirts of Buenos Aires, Argentina June 21, 2022. Picture taken June 21, 2022. REUTERS/Matias Baglietto
By Julie Ingwersen

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Nearly all corn and soybean acres in the world's largest exporting countries are seeded with genetically modified varieties, but that is not the case for wheat, a crop grown primarily for human food.

Biotech varieties of corn and soy, used for animal feed, biofuels and ingredients like cooking oil, were introduced in 1996 and soon came to dominate plantings in the United States as well as Brazil and Argentina, the world's top suppliers.

But genetically modified wheat has never been grown for commercial purposes due to consumer fears that allergens or toxicities could emerge in a staple used worldwide for bread, pasta and pastries.

Now, growing concerns about a possible global food crisis being triggered by climate change and war in Ukraine may be chipping away at opposition.

Argentine biotech company Bioceres is shaking up the status quo by developing wheat genetically modified to better tolerate drought, positioning itself ahead of larger global companies that are still steering clear.

Brazil has become the second country in the world after Argentina to approve the cultivation of genetically modified wheat, after a request from a Bioceres partner.

Because wheat is traded in a global marketplace, the threat of trade disruptions due to GM fears can be significant, as U.S. and Canadian wheat growers know well.

Two decades ago, Monsanto (NYSE:) Co was working to commercialize wheat bred to withstand treatments of its weed-killer Roundup, but the company halted that effort in 2004. International buyers had threatened to boycott U.S. wheat if the product was introduced to the marketplace. Monsanto was purchased by Bayer AG (ETR:) in 2018.

Monsanto's experimental wheat was supposed to have been destroyed or stored securely. However, small patches of Roundup-resistant wheat plants emerged years later in several U.S. states, including Oregon in 2013, Montana in 2014 and Washington in 2016 and 2019 as well as Canada's Alberta province in 2017.

The findings prompted importers, including Japan and South Korea, to suspend imports of North American wheat until they could confirm that no unapproved strains had entered commercial channels.

Attitudes toward genetically modified crops vary around the world. China, a top world buyer of soy and corn, allows GM crops in imported feed grains but only recently began to approve GM varieties for cultivation.

Germany, home to seed giants Bayer (OTC:) and BASF, imports GM soy. But domestic opposition to biotech crops is strong enough that these companies conduct their crop research abroad.

Australia grows and exports GM cotton and canola, and the country in May approved Bioceres' biotech wheat for use in foods.

Mexico, among the largest buyers of U.S. corn, has said it will halt GM corn imports for human consumption, but walked back a deadline to ban the corn for animal feed.

In the United States, some producers and wheat industry leaders have expressed interest in using biotechnology to boost wheat's profitability and appeal to farmers.

In the quarter-century since genetically modified corn and soybeans were introduced, overall U.S. plantings of those crops expanded by 13% and 37%, respectively, while U.S. wheat plantings fell by 37%, hitting the lowest in more than 100 years in 2020, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data.

The majority of biotech corn and soybean crops are modified for insect resistance and herbicide tolerance, traits that some wheat growers would like to access. Bioceres' drought-tolerant wheat, known as HB4, adds another element to the mix.

Recent disruptions to global wheat supplies have brought a new degree of urgency to the debate over biotech wheat.

Two trade groups, U.S. Wheat Associates and the National Association of Wheat Growers, support "the eventual commercialization" of biotech wheat, according to their websites, provided that plans are implemented to minimize market disruptions.

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Can AMD Stock Break Out as a Big Investor Takes a Stake?
Yahoo! Finance: Top Stories / 2023-03-03 21:39



Chip stocks are in focus on Friday, for more reasons than one.

First, Broadcom  (AVGO) - Get Free Report is trading to new 2023 highs as the company reported better-than-expected earnings and strong guidance.

Second, Advanced Micro Devices  (AMD) - Get Free Report is in focus as Dan Loeb's Third Point reportedly has a passive stake in the firm.

While we've seen a lot of activist noise in stocks like Salesforce  (CRM) - Get Free Report, that doesn't appear to be the case with Loeb and AMD.

Don't Miss: Salesforce Stock Rips on Earnings. Here's the Trade

But the stock certainly enjoyed an afternoon rally on Thursday when Loeb's position was reported..

AMD stock promptly rallied almost 5% from before the news broke into the close. Of course, it helped that the S&P 500 also enjoyed a nice rally into yesterday's close.

As we look at AMD stock now, the stock is up 1% on the day. Could a larger breakout be brewing?

Trading AMD Stock

Daily chart of Advanced Micro Devices stock.

Chart courtesy of TrendSpider.com

Above is the daily chart, which I want to use to highlight some of the smaller levels before turning our attention to the weekly chart below.

Notice on the daily chart how AMD has given up almost all its post-earnings gains, yet found support in the $76.50 to $78 area, which was pre-earnings resistance?

Don't Miss: Will Snowflake Stock Keep Melting? Here's Where Key Support Is

That type of action is constructive, as it gives buyers clarity on the company's recent quarter, yet provides a dip to buy on a better risk/reward proposition.


Weekly chart of Advanced Micro Devices stock.

Chart courtesy of TrendSpider.com

When we zoom out to the weekly chart, the setup becomes clearer. AMD stock is putting in an inside week after a very controlled pullback down to the aforementioned $76.50 to $78 area.

In this zone, we also find the 10-week and 200-week moving averages. How convenient.

Bulls would love to see AMD stock rotate over this week's high (near $81) and make a run toward $84. If the stock makes a run back toward the recent high, $89 is in play.

Above that could trigger a much larger breakout back toward $100.

On the downside, be cognizant of the gap-fill level and 50-day moving average near $75. A break of these measures — in addition to all of those mentioned above — would create an inside-weekly-down rotation and suggests that traders use caution in the short term. 

Enclosures

31883ceab34ff9b8b0df0ded5f14a399

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Mark Zuckerberg Quietly Buries the Metaverse
por Luc Olinga

The Street: Stock Market / 2023-03-02 15:2922
The CEO of social-media giant Meta has sworn by AI, popularized by the chatbot ChatGPT.

There will be no press release, no big announcement, as he would have to acknowledge that he was wrong.

But make no mistake: Mark Zuckerberg just buried the metaverse. The metaverse is dead. 

The metaverse was supposed to be the Next Big Thing for the social-media tycoon, who in 2021 went so far as to rename his empire -- created from Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp -- as Meta Platforms. 

Simply put, the metaverse is an immersive virtual world in which we are supposed to interact with each other using specialized glasses and virtual-reality headsets. 

It was the future of technology, according to Zuckerberg, whom Tesla CEO Elon Musk dubbed "Zuck the Fourteenth" in an apparent nod to the French king Louis the XIV, famous for his hubris and excess.

Meta Creates a Top-Level AI Team
For those who doubted the company's devotion to the idea, Meta has invested billions of dollars in this massively hyped project -- to the chagrin of company shareholders.

In 2021 and 2022, Reality Labs, the division housing metaverse projects, recorded a cumulative loss of nearly $24 billion, including $13.7 billion just last year.

The losses will ease significantly in coming months because the metaverse is over.

Zuckerberg has just held the funeral by turning to the next big shiny thing, namely artificial intelligence.

"We're creating a new top-level product group at Meta focused on generative AI to turbocharge our work in this area," Zuckerberg said in a Feb. 27 post on Facebook.

"We're starting by pulling together a lot of the teams working on generative AI across the company into one group focused on building delightful experiences around this technology. ...

"In the short term, we'll focus on building creative and expressive tools," he wrote. "Over the longer term, we'll focus on developing AI personas that can help people in a variety of ways."

The legacy of the metaverse remains because Meta will continue to develop remnants of this virtual world, such as headsets, but it will be more for a target audience, such as videogamers and the crypto world.

Credit to Zuckerberg: He spares himself humiliation by surreptitiously and deftly redirecting the attention of his critics to AI, which most experts consider a true technological revolution.

The uses for consumers and businesses are indisputable: ChatGPT, the most visible expression of the AI breakthrough, has completely changed internet search. Now, we'll get human-like responses to queries. For companies, repetitive and boring tasks can now be carried out efficiently using chatbots.

The Metaverse Was a Fling
We are also getting closer to AGI, or artificial general intelligence, which means highly autonomous systems that emulate and outperform humans at most economically valuable work. 

Basically, the paradigm shift expected since the internet revolution is here. Zuckerberg understands this and has immediately pivoted.

If he is not a pioneer as often as he was, the tech tycoon still reacts very quickly to new ideas and trends. He always adapts and gives the impression that he is immediately on the trail.

Zuckerberg knows how to capture the spirit of the times. This is his strength and it allows him today to bury the metaverse on the sly.

"About 80% of our investments - a little more -- go towards the core business, what we call our family of apps, so that's Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, and the ads business associated with that. Then a little less than 20% of our investment goes towards Reality Labs," the CEO told The New York Times Dealbook conference last November.

Coincidence or not: on the same day Zuckerberg made this statement, the OpenAI startup unveiled the ChatGPT chatbot, which has completely convinced millions of consumers that AI is already part of their daily lives and will, in the future, almost dominate their interactions with tech.

From now on, don't talk about the metaverse to Zuckerberg anymore. 

It was an affair that lasted enough time for him to find a new conquest.

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Artificial intelligence is reaching behind newspaper paywalls
Economist/Business & Finance / 2023-03-02 15:336
Business | Big tech v the news
Publishers long accused tech firms of profiting from their content. Now they have a point
Mar 2nd 2023
There was big news in Canada last week—but if you were in Canada itself you may have missed it. On February 22nd it emerged that Google was blocking access to news content, in a five-week trial affecting about 4% of users in the country. The measure comes as Canada's Senate considers a bill that would force big internet companies to pay publishers for displaying links to their stories. Google says it may simply block them instead; Canada's government says the search engine's actions amount to intimidation.

It is the latest episode in a worldwide dispute between new media and old. News organisations, which in the past two decades have seen most of their advertising revenue disappear online, accuse search engines and social networks of profiting from content that is not theirs. Google and Facebook, which have come in for most of the flak, retort that they merely display links and a few lines of text, rather than articles themselves, and that by doing so they drive traffic to publishers (who in any case can opt out if they choose). Facebook estimates that it sends 1.9bn clicks a year to Canadian media, publicity it values at C$230m ($170m).

The online platforms' arguments have mostly fallen on deaf ears. Cheered on by their domestic press, governments in countries including Australia, Britain and Spain have passed or proposed laws aiming to squeeze money out of Silicon Valley and into local media companies. Australia's law, passed in 2021, prodded tech firms to make payments to Australian media reportedly worth about A$200m ($135m) in the scheme's first year.

To ward off similar legislation elsewhere, Google and Facebook have set up mechanisms for funnelling "support" to media companies. Google's "News Showcase" will spend about $1bn in 2020-23 on licensing content from more than 2,000 news organisations in more than 20 countries. Facebook's News Tab (in which The Economist has participated) does something similar, but has lately been scaled back. Unlike Google, Facebook can live without news, which makes up only 3% of what users see in their feed.

The laws have sometimes had the feel of a shakedown of the wealthy foreign tech firms by governments. But developments in the search business mean that the publishers' complaints seem increasingly justified. Search engines have been getting better at displaying information without referring visitors to external sources. Ask Google the size of Canada's population and it simply tells you that it was 38m in 2021 (followed by its usual list of suggested websites). About a quarter of desktop Google searches now end with no onward clicks, according to Semrush, an online marketing company.

Artificial intelligence (AI) promises to improve this capability dramatically. Google's AI helper, Bard, is still under wraps. But its rival, incorporated into Microsoft's Bing search engine, is already resolving queries. Ask the old Bing for a summary of Canada's last election results and it points to sites including CBC News and the Globe and Mail. Ask the new Bing and it gives a decent account by itself (along with footnoted links to sources). AI assistants can even reach behind paywalls. A user trying to find the New York Times's recipe for macaroni and cheese will be stopped by a demand for payment and subscription. But ask Bing's AI and it serves up a paraphrased version of the whole recipe, complete with a licking-lips emoji.

The search companies admit they are still finding their way with new technology, which is mostly not yet on general release. That is unlikely to satisfy publishers' lawyers. The chief counsel at one large media company argues that AI-search companies should be made to license the content they regurgitate, just as Spotify has to pay record labels to play their songs. AI's use of others' material is "the copyright question of our times", he says. For years the complaints of publishers against platforms have rung somewhat hollow. Now they have a real story on their hands. ■

To stay on top of the biggest stories in business and technology, sign up to the Bottom Line, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter.

This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline "Breaking news"

Business March 4th 2023
How the titans of tech investing are staying warm over the VC winter
Investors are going nuts for ChatGPT-ish artificial intelligence
Foreign investors are being snagged by India's tax net
Artificial intelligence is reaching behind newspaper paywalls
The uses and abuses of hype
Lessons from Novo Nordisk on the stampede for obesity drugs

From the March 4th 2023 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition
Reuse this content
More from Business

Foreign investors are being snagged by India's tax net
Indian startups will suffer


The uses and abuses of hype
How excitement can help and hinder entrepreneurs


Lessons from Novo Nordisk on the stampede for obesity drugs
Dos and don'ts on how to handle a gold rush

Enviado do meu Galaxy

The uses and abuses of hype
Economist/Business & Finance / 2023-03-02 15:335
Business | Bartleby
How excitement can help and hinder entrepreneurs
Mar 2nd 2023
Hype and absurdity go together. As excitement about the next big thing builds, people fall over themselves to get on board. A year and a half ago, the metaverse was the future. Companies appointed chief metaverse officers, and futurologists burbled about web 3.0. The idea has not gone away. Colombia held its first court case in the metaverse last month (imagine a video game called Wii Justice and you get the picture). But the excitement has evaporated, at least for now. Microsoft disbanded its industrial metaverse team last month; the career prospects of chief metaverse officers are more virtual than even they would like.

Other technologies have suffered the same reversal. There was a point when it was deeply fashionable to rave about the blockchain, crypto and non-fungible tokens. Now the attention of users, investors and managers is firmly fixed on artificial intelligence (AI). Since ChatGPT, an AI chatbot, was made available to the public at the end of November, it has generated another wave of hype. Over 100m people have asked it to rewrite IKEA furniture instructions in iambic pentameter or something equally vital; venture-capital funds are pouring money into AI startups; established firms are rushing to explain how they will use the technology to do everything from customer service to coding.

Hype need not end in disappointment. Some technologies are less speculative than others; the metaverse is still largely notional, for example, whereas AI is an established field. Even when bubbles burst, they can leave world-changing companies behind. The hype cycle, popularised by Gartner, a consultancy, is real. In essence, it describes a period of uncontrolled enthusiasm for a new idea followed by a backlash.

That makes hype bittersweet for entrepreneurs. Excitement can help unlock funding and attract users. Some think of hype as a public good, vital in enabling new technologies to get going. But it can also lead to problems. The question is how to manage hype for the best.

An obvious temptation for entrepreneurs is to take advantage of the hype by making wild—even deceitful—promises. A paper from 2021 by Paul Momtaz of UCLA Anderson School of Management looked at the once-faddish field of initial coin offerings (icos), in which new cryptocurrencies are issued directly to the public. Mr Momtaz found that not only did issuers systematically overplay their tokens' prospects but that investors fell for it. Exaggerated claims raised more money in less time than accurate ones. ICOs are far less hyped these days, but the opportunity to trick investors apparently remains: over 100 new cryptocurrencies have been created that have ChatGPT in their name.

Wilful exaggeration might be a perfectly logical strategy if entrepreneurs are raising money once. But if they want to build a business, tap capital in repeated funding rounds or maintain a close relationship with investors and users, hype might become a liability. Some dangers are obvious: disappointment and damaged credibility if things do not turn out as well as promised. Other dangers are more subtle: being too associated with a specific technology can reduce the room that startups have to pivot to a new product or business model.

So hype calls for care. A recent paper by Danielle Logue of University of Technology Sydney and Matthew Grimes of Judge Business School looked at the different paths taken by a number of social-investment stockmarkets that were set up in 2013 as the buzz over impact investing grew. The authors contrast the glitzier approach of an exchange in London, which attracted high-profile endorsements, promised a financial revolution and subsequently collapsed, with its more successful Canadian peer, which has relied more on expert advice and incrementalism.

The pros and cons of hype have also been apparent in the short public life of ChatGPT. Hype helped make it the fastest-growing consumer technology in history. But the flaws in the technology now attract as much attention. Microsoft, which has integrated a souped-up version of the chatbot into its Bing search engine, has restricted access to the new version and set limits on how many questions users can ask it in a row (an idea well worth adopting in all meetings). As Mr Grimes points out, entrepreneurs who are pushing entirely new products are expected to distort reality without overinflating expectations. How they handle hype can help determine whether they can pull off this difficult balancing act. ■

Read more from Bartleby, our columnist on management and work:
Unshowy competence brings drawbacks as well as benefits (Feb 23rd)
Why it's time to get shot of coffee meetings at work (Feb 16th)
The pitfalls of loving your job a little too much (Feb 9th)

To stay on top of the biggest stories in business and technology, sign up to the Bottom Line, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter.

This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline "The uses and abuses of hype"

Business March 4th 2023
How the titans of tech investing are staying warm over the VC winter
Investors are going nuts for ChatGPT-ish artificial intelligence
Foreign investors are being snagged by India's tax net
Artificial intelligence is reaching behind newspaper paywalls
The uses and abuses of hype
Lessons from Novo Nordisk on the stampede for obesity drugs

From the March 4th 2023 edition
Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition
Reuse this content
More from Business

Foreign investors are being snagged by India's tax net
Indian startups will suffer


Artificial intelligence is reaching behind newspaper paywalls
Publishers long accused tech firms of profiting from their content. Now they have a point


Lessons from Novo Nordisk on the stampede for obesity drugs
Dos and don'ts on how to handle a gold rush

Enviado do meu Galaxy

New drugs could spell an end to the world's obesity epidemic | Leaders
The Economist Print edition / 2023-03-02 22:052
A new type of drug is generating excitement among the rich and the beautiful. Just a jab a week, and the weight falls off. Elon Musk swears by it; influencers sing its praises on TikTok; suddenly slimmer Hollywood starlets deny they have taken it. But the latest weight-loss drugs are no mere cosmetic enhancements. Their biggest beneficiaries will be not celebrities in Los Angeles or Miami but billions of ordinary people around the world whose weight has made them unhealthy.

Listen to this story. Enjoy more audio and podcasts on iOS or Android.
Your browser does not support the <audio> element.

Treatments for weight loss have long ranged from the well-meaning and ineffective to the downright dodgy. The new class of drugs, called glp-1 receptor agonists, seems actually to work. Semaglutide, developed by Novo Nordisk, a Danish pharmaceutical firm, has been shown in clinical trials to lead to weight loss of about 15%. It is already being sold under the brand name Wegovy in America, Denmark and Norway and will soon be available in other countries; Ozempic, a lower-dose version, is a diabetes drug that is also being used "off label" for weight loss. A rival glp-1 drug, made by Eli Lilly, an American firm, is due to come on sale later this year and is more effective still. Analysts think the market for glp-1 drugs could reach $150bn by 2031, not far off the market for cancer drugs today. Some think they could become as common as beta blockers or statins.

The drugs could not have arrived at a better time. In 2020 two-fifths of the world's population were overweight or obese. By 2035, says the World Obesity Federation, an ngo, that figure could swell to more than half, with a staggering 4bn people overweight or obese. People everywhere are getting fatter. The populations putting on pounds the fastest are not in the rich West but in countries like Egypt, Mexico and Saudi Arabia.

These trends are alarming because obesity causes a host of health problems, including diabetes, heart disease and high blood pressure, as well as dozens of illnesses such as stroke, gout and various cancers. Carrying extra weight made people more likely to die of covid-19. And then there is the misery that comes from the stigma associated with being fat, which affects children in schools and playgrounds most cruelly of all.

The consequences of obesity for the public purse and the wider economy are large. According to modelling by academics the annual cost to the world economy of excess weight could reach $4trn by 2035 (2.9% of global gdp, up from 2.2% in 2019). That includes both spending on health care and working time lost to illness and premature deaths tied to obesity.

The world's expanding waistlines are not a sign of the moral failure of the billions who are overweight, but the result of biology. The genes that were vital to helping humans survive winters and famine still help the body cling on to its weight today. The superabundance of hard-to-resist processed foods in recent decades has brought greater convenience and lower costs, but also triggered overeating just as lifestyles became more sedentary. Once the fat is on, the body fights any attempt to diet away more than a little of its total weight. Despite the $250bn that consumers around the world spent on dieting and weight loss last year, the battle to get slim was largely being lost.

The new obesity drugs arrived by serendipity, after treatments meant for diabetics were observed to cause weight loss. Semaglutide mimics the release of hormones that stimulate a feeling of fullness and reduce the appetite. They also switch off the powerful urge to eat that lurks inside the brain, waiting to ambush even the keenest dieter.

With the jabs already in high demand, investors are nearly as giddy as newly slim users. The market capitalisation of Novo Nordisk, the firm at the front of the gold rush, has doubled in two years, to $326bn, making it the second-most-valuable listed drugmaker in the world. Analysts expect half of obese Americans who seek help to be on glp-1 drugs by the turn of the decade. But, as with any new medicine that holds so much promise for so many, there are uncertainties. Two big ones will be safety and affordability.

Consider safety first. The newness of these drugs means that their long-term consequences are not yet known. For the lower-dose forms prescribed for diabetes, the side-effects, such as vomiting and diarrhoea, have been mild. But others could crop up as the drugs are used more widely and at higher doses. Animal studies have shown a higher incidence of thyroid cancer, and semaglutide is associated with a rare pancreatitis. Little is known about the effects of using them during or just before pregnancy. All this will require careful analysis through controlled longitudinal studies.

Understanding these risks will be important, because many patients who take the drugs may need them for the rest of their lives. As with ditching a diet, stopping a high dose of semaglutide is associated with much of the lost weight piling back on. Some people even gain more weight than they lost in the first place.

Another preoccupation for policymakers is cost. In America the bill for Wegovy runs at around $1,300 a month; for Ozempic about $900. Judged by such prices, lifelong prescriptions look forbiddingly expensive. The longer view, however, is more encouraging. In time, companies may strike deals with governments and health providers to cover the whole population, ensuring high volumes in return for low prices. The prospect of profits is already luring competition and spurring innovation. Amgen, AstraZeneca and Pfizer are all working on rival drugs; Novo Nordisk has a full pipeline of follow-on drugs. Further ahead still, patents will expire, enabling the development of lower-priced generics.

The shape of things to come
What to do in the meantime? Governments must ensure that those who most need the drugs get them, leaving those taking them for cosmetic purposes to pay out of their own pockets. The long-term effects must be carefully studied. States should keep pressing other anti-obesity measures, such as exercise, healthy eating and better food labelling, which may help prevent people from getting fat in the first place. But spare a moment to celebrate, too. These new drugs mean that the world's fight against flab may eventually be won. ■

For subscribers only: to see how we design each week's cover, sign up to our weekly Cover Story newsletter.

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Business | The world this week
The Economist Print edition / 2023-03-02 22:05

Goldman Sachs held an investors' day, its first in three years, amid grumbling from shareholders about the direction of the bank after a slump in profit last year. David Solomon, its chief executive, raised the possibility of selling parts of its lossmaking consumer services after it has finished scaling back the division. It has become clear "that we lacked certain competitive advantages" in the business, he said. Markets were left unimpressed by the presentation. Goldman's share price fell after the event.

Tesla held its first ever investor day, at which Elon Musk outlined part three of his "Master Plan" for the company. Senior executives also took part and said an electric car for the mass market was in the works, which is essential for Tesla's sales ambitions. But the lack of detail about the new model disappointed investors.

Tesla also confirmed that it is building its first factory in Mexico, in Monterrey. It is the latest carmaker to invest in making electric vehicles in Mexico; in February BMW said it would expand production and build a factory to assemble batteries. Mexico is benefiting from the huge green subsidies in America's Inflation Reduction Act, $34bn of which is earmarked for smoothing the supply chain for EVs.

The euro zone's annual inflation rate remained virtually unchanged in February at 8.5%, though the reading was higher than the 8.2% that economists had expected. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and energy prices, increased to 5.6%. Inflation also rose in the currency bloc's two biggest economies, Germany and France, adding to pressure on the European Central Bank to continue raising interest rates.

A measure of factory activity in China grew at its fastest rate in a decade, suggesting that the economy is bouncing back from covid-19 lockdowns and other restrictions. The official purchasing managers' index for manufacturing registered 52.6 for February, up from 50.1 in January (a reading over 50 means manufacturing is growing). The news triggered a rally in Hong Kong's stockmarket.

America's three main stockmarkets declined in February. The S&P 500 was down by 2.6% and the NASDAQ composite by 1.1%. Both indices are still up for the year. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 4.2% in February; it has dropped by over 1% so far this year.

Sorting out the greenwashing
The European Commission announced that an agreement had been reached on its proposed standard for EU green bonds. Companies that want to promote their bonds as climate-friendly will have to ensure that the investments meet strict sustainability requirements. It is not yet clear what the penalties will be if companies' bonds don't meet the new standards.

Sweden's economy shrank by 0.9% in the last three months of 2022 compared with the previous quarter. The country is expected to fall into recession this year as soaring prices and higher interest rates knock consumer spending. House prices are falling sharply. Finland's economy did fall into recession in the fourth quarter, contracting by 0.6% after a 0.1% decline in the third quarter.

An accounting charge on stock-based compensation caused Zoom to report its first quarterly loss since 2018. The video-conference company's revenue grew by just 4%, year on year. A year earlier sales were still growing by 20%.


The share price of Beyond Meat fell back, having rallied after it produced better forecasts for the year than expected. Its stock is up by 38% since the start of 2023, even though revenue fell by 20% in the fourth quarter, year on year, and it made another net loss. Sales for the alternative-meat industry were butchered last year, in part because fake meat hasn't lived up to the hype of being as tasty as the real thing.

Ocado reported another big annual loss. Revenue from its online-groceries business in Britain fell. It had more customers but they put fewer items in their baskets: 46 on average, down from 52 in 2021.

International Airlines Group, the owner of British Airways, made its first annual operating profit since the start of the pandemic: €1.3bn ($1.4bn). Passenger revenue soared to €19.5bn from €5.8bn in 2021. IAG expects profit to climb.

Come fly with me
Cathay Pacific began giving away free return flights to Hong Kong to residents of South-East Asia as part of the city's campaign to lure back tourists after lockdown. The government is making 500,000 tickets available. Cathay is providing 80,000. Hong Kong's main airline has had a turbulent few years, from being ensnared in pro-democracy politics to coming close to collapse amid covid restrictions. But business is taking off again. Cathay flew 1m passengers in January, up by 4,000%, year on year.

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Entire Treasury Market Yields at Least 4%, Now Including 30-Year
Yahoo! Finance: Top Stories / 2023-03-02 17:3022


(Bloomberg) -- The US 30-year yield rose to the highest level since November Thursday, joining the rest of the Treasury market in offering investors a return of at least 4% after another batch of strong labor-market data.

Most Read from Bloomberg

Yields across the Treasury market climbed following an upward revision to the fourth-quarter unit-labor-costs growth rate. The 30-year yield rose as much as 9 basis points to 4.045%, up from a 2023 low of 3.5% in early February, and ended the day at around 4.03%.

While shorter-maturity yields have been spurred higher as traders raised forecasts for the peak Federal Reserve policy rate, longer-dated ones respond more to signs of sticky inflation. A jump in a gauge of US manufacturer prices Wednesday stoked fears that a forthcoming companion report on the services sector will remain buoyant and spark further selling.

"Another firm ISM services number on Friday will see higher yields across the curve," said Jack McIntyre, portfolio manager at Brandywine Global Investment Management. "As a long-duration investor, we are in a tough environment, but we see the backup in yields as an opportunity."

Treasury yields ticked higher earlier in the session along with rates on European bonds after inflation in the euro area slowed less than anticipated in February, while the core measure surged to a new record. The data reinforced expectations that the European Central Bank will have to push borrowing costs ever higher.

The US Treasury market has erased its January gains, which followed its worst year on record, with renewed bearish sentiment also spurred by robust Chinese economic data.

The 10-year note's yield traded above 4% for the first time since November on Wednesday and rose as high as 4.09% on Thursday.

Shorter-maturity yields, more sensitive to the eight increases in the Fed's policy rate over the past year, have exceeded the 4% threshold for varying amounts of time. The two-year yield has traded above that threshold since September and rose to a high of 4.94% on Thursday, a level last seen in July 2007.

The two-year remains the highest-yielding Treasury note or bond, reflecting expectations that the Fed's rate increases are sowing the seeds of an economic slowdown. Consistent with that, swap contracts referencing Fed meeting dates continue to price in roughly 50% odds that the central bank will lower its policy rate by a quarter point from the peak by the end of the year.

The Fed raised its policy rate most recently to a range of 4.5%-4.75% on Feb. 1. Traders expect the central bank will raise policy to a peak of around 5.5%, according to swaps that reference the Fed's September meeting.

With long-end yields now back above 4%, some on Wall Street say levels are appealing to build exposure as the prospect of a hard landing for the economy beckons. Priya Misra, global head of rates strategy at TD Securities, said she would "enter some more longs at 4%" in 10- and 30-year Treasuries, noting TD began recommending that trade when yields rose to 3.8%.

Long-dated yields at 4% "will look really cheap" once the Fed pushes unemployment higher and engineers a hard landing, Misra said on Bloomberg Television Thursday. Investors should still retain "some dry powder to keep adding" to the long end as yields could shoot higher to 4.25% in the near term, she said.

(Updates yield levels.)

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek

©2023 Bloomberg L.P.

Enclosures

0d1ccfaa13664c52f84a84dafb998959

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Enviado do meu Galaxy

The Inverse Jim Cramer ETF Has Officially Arrived
por Tyler Durden

Zero Hedge / 2023-03-02 19:51145
The Inverse Jim Cramer ETF Has Officially Arrived
If you're active in the markets, it's almost a certainty that you've heard a joke about betting on the opposite of whatever non-stop-stock-picker Jim Cramer suggests to retail investors. 

Now, retail investors can do just that. There is a new pair of products coming to market this week called the Inverse Cramer Tracker ETF (ticker SJIM) and the Long Cramer Tracker ETF (LJIM) that will now allow investors to bet against (or with) the Mad Money host. 

The same group that brought you SARK, the inverse ARKK Fund ETF are the ones putting together the ETFs. The funds are the brain-child of Matthew Tuttle, CEO of Tuttle Capital Management. 

"If he specifically says either buy, buy, buy a stock, then we're gonna go short that stock at the next practical moment," he recently told Bloomberg. "If he tells you he hates a stock or sell, sell, sell or something like that, then we're gonna go long that name again at the next kind of practical entry point."

The inverse fund "is an actively managed exchange traded fund that seeks to achieve its investment objective by engaging in transactions designed to perform the opposite of the return of the investments recommended by television personality Jim Cramer," the company said in a prospectus late last year. 


"Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the Fund's investments is invested in the inverse of securities mentioned by Cramer," it says of its strategy. 

The filing continues:

The Fund's adviser monitors Cramer's stock selection recommendations throughout the trading day as publicly announced on Twitter or his television programs broadcast on CNBC, and sells those recommendations short or enters into derivatives transactions such as futures, options or swaps that produce a negative correlation to those recommendations.

The Fund's portfolio generally is comprised of 20 to 25 equity securities not recommended by Cramer. To the extent possible, the Fund's portfolio is equally weighted. The Fund may invest in securities with any market capitalization and in securities of issuers located in the United States and abroad.

Should Cramer recommend buying any of the securities in the Fund's portfolio, the Fund will dispose of those holdings. Should Cramer recommend selling any of the securities in the Fund's portfolio, the Fund will keep those holdings. If Cramer does not take any view on any of the securities in the Fund's portfolio, the adviser retains discretion to sell positions once profit or loss targets are met, or market conditions such as large swings in either direction necessitate a sale and replace them with securities that meet the criteria of the Fund's initial portfolio. Under normal circumstances, the Fund will hold positions no longer than a week.

As we said back in October, we're sure the new ETF will have no trouble attracting attention and investors. Also, as contrarians, we also can't help but wonder if this public acceptance of Cramer's uncanny ability to get things wrong is finally a reason to start looking at taking him seriously.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/02/2023 - 13:45

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Tesla Master Plan Draws Disappointed Reviews on Twitter
por Ellen Chang

The Street: Stock Market / 2023-03-02 20:1456
CEO Elon Musk provided few details about Tesla's future plans at its annual investor day on March 1.

Investors and owners of Tesla  (TSLA) - Get Free Report appeared disappointed with the company's "master plan" discussing the future of electric vehicles and a sustainable energy economy.

The long-awaited annual investor day on March 1 revealed few details about new models, when the Cybertruck would be produced and if Tesla is moving forward with a cheaper $25,000 model.

DONT MISS: Tesla Unveils New Vehicle Manufacturing Platform to Cut Costs by 50%

The electric vehicle maker said a new vehicle manufacturing platform would enable Tesla to cut costs by 50%, but details were not provided.

The goal is to offer low cost vehicles in order to reach the masses who still shy away from electric vehicles because of the often prohibitive prices.

In response, CEO Elon Musk tweeted, "Detailed whitepaper with calculations & assumptions to be released by Tesla shortly."

But fans and owners of Tesla's vehicles expressed their dismay at the scant details provided by Musk and the EV maker's executives. 

One person, named "Randeep," tweeted, "But why would they do that they got our hopes up so much for investors day most of us were expecting future cars or robo taxis I think even most of the analysts were expecting that that's why they increased the PT too.. this will affect the short run of tsla for sure."

Even long-time fans of Tesla were not impressed with the lack of new information given at investor day. Dmitriy Strunin remarked on the length of the  presentation that lasted four hours. Other companies such as Apple have usually spent only 60 to 90 minutes for their presentations.

"Im not gonna lie you guys need to consolidate the presentation," he tweeted. "Love the company and its people but that was just too drawn out and unnecessary in my opinion. I think it was overwhelming with detail."

Another person with a Twitter account of "NJ Citizen" suggested that Tesla emulate Apple's investor day presentations that are more concise.

The presentation drew the ire of many people, including Mark Pensarn.

"Whoever planned the format and withholding ANY news on the much anticipated new less expensive model , needs to be reprimanded," he tweeted. "This wasn't the exciting upbeat presentation we needed . The Info was Superb but delivery poor . Cost a lot of small investors a LOT !!. PR needed ."

Other people commented on Musk and the delivery of statements on the future of Tesla. Last October, Musk took Twitter, a social media platform, private in a $44 billion acquisition and has devoted much of this time and attention on the deal.

Brianna Wu, executive director of Rebellion Pac, tweeted, "I'm watching @elonmusk speak at the Tesla investor day," she tweeted. "It's so clear the train wreck of Twitter is having a massive psychological effect on him. He's clearly tired. His answers are completely incoherent. There's no vision here. He seems really unhappy."

Some Tesla fans reacted positively to the presentation. Brian Aroniss tweeted, "That is awesome. Great job everyone The stock went down because people were bored, mostly because they didn't understand what was being said, it was over their heads. I am stoked!"

Sybill Hill Carter,commended Tesla on its presentation. 

"Thank you for hours of information!" she tweeted. "As a long Tesla investor I needed to understand. Applaud the team, the upgrades to cut price on the end product and Tesla vision to a cleaner planet is continuous.

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Koch Industries appoints co-CEO from outside namesake family
Financial Times: Markets / 2023-03-02 20:266


Charles Koch, the billionaire who turned Koch Industries from a 300-person oil and ranching business into America's second-largest private company over half a century, has decided to share power with an executive from outside his family.

Dave Robertson, a veteran of nearly 30 years at the Wichita, Kansas-based group, is stepping up from the role of chief operating officer to be co-chief executive along with Charles Koch as part of a reshuffle, which the company said would ensure that it continued to "succeed well into the future". 

Charles Koch, aged 87 and with a fortune estimated by Bloomberg at $67bn, will continue as chair, a role he has held since 1967. His son, Chase, has played an increasingly visible role in the company and is adding the title of executive vice-president to his existing job leading an investment arm called Koch Disruptive Technologies.

"My role and responsibilities will continue as they have been," Charles Koch said in a statement, adding: "I believe altogether these changes will improve our ability to continually transform for the benefit of our company, our employees, our customers and people throughout society."

Koch Industries has 120,000 employees across 60 countries and annual revenues of $125bn, but it has also become well known for the political activism of its controlling family.

Charles and his brother David, who died in 2019, became leading funders of libertarian causes and Republican candidates, enraging many on the left for their backing of conservative judges and support for groups that denied the scientific consensus on climate change.

At the same time, they split from former US president Donald Trump on subjects including trade and gay marriage. Americans for Prosperity, the US donor network Charles Koch leads, recently indicated that it would oppose Trump's bid to secure re-election in 2024.

Koch Industries ranks second only to Cargill in Forbes' revenue-based ranking of private US companies. It remains a significant player in the energy refining and trading industries but has diversified to consumer products such as Brawny paper towels and investments in technologies including batteries for electric vehicles.

Robertson has already run several of Koch's largest operations since joining the company in 1984, including Flint Hills Resources, the refineries and pipelines business, and serves on the boards of subsidiaries including Georgia-Pacific, its paper products group. He will also add the title of vice-chair.

Last year he defended Koch's decision to maintain two glass factories in Russia even as other western companies were leaving the country after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. "We will not walk away from our employees there or hand over these manufacturing facilities to the Russian government so it can operate and benefit from them," he said.

Koch later sold its business in Russia, Robertson said last July.

Jim Hannan, an executive vice-president who oversees operations including Georgia-Pacific and the Guardian Industries glass business, will succeed Robertson as the group's president and chief operating officer.

This story has been updated to clarify that Koch Industries has sold its business in Russia

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Ford Has Applied for a Patent That Will Freak Out People Who Miss Car Payments
por Jeffrey Quiggle

The Street: Stock Market / 2023-03-02 20:35

Owners of Ford vehicles could face the reality of a car or truck driving itself away if this patent application is accepted.

Ford Motor Company  (F) - Get Free Report has applied for a patent with a surprising new approach to repossessing vehicles.

It's a surprising, and somewhat dystopian idea.

The patent application involves a method for a car whose owner has missed payments to drive itself to a repo lot.

DON'T MISS: Apple Just Filed a Patent for a Potentially Revolutionary New IPhone 

The application, filed on Aug. 20, 2021 and currently still pending approval, first describes a feature that will lock an owner or lessee out of use of the car.

A message would be sent to an individual regarding delinquency of a payment.

"When an acknowledgment is not received within a reasonable period of time, the first computer may disable a functionality of a component of the vehicle or may place the vehicle in a lockout condition," the application says. 

It then describes a scenario in which the vehicle being repossessed has self-driving capability.

"The vehicle can be an autonomous vehicle and the repossession system computer may cooperate with the vehicle computer to autonomously move the vehicle from the premises of the owner to a location such as, for example, the premises of the repossession agency, the premises of the lending institution, and impound pound, or any other pre-designated location," the application explains.

The patent contains drawings illustrating how computer systems communicating with the car's computer would work.

"Ford files patent for system that could remotely repossess a car," tweeted Ars Technica.

Before taking the ultimate repossession step, other measures might be taken to incentivize the driver of the car to make payments.

"There would be several warnings from the vehicle before the system initiated a formal repossession," The Drive reported. "If these warnings were ignored, the car could begin to lose functionality ahead of a repo. The first lost functions would be minor inconveniences like 'cruise control, automated window controls, automated seat controls, and some components of the infotainment system (radio, global positioning system (GPS), MP3 player, etc.).'

"The next level is more serious, and includes the loss of things like 'the air conditioning system, a remote key fob, and an automated door lock/unlock system.' Likewise, an 'incessant and unpleasant sound' may be turned on 'every time the owner is present in the vehicle,'" according to The Drive. 

Enviado do meu Galaxy

"Havana syndrome" not caused by foreign adversary, U.S. intel finds
Reuters / 2023-03-01 18:0113
2023-03-01T17:43:59Z
An extensive U.S. intelligence community investigation has concluded it was "very unlikely" a foreign adversary was responsible for the "Havana syndrome" ailments that have afflicted U.S. diplomats and intelligence officers worldwide, according to declassified findings released on Wednesday.

The mysterious ailment, first reported among U.S. officials in the Cuban capital in 2016, has afflicted U.S. diplomats, officials and family members overseas. Symptoms have included migraines, nausea, memory lapses and dizziness.

The U.S. intelligence assessment found no credible evidence that any American adversary had a weapon or device capable of causing symptoms consistent with the syndrome.

As part of the investigation, which lasted more than six years, U.S. intelligence agencies considered the possibility that extraterrestrials were responsible for the Havana syndrome but ruled that out, a U.S. official said in a briefing to reporters.

In January, a CIA official said the agency found it was unlikely that Russia or another "foreign actor" caused most of the anomalous health incidents.

That official, describing the conclusions of an interim report on the Havana Syndrome, said a majority of 1,000 cases "can be reasonably explained by medical conditions or environmental and technical factors, including previously undiagnosed illnesses."

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Oil Demand Set To Climb As China's Economy Finally Rebounds
por Tsvetana Paraskova

Oilprice.com / 2023-03-01 18:041


China's economy appears to be leaving behind the early faltering of the reopening, with manufacturing, construction, and export orders rebounding sharply in February, in a sign that the world's top crude importer could soon start seeing a jump in oil demand.

The Chinese manufacturing purchasing managers' index (PMI) jumped to 52.6 in February from 50.1 in January, data from China's National Bureau of Statistics showed on Wednesday. The surge in factory activity was the fastest in over a decade—the highest figure since April 2012. 

The index for non-manufacturing sectors, including construction and services, also jumped, signaling an overall expansion of the Chinese economy in February and possibly a faster-than-expected rebound after the reopening from the 'zero-Covid' policies which the country ditched at the end of last year.

The Caixin China General Manufacturing PMI, compiled by S&P Global, also showed a rebound in February and signaled a return to more normal business conditions. This, in turn, raised business confidence of Chinese manufacturing firms to a 23-month high, S&P Global said.

Analysts warn that the big monthly jump in the Chinese manufacturing and non-manufacturing indicators could be the result of a low base of comparison in January and pent-up demand following the reopening. Nevertheless, some economists say the return to normal conditions could happen sooner than expected.

Last month, the International Energy Agency (IEA) said that global oil demand was set to increase by 2 million barrels per day (bpd) this year, pushed up by growth in Chinese consumption after the reopening.

In its closely-watched Oil Market Report, the IEA raised its 2023 global oil demand growth estimate by 100,000 bpd from the previous month's forecast. China's resurgent oil demand – with growth seen at 900,000 bpd this year – and the rest of the Asia-Pacific region will dominate global growth, according to the IEA.

"China accounts for nearly half the 2 mb/d projected increase this year, with neighbouring countries also set to benefit after Beijing ditched its zero-Covid policies," the IEA said.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Hydrogen Cars Could Soon Compete With Electric Vehicles
por Felicity Bradstock

Oilprice.com / 2023-03-01 18:041


The first mass-produced fuel cell car came to market in 2014, but a combination of high costs and a lack of funding means that hydrogen-powered cars have failed to go mainstream.
As the global hydrogen market grows, and particularly as governments pour money into green hydrogen projects, the potential for hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles is growing.
Several of the biggest automakers have now announced new fuel cell developments and have made it clear that hydrogen cars will be a part of their offerings going forward.
While many automakers have been focused on developing battery electric vehicles (BEVs), another green alternative to traditional cars has been gaining momentum – the hydrogen-driven fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV). Green hydrogen has been hailed as the clean fuel of the future in recent years, something that many automakers have considered while developing fuel cell cars. While there has been much talk about the rise of the FCEV, most companies are still in the early development stage. But now, some companies are ready to present their FCEV demonstration models to the public to see how they fare in comparison to the EVs on the market. 

Fuel cell electric vehicles work much in the same way as traditional BEVs, running on an electric motor instead of an internal combustion engine (ICE). However, BEVs rely on a battery that needs to be plugged in to recharge, using electricity from the grid. Meanwhile, FCEVs can produce electricity onboard, without the need for charging. This is extremely attractive to car manufacturers looking to increase the range their cars can go without the need to charge, making it easier for consumers to shift from ICE vehicles to green alternatives. 

One of the major benefits of hydrogen is that it emits only water and heat, rather than greenhouse gases, into the atmosphere. With governments and energy firms worldwide pumping funds into green hydrogen projects, automakers are increasingly seeing the potential for cars to run on this clean fuel. To make climate-friendly FCEVs, automakers must ensure that the hydrogen they are sourcing is green, rather than grey – derived from natural gas. At present, the cost of green hydrogen is far higher than carbon-emitting alternatives. But as companies invest more in research and development, the price of green hydrogen is expected to fall, much in the same way as was seen in the cost of wind and solar energy as operations expanded. 

Despite the significant potential of FCEVs running on green hydrogen, the concept of a fuel cell is still relatively unknown in the consumer market. While most people have heard of BEVs by now, particularly since the Tesla boom, automakers have shared little information about the development of an HFCV fleet with consumers. This is likely due to the multitude of hurdles that still need to be overcome before HFCVs hit the market. For example, the size and weight of a fuel cell that can generate enough electricity to run a car or larger vehicle continue to be an issue. 

But some automakers are now taking their innovations to the public, demonstrating that they expect the future of transportation to be broader than just BEVs. In February, Honda announced it would be manufacturing a new hydrogen fuel cell system that it co-developed with GM. This is expected to support the growth of its hydrogen business, with aims of selling 2,000 units of the new system annually by the middle of the decade, and over 60,000 units a year by 2030. Honda expects its "next-generation system" to be more durable than previous fuel cells, and around two-thirds cheaper than existing options. 

Meanwhile, BMW has launched a demonstration fleet of hydrogen cars that use fuel cells from Toyota. Last month, the German automaker unveiled its BMW iX5 Hydrogen, with a top speed of over 112 miles per hour, which is currently being assembled in Munich. The company's CEO believes this is "the missing piece in the jigsaw when it comes to emission-free mobility."

Hydrogen is stored in two tanks, which can be refueled in three to four minutes, just like when pumping petrol. This provides the iX5 with a much greater range than most BEVs, at around 313 miles. BMW is planning for the launch of a small initial fleet in 2023 – fewer than 100 vehicles, mainly to be "employed internationally for demonstration and trial purposes for various target groups." 

In addition to Honda and BMW, Toyota and Hyundai are two other major automakers looking to develop their FCEV capabilities to compete with car manufacturers focusing solely on BEVs. While the technology may be lagging behind that of electric batteries, the potential is significant. 

Toyota has been investing in its fuel cell technology for over 30 years and introduced its first FCEV to the market in 2014, the Mirai sedan. The new version of the Mirai, launched in 2021, provides an extended driving range of around 650 km, and uses green hydrogen, meaning no polluting emissions. And Hyundai outlined its 'FCEV Vision 2030' in 2018, aimed at acceleratingthe development of a hydrogen society. Hyundai hopes to produce 700,000 fuel-cell systems annually by 2030, including 500,000 units for FCEVs, creating 51,000 jobs in the industry. 

While the development of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles has lagged behind battery EVs, greater investment in the industry has supported the innovations needed to get HFCVs to the market. With more and more automakers broadening their vision beyond BEVs and investing in hydrogen, we can expect to see several HFCVs within the next decade, offering an attractive alternative to the battery EV. 

By Felicity Bradstock for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Enviado do meu Galaxy

3M's stock surges after company says DOD data show 90% of earplug plaintiffs had 'normal' hearing
Yahoo! Finance: Top Stories / 2023-03-01 18:323


Shares of 3M Co. surged Wednesday after the maker of consumer, industrial and healthcare products said the U.S. Department of Defense's records show that the "vast majority" of claimants in litigation over the company's Combat Arms earplugs have normal hearing under medically accepted standards.

The company, which also makes Post-it Notes, N95 masks and Scotch tape, said the DOD data show that almost 90% of the 175,000 plaintiffs in the earplug litigation have "no hearing impairment" under American Medical Association standards.

Under World Health Organization and National Institutes of Health standards, 3M said, the data show that more than 85% of plaintiffs have "normal" hearing.

3M added that for nearly a quarter of the plaintiffs who do have hearing impairment under either AMA or WHO standards, the DOD data show that they reported their condition in hearing tests before they used the Combat Arms earplugs.

The stock MMM, +2.29% rallied 3.5% in midday trading after closing at a five-month low in the previous session. The $3.73 stock-price gain added about 25 points to the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, +0.02%, while the Dow gained 45 points, or 0.1%.

3M has been facing litigation related to the Combat Arms earplugs for the past year, resulting from allegations of "fraudulent misrepresentation and concealment." Some on Wall Street estimated potential liabilities of about $14 billion.

Bryan Aylstock and Chris Seeger, co-lead counsels for the plaintiffs, who are service members and veterans, said in an emailed statement to MarketWatch on Wednesday that 3M's announcement was another attempt by the company to mislead the public. They said the DOD data in fact show that about 85% of the plaintiffs suffer from hearing loss or tinnitus.

"The standards relied upon by 3M in their estimation motion were not even used by their own experts in any of the 16 bellwether trials," Aylstock and Seeger stated. "Of the 13 jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs totaling nearly $300 million, 11 [plaintiffs] under 3M's scheme would be considered 'unimpaired' — even those who were wearing hearing aids."

In July 2022, 3M said its Aearo Technologies subsidiary, which it acquired in 2008 and which made the earplugs, had voluntarily filed for bankruptcy to help establish a trust as it looked to resolve all claims "determined to be entitled to compensation." 3M has committed $1 billion to the trust and an additional $200 million to fund expenses related to the case and has said it will provide additional funding if required.

In 3M's annual report filed in early February, the company said the bankruptcy and funding of the trust reflected a "change in strategy" for managing the alleged litigation liabilities.

"On February 3, we filed a motion to dismiss 3M's contrived bankruptcy," Aylstock and Seeger said. "3M is a multibillion-dollar corporate enterprise that is not remotely in financial distress, and therefore should not be able to use the bankruptcy system against the service members and veterans it injured."

3M's stock has tumbled 23% over the past 12 months, while the Dow has slipped 1.8%.

Enclosures

b82fba32ec8d0cd498f3020feb182b44

Enviado do meu Galaxy

3M's stock surges after company says DOD data show 90% of earplug plaintiffs had 'normal' hearing
Yahoo! Finance: Top Stories / 2023-03-01 18:323


Shares of 3M Co. surged Wednesday after the maker of consumer, industrial and healthcare products said the U.S. Department of Defense's records show that the "vast majority" of claimants in litigation over the company's Combat Arms earplugs have normal hearing under medically accepted standards.

The company, which also makes Post-it Notes, N95 masks and Scotch tape, said the DOD data show that almost 90% of the 175,000 plaintiffs in the earplug litigation have "no hearing impairment" under American Medical Association standards.

Under World Health Organization and National Institutes of Health standards, 3M said, the data show that more than 85% of plaintiffs have "normal" hearing.

3M added that for nearly a quarter of the plaintiffs who do have hearing impairment under either AMA or WHO standards, the DOD data show that they reported their condition in hearing tests before they used the Combat Arms earplugs.

The stock MMM, +2.29% rallied 3.5% in midday trading after closing at a five-month low in the previous session. The $3.73 stock-price gain added about 25 points to the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, +0.02%, while the Dow gained 45 points, or 0.1%.

3M has been facing litigation related to the Combat Arms earplugs for the past year, resulting from allegations of "fraudulent misrepresentation and concealment." Some on Wall Street estimated potential liabilities of about $14 billion.

Bryan Aylstock and Chris Seeger, co-lead counsels for the plaintiffs, who are service members and veterans, said in an emailed statement to MarketWatch on Wednesday that 3M's announcement was another attempt by the company to mislead the public. They said the DOD data in fact show that about 85% of the plaintiffs suffer from hearing loss or tinnitus.

"The standards relied upon by 3M in their estimation motion were not even used by their own experts in any of the 16 bellwether trials," Aylstock and Seeger stated. "Of the 13 jury verdicts in favor of plaintiffs totaling nearly $300 million, 11 [plaintiffs] under 3M's scheme would be considered 'unimpaired' — even those who were wearing hearing aids."

In July 2022, 3M said its Aearo Technologies subsidiary, which it acquired in 2008 and which made the earplugs, had voluntarily filed for bankruptcy to help establish a trust as it looked to resolve all claims "determined to be entitled to compensation." 3M has committed $1 billion to the trust and an additional $200 million to fund expenses related to the case and has said it will provide additional funding if required.

In 3M's annual report filed in early February, the company said the bankruptcy and funding of the trust reflected a "change in strategy" for managing the alleged litigation liabilities.

"On February 3, we filed a motion to dismiss 3M's contrived bankruptcy," Aylstock and Seeger said. "3M is a multibillion-dollar corporate enterprise that is not remotely in financial distress, and therefore should not be able to use the bankruptcy system against the service members and veterans it injured."

3M's stock has tumbled 23% over the past 12 months, while the Dow has slipped 1.8%.

Enclosures

b82fba32ec8d0cd498f3020feb182b44

Enviado do meu Galaxy

UniCredit plans to increase CEO Orcel's pay by 30%, source says
por Reuters

Investing.com: Stock Market News / 2023-03-01 18:34



© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Andrea Orcel, then UBS chief executive, leaves after attending a UK parliamentary inquiry into Libor interest rates in London January 9, 2013. REUTERS/Olivia Harris/File Photo
By Valentina Za

MILAN (Reuters) -UniCredit will ask shareholders to approve a new pay structure for Chief Executive Andrea Orcel which offers a 30% rise if the Italian bank beats a wide set of targets this year, a document showed on Wednesday.

Orcel's current pay package of up to 7.5 million euros ($8 million) a year makes the former head of investment banking at Swiss lender UBS one of Europe's best paid bank executives.

UniCredit had said its board would review the CEO's pay based on 2022 earnings, noting that European Union rules capping variable compensation at up to twice the fixed salary made it impossible to reward outperformance.

Starting from a higher fixed salary of 3.25 million euros versus 2.5 million previously, the new system ties a higher overall pay of up to 9.75 million euros to the bank's ability to beat targets set for 2023, the document showed, confirming what sources had told Reuters.

But a lower variable component than last year, ensures that in hitting the targets Orcel would get in 2023 the same compensation as in 2022.

The variable component will be paid all in shares and deferred to 2030, UniCredit said.

"The salary increase is not immaterial but it was necessary to create a proper system of incentives in the 'pay-for-performance' spirit driving other changes within the bank," UniCredit said.

Underperformance curtails the pay package more than in the past.

After Spain's Santander (BME:) withdrew its offer to make him CEO, Orcel in Aprile 2021 took the reins of Italy's second-biggest bank, which had been through years of restructuring to clean up its balance sheet and rebuild capital reserves.

A hard-charging executive, he vowed to end an era of "active retrenchment" and went on to de-centralise decision making to speed up the response to clients' needs.

Helped like other lenders by higher interest rates but also able to grow net fees slightly despite tough markets, UniCredit posted its best net profit in a decade in 2022.

UniCredit shares have gained 42% this year, against a 19% rise in Europe's banking index.

Orcel, who forfeited millions of euros in deferred compensation from UBS in joining UniCredit, narrowly dodged a shareholder revolt on his arrival over his pay, which was double that of his predecessor and included a 4.8 million euro sign-on bonus unrelated to performance.

Since then, UniCredit's share price has more than doubled, adding nearly 20 billion euros to the bank's market value and ensuring its return this week into the euro zone's blue-chip index after seven years.

UniCredit has also increased capital distribution to shareholders by 40% in 2022 and is paying out 5.25 billion euros as dividends and, mainly, share buybacks. ($1 = 0.9369 euros)

Enviado do meu Galaxy

UniCredit plans to increase CEO Orcel's pay by 30%, source says
por Reuters

Investing.com: Stock Market News / 2023-03-01 18:34



© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Andrea Orcel, then UBS chief executive, leaves after attending a UK parliamentary inquiry into Libor interest rates in London January 9, 2013. REUTERS/Olivia Harris/File Photo
By Valentina Za

MILAN (Reuters) -UniCredit will ask shareholders to approve a new pay structure for Chief Executive Andrea Orcel which offers a 30% rise if the Italian bank beats a wide set of targets this year, a document showed on Wednesday.

Orcel's current pay package of up to 7.5 million euros ($8 million) a year makes the former head of investment banking at Swiss lender UBS one of Europe's best paid bank executives.

UniCredit had said its board would review the CEO's pay based on 2022 earnings, noting that European Union rules capping variable compensation at up to twice the fixed salary made it impossible to reward outperformance.

Starting from a higher fixed salary of 3.25 million euros versus 2.5 million previously, the new system ties a higher overall pay of up to 9.75 million euros to the bank's ability to beat targets set for 2023, the document showed, confirming what sources had told Reuters.

But a lower variable component than last year, ensures that in hitting the targets Orcel would get in 2023 the same compensation as in 2022.

The variable component will be paid all in shares and deferred to 2030, UniCredit said.

"The salary increase is not immaterial but it was necessary to create a proper system of incentives in the 'pay-for-performance' spirit driving other changes within the bank," UniCredit said.

Underperformance curtails the pay package more than in the past.

After Spain's Santander (BME:) withdrew its offer to make him CEO, Orcel in Aprile 2021 took the reins of Italy's second-biggest bank, which had been through years of restructuring to clean up its balance sheet and rebuild capital reserves.

A hard-charging executive, he vowed to end an era of "active retrenchment" and went on to de-centralise decision making to speed up the response to clients' needs.

Helped like other lenders by higher interest rates but also able to grow net fees slightly despite tough markets, UniCredit posted its best net profit in a decade in 2022.

UniCredit shares have gained 42% this year, against a 19% rise in Europe's banking index.

Orcel, who forfeited millions of euros in deferred compensation from UBS in joining UniCredit, narrowly dodged a shareholder revolt on his arrival over his pay, which was double that of his predecessor and included a 4.8 million euro sign-on bonus unrelated to performance.

Since then, UniCredit's share price has more than doubled, adding nearly 20 billion euros to the bank's market value and ensuring its return this week into the euro zone's blue-chip index after seven years.

UniCredit has also increased capital distribution to shareholders by 40% in 2022 and is paying out 5.25 billion euros as dividends and, mainly, share buybacks. ($1 = 0.9369 euros)

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Covid shrank the restaurant industry. That's not changing anytime soon
CNN.com - Top Stories / 2023-02-27 18:169
It's never been easy to operate a restaurant, and in recent years it's been even harder.

In 2020, Covid restrictions ground the nation's bustling restaurant industry to a halt. Since then, there have been significant signs of a rebound: Dining rooms have reopened and customers have returned to cafes, fine-dining establishments and fast food joints.

But there are fewer US restaurants today than in 2019. It's not clear when —if ever — they're coming back.

Last year, there were about 631,000 restaurants in the United States, according to data from Technomic, a restaurant research firm. That's roughly 72,000 fewer than in 2019, when there were 703,000 restaurants in the country.

That number could fall even further this year, to about 630,000 locations, according to Technomic, which doesn't foresee the number of restaurants in the US returning to pre-Covid levels even by 2026.


Sit-down restaurants, especially, are at a disadvantage as delivery and takeout remain popular. And with inflation still high, some potential customers are avoiding restaurants to save money. Meanwhile, restaurant operators are seeing their own costs, like rent and ingredients, rise, and say it's hard to hire staff.

With conditions so tough, some restaurant owners are advising newcomers to steer clear of the industry altogether.

If someone were to ask David Nayfeld, chef and co-owner of the San Francisco restaurants Che Fico and Che Fico Alimentari, whether to open a new restaurant right now, his answer would be no.

"I would say it is not a good time to go open a restaurant if you are not a seasoned and incredibly durable operator," he said. Especially now, when restaurant operators need experience and deep pockets in order to succeed, he added.

Even Nayfeld, himself an industry veteran who has worked at the famed Eleven Madison Park, is struggling. The pandemic led to "a really devastating few years that we're still working our way out of," he said.

Some have argued that the contraction is a painful but necessary correction.

"The narrative back pre-pandemic was that we were over-saturated … too many restaurants chasing too few consumer dollars," said David Henkes, senior principal at Technomic.


Indeed, before the pandemic, the number of restaurants was growing between half a percent and one percent each year, he said, adding that the recent decline served to "reset" the size of the market. Without those hurdles, however, that decrease would likely have happened more slowly, he noted.

Daniel Jacobs, a chef and restaurant owner, has seen his own network of restaurants shrink over the past few years.

Prior to the pandemic, he and his business partner Dan Van Rite operated three restaurants and a bakery, plus a catering operation and restaurant consulting business. Today, they are left with two Milwaukee restaurants, DanDan and EsterEv.

"Closing a restaurant is an incredibly difficult decision to make," Jacobs said. "We did our best during the pandemic to try and keep our teams together … at some point, you just gotta call it."


The rise of takeout and delivery during the pandemic helped multiple restaurants survive the pandemic.

DanDan, a Chinese American restaurant, had offered takeout for years. The restaurant "had that customer confidence that we were going to deliver quality products," he said.

EsterEv is a tasting-menu-only restaurant within a restaurant (functionally, a dining room located inside DanDan) open only on weekends, and "definitely wouldn't have [made it] if we had to pay rent on a space," Jacobs said.

The trend toward delivery and takeout has stuck, with restaurants reporting higher levels of off-premise orders. According to Revenue Management Solutions, a restaurant consultancy, delivery was up 11.4% in fast food and fast casual restaurants in January compared to last year.

"We increasingly like to get our food on the go," said David Portalatin, food service industry advisor for the NPD Group, a market research firm. "We're still a more home-centric society."

Plus, sit-down restaurants tend to be more expensive, which could drive cash-strapped customers away, said Portalatin. Even with rising grocery prices, eating at home is generally less expensive than dining out, and restaurants last year saw their foot traffic dip.

Full-service restaurants are also more labor intensive. That's a problem right now, as restaurant owners report having a hard time hiring staff.

Job openings in accommodation and food services rose by 409,000 in December, the largest increase by sector for the month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said in February.

Demand for workers marks a turnaround from early in the pandemic, when restaurants let go of millions of staffers. Some employees also left of their own volition during the pandemic, afraid of getting sick with Covid-19 or tired of dealing with grueling conditions and rude customers.


Today, some of those workers haven't returned, leaving operators struggling to restaff.

"Fundamentally, the labor situation is one where … there's just not enough supply of qualified workers," Henkes said. "And restaurants are particularly vulnerable, because it's never been the industry of choice for a lot of people."

Some restaurants, Henkes said, "are very cognizant that they need to improve the working experience and what they're offering to employees," he said. "But doing that at scale for an industry is very hard."

And, of course, some major employers are not interested in higher wages for workers.

Chipotle, Starbucks, Chick-fil-A, McDonald's and KFC-owner Yum Brands, for example, have each donated $1 million to Save Local Restaurants, a coalition opposing a California law that could set minimum wage up to $22 an hour and codify working conditions for fast-food employees in the state.

Enviado do meu Galaxy

Stellantis invests $155 million in Argentine copper mine
por Reuters

Investing.com: Stock Market News / 2023-02-27 18:24



© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The logo of Stellantis, the world's fourth-largest automaker which starts trading in Milan and Paris after Fiat Chrysler and Peugeot maker PSA finalised their merger, is seen on a flag at the main entrance of FCA Mirafiori plant in Turin, Ital
ROME (Reuters) - Carmaker Stellantis said on Monday it had invested $155 million to buy a minority stake in a copper mine in Argentina as part of its global push to secure raw materials for electric vehicle batteries.

The company acquired a 14.2% stake in McEwen Copper, a subsidiary of Canada's McEwen Mining (NYSE:MUX), which owns the Los Azules project in Argentina.

The $155-million investment will make Stellantis the second-largest shareholder in McEwen Copper along with Rio Tinto (NYSE:RIO), it said in a statement.

Los Azules plans to produce 100,000 tons per year of cathode copper, a key component for car batteries, at 99.9% purity starting in 2027, the carmaker said.

Stellantis, the world's third-largest automotive group by sales, includes Italy's Fiat and Alfa Romeo, France's Peugeot (OTC:PUGOY) and Citroen, and U.S brands Jeep and Ram.

The group wants 100% of its European passenger carsales and 50% of its U.S. passenger car and light-duty trucksales to be battery electric vehicles by 2030.

In recent months, Stellantis has struck a series of accords to procure raw materials for electric batteries, including last month's nickel sulphate supply deal with Finland's Terrafame.

Enviado do meu Galaxy