March 17, 2023

UBS Reportedly In Talks to Acquire Credit Suisse
por Tyler Durden

Zero Hedge / 2023-03-17 21:477
UBS Reportedly In Talks to Acquire Credit Suisse
Just a few short hours ago, Bloomberg reported that UBS and Credit Suisse were both against any merger scenario.

Citing sources close to the matter, Bloomberg said UBS would prefer to focus on its own wealth-centric standalone strategy and is reluctant to take on risks related to Credit Suisse.


Well since then things haven't gone so well.

First, at least four major banks including Societe Generale and Deutsche Bank have placed restrictions on their trades involving Credit Suisse or its securities, Reuters reports, citing five unidentified people with direct knowledge of the matter.

Another source at a major global bank, who deals directly with Credit Suisse in Asia, said their bank had started asking the Swiss lender to gross settle, a trading scenario where the counterparty demands upfront payment from Credit Suisse instead of collecting later any money the Swiss lender might owe them as a result of the trade.

Another global bank has reduced its unsecured exposure to Credit Suisse, which includes all lending with no collateral, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. The bank is still providing repurchase agreements, which is secured lending.

This likely explains why the classic counterparty-risk hedge (1Y CDS) has barely budged despite the $50 billion liquidity injection from the SNB...



And second, given the continued collapse in Credit Suisse shares today (despite the billions from the SNB... and maybe even more from the ECB)...



...it appears a deal between the two Swiss banks could be on.

The Financial Times reports that, according to multiple people briefed on the talks, UBS is in discussions to take over all or part of Credit Suisse, with the boards of Switzerland's two biggest lenders set to meet separately over the weekend to consider Europe's most consequential banking combination since the financial crisis

The Swiss National Bank and regulator Finma are orchestrating the talks in an attempt to shore up confidence in the country's banking sector.

Swiss regulators told their US and UK counterparts on Friday evening that merging the two banks was their "plan A" to arrest a collapse in confidence in Credit Suisse, a person familiar with those discussions told the FT.

UBS has a market value of $65bn (CHF60bn), while shares in Credit Suisse closed on Friday with a value of $8bn (CHF7.4bn).



Will this be bank mega-merger weekend?

*  *  *

As we detailed earlier, we knew this was the endgame more than two weeks ago when we reported that "Credit Suisse Crashes To All Time Low After Boosting Deposit Rates To Reverse Bank Run" in which we reported that after a quarter of "staggering" bank runs, the second largest Swiss bank - clearly panicking - was offering a 6.5% annual rate on new three-month deposits of $5 million or above - and a rate as high as 7% for one-year deposits - far above matched maturity Bills, and suggesting that to attract a client, the bank is forced to eat a loss.

The hope, we explained, "was that after it attracts enough new clients, the bank will then be able to quietly lower the rates and make the new accounts profitable, however as the various DeFi blow ups of 2022 showed, it never quite works out that way."

This time was no different, and as the bank run accelerated, the Swiss bank ended up getting an (interim) $50 billion rescue financing from the SNB to cover the most recent deposit run, and it will get much more before it's all said and done. To underscore this point, two days ago - in our post summarizing the SNB bailout - we said that "this is a last-ditch liquidity infusion, and all it does is prevent forced asset liquidations (a la SVB). Meanwhile it does nothing to halt the depositor flight because once confidence is gone, it rarely returns."

Again we were right, and one day after the failed bailout attempt, Bloomberg writes that while the $54 billion lifeline won by Credit Suisse on Thursday gives it a fighting chance to rebuild its business, "some clients aren't waiting around to find out how that goes." To wit:

In Asia, several ultra-wealthy clients continued to cut back their exposure amid the tumult this week.
In the Middle East, some customers asked the bank to convert cash deposits into treasury bills and bonds.
An executive at a rival European bank said they're seeing some deposits shifting from Credit Suisse, although the amount isn't yet sizable.
Such attrition, Bloomberg notes redundantly, "will make the overhaul that Chief Executive Officer Ulrich Koerner and his team are overseeing that much harder." Because, at its heart, a successful bailout of Credit Suisse means halting the record historic run. Recall, the bank saw net outflows hit 110.5 billion francs ($119 billion) in the fourth quarter...



... and despite this week's rescue, the bank run is once again picking up, setting up the bank for another bailout because unless the SNB and the Swiss government want a historic bank implosion on their hands, they now have no choice but to keep throwing good money after bad.

For the CEO, hope still lives: "We want to get back all what we lost," Koerner said at an investor conference on Tuesday. "And once we are there, we go beyond and grow the business again."

The problem is getting "there." And while the bank has consistently said it has sufficient liquidity, "it isn't yet clear what the overall flows are or whether the backstop is helping attract clients back." Actually, it's clear it is not, which begs the question: if an SNB rescue isn't enough, what else can the bank do to restore confidence?

Not much: bankers are calling round clients to reassure them, primed with talking points sent out by executives or communicated at town halls. The lender is offering deposit rates that are significantly higher than rivals to win back funds, and even that is not working.

And as Bloomberg reports today, "some ultra-wealthy families booking out of Asia accelerated their retreat from the Swiss bank this week, according to three large single family offices that collectively manage billions and multiple private bankers based across Hong Kong and Singapore."

One family office in the region is planning to cut back as much as 30% of its money parked with the embattled bank after the wealth manager was unable to assure it that non-Swiss clients would be protected in the event of a collapse, Bloomberg reports citing an unnamed person.

Some clients in the Middle East asked the bank to convert their cash deposits into fixed income securities, giving them more comfort to keep money with the firm, according to another person familiar with the matter. In Germany, a wealth manager received inquiries from Credit Suisse clients looking to shift deposits to his firm

To be sure, some clients are still optimistic:

Others are less concerned, with one adviser to several trusts saying he's recommended they keep their deposits at Credit Suisse even though they far exceed the amounts covered by the country's deposit insurance. He said he's convinced there's no risk because the Swiss government will never let the firm fail.

Then again, SVB's corporate clients were also optimistic the bank would never fail.... until it did.

The bottom line for CS: "outflows haven't reversed as of this month, though they have stabilized at much lower levels, according to the bank's annual report released Tuesday, the same day Koerner said on Bloomberg Television that the bank had seen inflows on Monday."

A day later, his bank's shares plunged after its biggest shareholder ruled out adding to its stake, unnerving investors already on edge after three regional US banks failed in a span of days.  It's not like the bank won't lie to restore confidence. Last month Reuters reported that Switzerland's financial regulator is reviewing comments by Credit Suisse Chairman Axel Lehmann made in December on outflows from the company having "stabilized", on the basis that they may have been misleading. In other words, the bank's highest official was lying on the record, just to slow down the bank run.

The support of Credit Suisse's counterparties will also be critical, and here too cracks are emerging: the biggest banks in the US have been paring down their direct exposure to Credit Suisse for months as it stumbled from one crisis to the next. Firms including JPMorgan, Bank of America and Citigroup have told regulators their exposures are now minimal. And then, earlier this week, Paris-based BNP Paribas also moved to trim its exposure telling clients that it will no longer accept so-called novations where BNP is asked to step in on derivatives contracts where Credit Suisse is a counterparty, Bloomberg reported.

And with every passing day, doubts grow. JPMorgan. analyst Kian Abouhossein wrote in a note (available to pro subscribers) that the "status quo is no longer an option," laying out three possible scenarios for Credit Suisse and saying that a takeover is the most likely. However, shortly after Bloomberg reported that "both lenders are opposed to a forced combination."

Any such move could be followed by a listing or spinoff of the Swiss unit. Other possibilities mooted in the note included the Swiss National Bank stepping in with a full deposit guarantee or Credit Suisse's entire investment bank being shuttered.

While executives insist such drastic solutions aren't needed now the backstop is in place, they are dead wrong since the deposit run is once again picking up. Meanwhile, the bank is claiming that its strategic revamp announced in October remains the core plan to turn around the bank, they say, with the bank's offer to buy back debt underlining its core strength.

"We see it as preventive liquidity so that we can carry out the transformation of Credit Suisse and continue to work well in this turbulent situation," Swiss bank head Andre Helfenstein said in an interview with national broadcaster SRF on Thursday.

It adds up to a finely balanced situation. With camera crews gathering Thursday outside of Credit Suisse's stone-clad headquarters on Zurich's moneyed Paradeplatz, CEO Koerner urged staff to stay focused.

"Effective communication is key to ensure that our clients and external stakeholders understand the strengths of the bank, our strategy and the accelerated progress we are making to create the new Credit Suisse," he said in a memo.

So far the only thing the bank has communicated clearly is that it has no clear vision of how it will emerge from the current crisis while preserving depositor confidence.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/17/2023 - 17:34
Fed Balance Sheet, Deposits, Hotel California & TINA
por Tyler Durden

Zero Hedge / 2023-03-17 13:5836
Fed Balance Sheet, Deposits, Hotel California & TINA
By Peter Tchir of Academy Securities

This is, broadly speaking, a follow-up to yesterday's Liquency & Solvidity piece, where we took a hard close look at what the U.S., Europe and Switzerland have done so far in response to pressures on banks.

No surprise here, but while banks borrowed a record $152 billion from the discount window, they "only" borrowed $11.9 billion from the new Bank Term Lending Program (BTLP).


I expect BTLP to get little use, because it is a bit like the Hotel California, you can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.

Using that facility means that you are replacing low cost deposits for roughly market priced funding. A strain on NIM that erodes capital – not ideal. It also means that you have long dated, low dollar price bonds, presumably long enough and in big enough size, that this method of funding is preferable to others. Not a winning combination. The discount window, is temporary and a true "stop gap" measure, so it makes sense banks use that, rather than the new BTLP.

I could be wrong on BTLP, but if I see that increase, I would be selling bank shares, because that really is a facility of last resort, as it is currently designed, and I believe users will experience a Hotel California type of existence.

Which brings us to deposits.

A consortium of banks are going to deposit $30 billion with FRC. This is interesting on many levels, and there are a lot of details that I don't know, but here are the quick takes:

FRC, from various reports, didn't have many assets eligible for BTLP, which is maybe why they needed an alternative source? So it doesn't prove my point that BTLP takedown will be low, but it doesn't refute it either.

We don't know the rate FRC is paying on the deposits. If it is a rate typical of deposits, then it might demonstrate how unappealing it is for banks to have to replace deposits with high cost funds. IF it is a rate that low, then the banks providing the deposits are foregoing significant interest (in addition to in theory taking credit risk, as the point was made that these are "unsecured" deposits). If it is a market rate, then that has some different implications.

We don't know if this provides money to buy new assets, or merely covers deposits that have been removed from FRC. New deposits, at low rates, letting them buy more assets to generate NIM would help generate equity capital for the bank and be interesting.

Lots we don't know about the deposits and the details will be important to determining the impact. The deposits, in any case, are a new and interesting twist to this period of banking weakness and are a step towards the "private solution" that I think will be needed to really get us over the hump.

Fed Balance Sheet, FOMC and TINA
The Fed balance sheet has grown, significantly, even with QT continuing.



Rate hike probabilities for the FOMC have dropped from a split between 25 & 50, to a split between 0 and 25. I'm leaning towards zero, but a lot can change between now and then (let's be honest, with current headlines and low liquidity, things can change between the time I hit send and the time you receive this in your inbox!).

There is some discussion that the Fed could suspend the current balance sheet reduction activity (or maybe it is just me musing on it). I doubt this happens, but they could mention it as a tool, during the press conference, which would be "risk-on".

So, is it back to TINA (There Is No Alternative)?

Yes, the balance sheet has grown, but using the discount window has nothing like the impact large scale asset purchases had.

Yes, the Fed is close to being done hiking, but rates are nowhere near zero, so are not the headwind they were.

I think the TINA case is weak at best. Any balance sheet growth is likely to be temporary. There are legitimate concerns that financial conditions will tighten. While the SVB depositors were saved, I'm seeing little evidence of a rush to fund and to spend money (the drumbeat of tech layoffs continues).

This is still a trader's market and it is time to be cautious on risk broadly after the strength of yesterday.

Tyler Durden Fri, 03/17/2023 - 09:36
While Yellen Assures, Banks Run
RSSOpinion / 2023-03-16 22:511


Speaking to the Senate Finance Committee on Mar. 16, 2023, the Treasury Secretary defended the Biden administration and Federal Reserve's response to the collapse of two U.S. banks. Images: Shutterstock/Bloomberg News Composite: Mark Kelly

Janet Yellen offered more assurances Thursday that U.S. banks are safe and sound—and we doubt even the Treasury Secretary believes it. Certainly no one else does. The biggest American banks had to commit $30 billion on Thursday to rescue First Republic Bank—15 years to the day since Bear Stearns's collapse. Happy anniversary!

The San Francisco-based bank's shares have lost 70% since last Wednesday, and its credit rating has been downgraded to junk. First Republic investors and depositors haven't been soothed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.'s guarantee of uninsured deposits at Silicon Valley ( SVB ) and Signature banks, or the Federal Reserve's new emergency lending facility.

More troubling, a $70 billion liquidity lifeline offered by J.P. Morgan and others over the weekend appears to have been insufficient. If First Republic's problems go deeper than liquidity, the risks in the U.S. banking system may be bigger than regulators recognized and could grow if the economy slows.

First Republic caters to the affluent in California's Bay Area, Los Angeles, Boston and New York. About two-thirds of its deposits are uninsured and thus susceptible to a run if customers lose confidence. Wealthy customers were pulling deposits even before SVB failed.

The SVB blowup accelerated the flight, and the Fed's emergency lending facility was intended to help banks ride out a run. At the same time the FDIC guarantee of uninsured SVB and Signature deposits under its "systemic risk exception" was supposed to prevent contagion by creating an implicit backstop at other banks. Fed data show banks borrowed $164.8 billion from two Fed backstop facilities in the most recent week, but the panic is still on.

One reason is that only 15% of First Republic's $212.6 billion in assets are investment securities, mostly made up of municipal bonds. By contrast, most of SVB's assets consisted of U.S. government or mortgage-backed securities, which bear a duration risk if interest rates rise, but can also easily be liquidated in a crunch.

Muni bonds have the advantage of being tax-exempt and bear a low-risk weighting for the purposes of calculating capital to meet regulatory standards. Regulators also deem muni bonds "high-quality liquid assets"—except they're really not. Most muni bonds are held by households and mutual funds and are thinly traded on the secondary market.

Muni bonds have a similar duration risk to other long-dated government securities but can't be rapidly sold to redeem deposits. The Fed's emergency lending facility also doesn't accept most muni bonds as collateral, and First Republic holds few securities that it can borrow against at the central bank's new super-duper discount window.

Most of the bank's assets consist of commercial and residential real-estate loans. "Our loan portfolio is concentrated in single family residential mortgage loans, including non-conforming, adjustable-rate, initial interest-only period and jumbo mortgages," its investor report warns, adding these may be vulnerable to defaults as interest rates rise. Uh-oh.

Defaults on commercial real-estate loans have been increasing, especially in First Republic's chief lending markets. Housing prices have crashed in California's Bay Area to near pre-pandemic levels, and tech layoffs raise another credit risk. The risk of loan losses could explain the government's rush to shore up First Republic with a capital infusion.

Like SVB, First Republic benefited from the Federal Reserve's zero-interest rates and quantitative easing, which caused deposits from its wealthy customers to soar. It used these deposits to fund loans that appeared safe at the time but now look much less so. Markets today are enforcing more discipline.

This is another illustration of how the Dodd-Frank regulatory apparatus has failed. Democrats blame the 2018 bipartisan banking reform, which freed regional banks from many burdensome regulations applied to the big banks. But First Republic's Tier 1 leverage ratio is greater than that of most big banks, though it still may not be enough to absorb losses.

The underlying problem is that the Fed's modern monetary experiment and Dodd-Frank regulation distorted bank balance sheets. Vulnerabilities are emerging as the Fed corrects its inflationary mistakes. The more the Biden Administration insists the economy and banking system are A-ok when they're manifestly not, the more markets get nervous.

To adapt Taylor Swift, banks might be okay, but they're not fine at all.

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Want to know more?

Must have books!!!