April 1, 2024

Including link: https://asia.nikkei.com/

"MARKETS
Japan's NISA investments seen adding downward pressure on yen
Program could spur estimated $26bn in yearly yen-selling on foreign-asset demand


Japan's revamped Nippon Individual Savings Account program is fueling retail demand for foreign assets. (Photo by Ryutaro Yokoyama)
AKIRA INUJIMA and TOSHIHIRO SATO, Nikkei staff writers
February 3, 2024 05:48 JST
TOKYO -- Japanese retail investors are snapping up foreign assets through the revamped Nippon Individual Savings Accounts, stoking speculation that the tax-exempt investing program could contribute to further weakness in the yen.

"Every investor overseas knows about the revamped NISA," said a source at a brokerage. "Many are especially interested in the scale of yen-selling and dollar-buying tied to the program, and comparing it to Japan's trade deficit."

The NISA program has two components: "growth" accounts that can be used to invest in individual stocks, and tsumitate accounts intended for monthly investments in mutual funds. Up to 3.9 trillion yen ($26.3 billion) could be invested in overseas assets yearly across the two components, the Japan Research Institute said.


That yearly figure works out to 325 billion yen in potential yen-selling demand monthly. For comparison, Japan's trade deficit in December totaled 412.7 billion yen after seasonal adjustments.

"People tend to hold on to their monthly investments, particularly in foreign equities, over the long term, so we're unlikely to see profit-taking or other moves that drive demand for buying yen," said Soichiro Tateishi at JRI.

The Japanese government wants cumulative investments through NISA to reach 56 trillion yen by 2027. Assuming the figure grows around 5.2 trillion yen each year, JRI sees the program weakening the yen by up to 6 against the dollar by 2027.

The yen is expected to see greater depreciation pressure early in each month, based on investment trends tracked by Nikkei affiliate QUICK's Asset Management Research Center. Five major mutual funds that focus on foreign equities drew 339.1 billion yen in inflows in the first half of January, outpacing the 236.6 billion yen in the second half.

Investments made by the 15th of each month also accounted for 68% of the total before NISA's overhaul last month.

"Many people set up automatic investments for the 1st of the month, or otherwise on the 5th or the 10th," said Tomoichiro Kubota, senior market analyst at Matsui Securities.

The yen has been trading around 146 to 147 to the dollar, about 5 to 6 weaker than at the end of 2023, despite the spread in long-term interest rates between Japan and the U.S. remaining largely unchanged.

The marked depreciation in the yen since 2022 was largely driven by two factors: interest rate differentials between Japan and overseas, and the widening trade deficit.

But the yen has continued to weaken even as the interest rate spread settles and Japan's trade deficit declines, leading to views that the new NISA is a third factor putting downward pressure on the yen.

Unlike stock prices, which are connected to corporate performance, there are few indicators in the foreign exchange market to gauge whether prices are high or low. Currencies also often keep moving in a single direction.

"As more people become aware of the fact that households are selling yen, more people will sell yen based on that," said Daisuke Karakama, chief market economist at Mizuho Bank. "That's how the currency market works."

The U.S. Federal Reserve is expected to begin lowering interest rates by midyear, and the Bank of Japan is also expected to end its negative interest rate policy by April.

Market participants had predicted that the yen would appreciate in 2024, possibly to the 120 level against the dollar, as interest rate differentials narrow, but enthusiasm for overseas investment brought on by the new NISA may spur a rethink.



READ NEXT
Markets
Japan's revamped NISA investment program set for record month
Currencies
Yen softens to 148 against dollar on strong U.S. jobs report
Market Spotlight
Foreign traders, Chinese fuel Japan's market rally in new year
Markets
Japan stocks drew $10bn in net overseas buying in early 2024
Currencies
Yen is worst-performing G10 currency for 3rd straight year
Currencies
Yen's fair value seen around 140 to dollar amid narrowing rate gap
Opinion
Asia can reduce its dollar dependence but it won't be easy
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Opinion
China's Indian land grab has become a strategic disaster

China up close
Analysis: Xi-Putin honeymoon at risk as Chinese flood into…

Politics
U.K. royal Kate undergoes chemotherapy after 'huge…
Recommended by
Advertisement
[Free Webinar] NIKKEI FORUM Diversity & Innovation| March…
Partner content
How Japan is ushering in the future of healthcare | by…
Advertisement
[Learn More] Stay up to date with changes in the Asia…
LATEST ON MARKETS
Markets
Japan stock splits jump 60% as Fujitsu and Suzuki join bandwagon
Markets
Thai construction giant's shares plunge 30% after $29.5m loss
Markets
On topic: Why is the Japanese yen so weak?
SPONSORED CONTENT





About Sponsored Content
DISCOVER THE ALL NEW
NIKKEI ASIA APP

GET INSIGHTS ON ASIA IN YOUR INBOX
About UsContact UsSitemapHelpTerms Of UseCopyrightPrivacy & Cookie PolicyInformation TransmissionAdvertising
Nikkei Inc. No reproduction without permission.
"
https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Markets/Japan-s-NISA-investments-seen-adding-downward-pressure-on-yen#:~:text=MARKETS,reproduction%20without%20permission.




Enviado do meu Galaxy

March 10, 2024

Street Calls of the Week: Upgrade for Shake Shack; downgrade for Old Domion
por Investing.com

Investing.com: Stock Market News / 2024-03-10 08:3115
Published Mar 10, 2024 04:13AM ET

© Reuters.
Investing.com -- Here is your Pro Recap of the top takeaways from Wall Street analysts for the past week: upgrades for Shake Shack, G-III Apparel, Sea and Textron; downgrade for Old Dominion.

InvestingPro subscribers always get first dibs on market-moving rating changes.

G-III Apparel Group
What happened? On Monday, Barclays downgraded G-III Apparel (NASDAQ:) stock to Underweight with a $23 price target.

What's the full story? Barclays' downgrade is primarily driven by three factors: an anticipated 2% revenue headwind over a three-year period due to the announced Macy's store closures on 2/27/24, the impact of lost licenses on the business over the next five years, and the subdued search interest in owned brands, suggesting a longer timeframe to counterbalance revenue headwinds.

The investment bank remains confident that GIII will continue to seek license agreements with new brands. However, there is limited visibility into potential agreements, their commencement, and whether they could sufficiently replace the lost Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger businesses.

The analysts also believe that potential acquisitions beyond the core women's and outerwear businesses could introduce additional execution risk.

Underweight at Barclays means "The stock is expected to underperform the unweighted expected total return of the industry coverage universe over a 12-month investment horizon."

How did the stock react? GIII stock traded lower on the premarket headlines from $33.11 to $31.87, a decline of around 4.25%. GIII opened the regular session at $32.23 and closed at $29.73, a decline of 10.56%.

Sea Ltd.
What happened? On Tuesday, JPMorgan upgraded Sea Ltd (NYSE:) to Overweight with a $70 price target.

What's the full story? JPMorgan believes that in the current competitive environment, SE is likely to continue increasing ecommerce commissions while reducing the intensity of sales and marketing spend. The investment bank anticipates that ecommerce will likely drive positive earnings revisions for SE in the near-term.

However, the analysts also caution that the high take-rates could result in volatility in earnings expectations with changes in the competitive environment. This volatility in earnings outlook is likely to result in fluctuations in share price. JPMorgan recommends investors to trade these changes in earnings outlook. They believe earnings expectations are likely to see positive revisions in the near-term, driven by ecommerce.

Overweight at JPMorgan means "over the duration of the price target indicated in this report, we expect this stock will outperform the average total return of the stocks in the Research Analyst's, or the Research Analyst's team's, coverage universe."

How did the stock react? Sea Ltd. equity traded up on the premarket headline from $53.62 to $54.50. Investing.com Pro users had the information 5 minutes before other outlets reported it. Sea Ltd. opened the regular session at $54.32 and closed at $55.75, a gain of 3.43%.

Old Dominion
What happened? On Wednesday, BofA downgraded Old Dominion (NASDAQ:) to Neutral with a $446 price target.

What's the full story? BofA's downgrade is based upon limited upside to their price objective (PO) citing an elevated multiple and lagging volume growth. The investment bank has increased its PO to $446 from $443, based on 35.5x their 2024 EPS estimate, reflecting better-than-expected pricing from its mid-1Q24 update and earnings leverage as demand returns. Despite lowering their 2024 and 2025 EPS estimates each by 1% to $12.55 and $14.65 respectively, due to lower volume estimates,

BofA remains positive on leading carriers given the tight Less-than-Truckload (LTL) backdrop and potential earnings leverage as demand returns.

The analysts note that Old Dominion has distinguished itself as a best-in-class operator in the LTL segment of the trucking industry, increasing revenue and EPS at rates above the industry average and improving its operating ratio to an industry-best level. They believe ODFL can continue to gain market share given its high service levels. However, they view its upside as limited given its premium valuation multiple.

Neutral at BofA means "Neutral stocks are expected to remain flat or increase in value and are less attractive than Buy rated stocks."

How did the stock react? Old Dominion opened the regular session at $430.15 and closed at $435.46, a gain of 1.25%.

Shake Shack
What happened? On Thursday, TD Cowen upgraded Shake Shack (NYSE:) to Outperform with a $125 price target.

What's the full story? TD Cowen anticipates multi-year positive adjusted EBITDA revisions for Shake Shack, driven by an upside to 2024-26E restaurant level margins and G&A (General and Administrative expense). The investment bank believes that the brand's multi-pronged efficiency efforts and disciplined investing are underappreciated, and these factors are expected to drive positive EBITDA revisions.

Simultaneously, the hiring of a new CEO ushers in a narrative change and presents opportunities to improve traffic as the brand leverages its scale to embrace the next phase of the business curve.

The analysts increase their price target to $125 and designate shares as their top small to mid-cap and second overall pick. TD believes the hiring of a capable new CEO can help accelerate traffic, driving multiple expansion through upgraded marketing & operations, and progressing on the brand's digital journey. The analysts argue that Shake Shack should trade at a premium to the 5-year average EV/EBITDA multiple, similar to fast casual peers.

Outperform at TD Cowen means "The stock is expected to achieve a total positive return of at least 15% over the next 12 month."

How did the stock react? Shake Shack opened the regular session at $100.96 and closed at $104.44, a gain of 3.45%.

Textron
What happened? On Friday, BofA upgraded Textron (NYSE:) to Buy with a $105 price target.

What's the full story? BofA's valuation is rolled forward to use 2025 estimates, arriving at the PO by using a 0.90x relative P/E multiple (vs. prior 0.85x) to the 2025e market multiple. BofA wrote their higher multiple accounts for stronger Aviation performance despite the post-COVID demand decline, efforts to consolidate costs at Industrial, and a robust Systems pipeline that should materialize in stronger outyear growth. However, the relative multiple remains below the historical average of 0.95x due to perceived risks to Bell given its aging portfolio and possible budgetary cuts to the Future Vertical Lift (FVL) program.

The analysts believe Textron Aviation remains well positioned to benefit from further growth in business jet demand and swelling industry backlogs. Bell is seen as positioned to benefit from improving commercial helicopter demand, and the Future Long Range Assault-Aircraft program development.

Textron Systems is expected to benefit from increasing domestic and international defense budgets. Textron's strong balance sheet sets the scene for continued shareholder-friendly capital deployment through dividends and share buybacks according to BofA analysts.

Buy at BofA means "Buy stocks are expected to have a total return of at least 10% and are the most attractive stocks in the coverage cluster"

How did the stock react? TXT equity traded up on the premarket headlines from $90.28 to $92.05, a gain of 1.45%. Textron opened the regular session at $93.16 and closed at $92.13, a gain of 2%.





Enviado do meu Galaxy

January 1, 2024

Incluindo o link: https://www.forbes.com/

"

BUSINESS
RETAIL
Coupang Will Soon Discover Farfetch's Luxury Marketplace Is A Loser
Pamela N. Danziger
Senior Contributor
I study the world's most powerful consumers -- The American Affluent
Dec 30, 2023,10:04am EST

Close up female arm sending message on the phone [+]
GETTY
Farfetch Holdings, the online luxury marketplace and technology platform, reached the precipice of insolvency in the third quarter. A last-minute $500 million bridge loan from the $21 billion South Korea's Coupang gave the company a lifeline. Currently, Farfetch has a market value of $258.4 million.

Since going public in 2018, Farfetch has proven to be a black hole undone by grand ambitions without the discipline to achieve them, if that is even possible. Now Coupang is caught in its vortex and is destined to become its next victim.


The Deal
Under terms of the agreement, Farfetch will operate as a private company with Farfetch founder and CEO José Neves at the helm until the end of an exclusionary period expiring April 30, 2024. At that time, Farfetch will become a subsidiary of Coupang; otherwise, it must pay back the loan with 12.5% per annum interest.


Coupang is counting on the deal to go through. Farfetch makes an appealing acquisition since it opens the door to the $362 billion personal luxury goods market.

The company claims its home base of South Korea has the world's highest per capita spending on luxury. Yet South Korea is an also-ran behind North America and China, which account for about half of the world's luxury consumer spending.

Coupang, as an e-commerce marketplace platform with enhanced service offerings such as same-day and next-day delivery, believes its operations and logistical capabilities can turn the tide in Farfetch's business.

"We see tremendous opportunities to redefine the customer experience for luxury clients everywhere," said Born Kim, Coupang founder and CEO, in a statement, adding that Coupang is "uniquely positioned to unlock Farfetch's tremendous value."

It assumes Farfetch's "leading role in the luxury ecosystem" is a game-changer and that "online luxury is the future of luxury retail." Both of those assumptions have yet to be proven.

For example, online personal luxury sales actually declined from 2022 to 2023 for the first time, while mono-brand retail increased by 10%, according to Bain. And while Farfetch may be a player in luxury retail, it has hardly shaped a new luxury ecosystem. The leading luxury brands are doing that on their own.

After five years as a public company, reaching a market cap of $24 billion in early 2021, multimillion-dollar investments by Richemont, Alibaba and Kering, a strategic partnership with JD.com in China, operating UK-based Browns luxury boutique, acquiring Stadium Goods from LVMH Ventures and investing in Neiman Marcus Group, Farfetch has been spectacularly adept at losing money.

"It's a total financial fiasco," said Vijay Marolia, chief investment officer at Regal Point Capital Management, who noted his firm never took a position on Farfetch.

"People just stopped paying attention to the math on this one. A charismatic founder sold them an idea during a time when FOMO – fear of missing out – was rampant. The company didn't have a good business model; it had great marketing and PR," he added.

Full disclosure: I was also caught up in the excitement over Farfetch's potential.

Luxury Marketplace Concept Unproven
E-commerce marketplaces that use digital platforms to connect sellers with buyers have been remarkably successful. Alibaba, AmazonAMZN, eBayEBAY, Ratuken, JD.com and Coupang have proven as much.

In the U.S. alone, e-commerce marketplaces accounted for some $385 billion in sales, but the goods are typically offered at a significant discount to prices found in stores.


By contrast, luxury marketplaces are an unproven concept. Amazon has been trying to break through into luxury, but with little to show for it. And marketplace Matches Fashion, which the Fraser Group just acquired from private equity firm Apax Group for $66 million, has been losing money for years, with a reported loss of $43 million last year.

"For luxury brands, multi-brand marketplaces are the opposite of what an online strategy should be," shared Jacques Roizen, consulting managing director, Digital Luxury Group, China. "There's zero storytelling and a strong focus on discount. Their role is to help clear the stock of offline multi-brand retailers."

Early on, Richemont gave luxury marketplaces a try with Net-a-Porter and became a majority shareholder in 2010. Then it acquired YOOX in 2015 to merge the two companies together into YNAP.

Last year, YNAP brought in $2.8 billion in revenues and lost $4 billion as reported under discontinued operations. Plans to spin off a majority stake of YNAP to Farfetch were quashed with the Coupang deal.

MORE FOR YOU
A NASA Spacecraft Just Had A Close Encounter With A Volcanic Moon—See The Stunning First Image
Killing Russians By The Truckload Around Avdiivka, Ukraine's M-2 Fighting Vehicles Are Showing How Russia Loses—And Ukraine Wins
Samsung Insiders Confirm Three Stunning Galaxy S24 Ultra Decisions
Originally, Farfetch was a direct Net-a-Porter and YOOX competitor. Net-a-Porter was founded in 2000 by Natalie Massenet, who, after the Richemont acquisition, joined Farfetch in 2017 as co-chairman, leaving in 2020. YOOX was also founded in 2000, and both provided a model that Farfetch copied at its founding in 2007.


"Many luxury brands are realizing that selling online is very impersonal and too transactional. So very few luxury brands want to see their merchandise sold in a marketplace environment, discounted deeply and without any storytelling that goes along with luxury consumption," Roizen continued.

Luxury Is A Business Of Relationships, Not Transactions
In the Farfetch 2018 IPO prospectus, Neves included a letter specifying the differences between running a transactional-oriented marketplace and a luxury one.

"The luxury industry has many peculiarities. It is mostly comprised of family-owned businesses. Even the largest conglomerates, with few exceptions, are controlled by families, and the vast majority of brands and retailers are family-run," he wrote.

Given the unique family structure in the luxury market, "Relationships are paramount, and relationships take time to build," he rightly asserted, as the company warned it experienced losses from 2015 through 2017 and fully expected to continue to experience losses in the future because of those relationship-build times.


Yet he should have recognized such relationships can be destroyed in an instant. That's the place Farfetch finds itself in now. Neves and Farfetch have burned their bridges, and even under new ownership, it is going to take a monumental effort to restore the luxury industry's goodwill.

Mytheresa, the German online multi-brand retailer, that trades as MYT Netherlands Parent B.V., stands ready to grow deeper relationships with the luxury brands that have abandoned Farfetch and YNAP.

Its goodwill is growing after hosting capsule collections for some of the industry's leading brands, including Moncler, Valentino, Loro Piana, Dolce & Gabbana, Bottega Veneta, Gucci, Pucci, Loewe, Givenchy, Brunello Cucinelli, The Row, Missoni and Manolo Blahnik.

Mytheresa carefully distances itself from marketplaces under what it calls a "curated platform model." That is, it curates products like a department store and holds inventory in its warehouse for immediate shipment, but doesn't own the products. Instead, it books a fee from sellers after the sale.


Of note, Mytheresa was initially owned by Neiman Marcus Group, but was spun off during NMG's bankruptcy in 2020, so it shares some of Neiman Marcus DNA.

Sales, Not Profits
Luxury players and the investment community got caught in Farfetch's web by its impressive topline performance. At the time of its IPO, Farfetch reported gross merchandise value of $910 million and revenues of $386 million. And it had the support of 989 sellers – 614 retailers and 375 brands –and nearly one million customers.

In 2021, its peak year, gross merchandise value reached $4.2 billion and revenues of $2.3 billion on relationships with over 1,400 sellers and 3.7 million customers.

That year was also the first time it generated a profit of $1.5 billion and positive adjusted EBITDA of $1.6 billion, a 0.1% EBITDA margin. It was also in February of that year when Farfetch reached its maximum market cap of $24 billion.

Then, the tide started to turn, with its market cap dropping to around $5 billion in March 2022 and continued to dive. Fiscal 2022 saw gross merchandise value down 4%, to $4.1 billion, while revenues inched up 3% to $2.3 billion, but profits dropped to $345 million and adjusted EBITDA declined to -$99 million with an adjusted EBITDA margin of -4.9%.


During 2021 and 2022, Farfecth's gross profit margin was over 40%; by contrast, luxury brands in the fashion sector boast a profit margin of just under 70%, according to Capstone Partners. And EBITDA margin performance is in the 25% range, while Farfetch's has been in negative territory.

"Farafetch has continuously been losing money before they even pay their debt and before they pay taxes," Regal Point's Marolia observed, and he added the most important "tell" on Farfetch's balance sheet is its cash flows.

"It sounds overly simplistic, but you've got to follow the cash. Cash flows from operations prove whether it's a 'legit' company with a good business model or not. Year in, year out, Farfetch has a negative cash flow from operations," he said.

For example, in 2021, it reported a $476 million loss in cash flows from operating activities. That increased to a $847 million loss in 2022.

Marolia describes the company as engaged in "shenanigans" regarding its reporting. A case in point is the second quarter 2023 earnings report from August 17, when the company was unraveling.


"Our Q2 results show Farfetch is growing, becoming more efficient and executing on our key strategic priorities," Neves said in the statement. "2023 is set up to be a great year for Farfetch, toward strong GMV growth, adjusted EBITDA profitability and positive free cash flow."

Then a turn of the page shows gross profit margins were down from 46.2% in second quarter 2022 to 42.5% in 2023 and the company had a profit loss of $281 million, adjusted EBITDA down to -$31 million and adjusted EBITDA margin of -6.4%, off from -4.9% previous year. Cash flow losses from operating activities during the first six months ending June mounted from $329 million in 2022 to $406 million in 2023.

"There were a lot of red flags over the years, if you were reading the transcripts and studying the financial statements to put all the clues together," Marolia said.

"I believe Neves started with a good idea and people got caught up in the sentiment. Any institution is made up of human beings, even high-frequency trading algorithms are designed by people. Getting emotional and excited by investing is a really good way to lose money," he shared.

Uncharted Waters
In trying to enter the luxury market, Coupang is getting into uncharted waters and may quickly discover it is in way over its head. Its transactionally-oriented flagship business has little to no connection with the luxury market, where consumers don't just buy products, but fulfill their dreams.


"Farfetch never was, and never ever will be, a luxury brand. Never," shared Luxury Institute's Milton Pedraza on Linkedin. The marketplace concept doesn't appeal to high-net-worth customers – the lifeblood of any luxury brand – who want to be romanced in the store.

While some consumers are drawn to the convenience of online transactions, it's not the chosen path to purchase for the truly affluent clientele on which luxury brands' legacy businesses are built.

The luxury marketplace concept "is a business model that ultimately will never be profitable, burns a lot of cash and doesn't bring in the right luxury consumers," Pedraza concluded.

Get the best of Forbes to your inbox with the latest insights from experts across the globe.
Follow me on Twitter or LinkedIn. Check out my website or some of my other work here. 

Pamela N. Danziger
Speaker, author, and market researcher Pamela N. Danziger is internationally recogni… Read More
Editorial Standards
Corrections
Reprints & Permissions


More From Forbes
Canadian Push For Final St-Rémy Cask-Finish Brandy And New Art Edition
Retail 2024: Target, Nike, Victoria's Secret Go Local And Get Personal
Following This Simple Influencer Strategy Can Skyrocket Your Business
Merchandise Returns Drop 9% But Fraud Expected To Rise
Nike Will Lay-Off 700 Jobs
Temu's Blazing Run Could Falter In 2024 With Changes To Unpopular Tax Break

Online Retailer Zulily Shuts Down After Only 7 Months Under New Ownership



© 2024 Forbes Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
AdChoicesPrivacy StatementDo Not Sell My Personal InformationDigital Terms of SaleTerms of ServiceContact UsReport a Security IssueJobs At ForbesReprints & PermissionsForbes Press RoomAdvertise"
https://www.forbes.com/sites/pamdanziger/2023/12/30/coupang-will-soon-discover-farfetchs-luxury-marketplace-is-a-loser/#:~:text=BUSINESS,Advertise




Enviado do meu Galaxy

Want to know more?

Must have books!!!