March 3, 2023

How Dividend Investors Can Pick the Right Companies
Yahoo! Finance: Top Stories / 2023-03-03 16:401


Investors have been gravitating toward dividend-paying stocks and the mutual funds and exchange-traded funds that buy them. They're betting that if the stock market has another rocky year, it will pay to own stocks that are at least throwing off dividends.

The question is which companies investors can rely on to keep paying dividends.

During the pandemic, just under 200 companies stopped paying dividends to save cash. Over the past three years, many of them have resumed dividend payments—but some haven't, and according to the latest Global Dividend Index from Janus Henderson, overall dividend growth is expected to slow to 2.3% in 2023.

Now, even as the economy continues to emerge from the worst of the pandemic disruptions, persistent inflation and higher interest rates are stressing companies' balance sheets, which can discourage dividend payments. A handful of companies have recently announced plans to cut their dividends.

Max Wasserman, founder and senior portfolio manager at Chicago-based Miramar Capital, says that many of the indefinite pauses and recent cuts to dividends are a result of poor capital-allocation strategies.

"What you're seeing are companies that have increased their payout ratio to such a high extent that any interruption in their business model has put their dividends in jeopardy," Mr. Wasserman says. "Some companies have been stretching their balance sheets to remain dividend 'aristocrats' or to stay on the radar of mutual funds and dividend investors, and it's hit their cash flows. With higher debt costs, inflation and uncertainty, they've made the decision to cut the dividend in response."

Antonio DeSpirito, lead portfolio manager of the BlackRock Equity Dividend portfolios, says the timing of a dividend cut can tell investors about the underlying health of a company. "Work that we have done on this shows that if a business is making an out-of-business-cycle cut, that can be a sign of danger. That usually means there's some long-term secondary issue at a company. The stock is less likely to recover," he says. "If you see a business cut during a downturn, there is a better chance that stock is going to recover."

Look for sustainability
So, what should dividend investors look for in a company? R. Burns McKinney, managing director and senior portfolio manager at Dallas-based NFJ Investment Group, says investors should look at cash flow alongside the company's dividend. It can be tempting to look for the biggest dividends or the highest dividend yields, but cash flow is a metric of sustainability, he says.

Are you bullish on dividend stocks? Why or why not? Join the conversation below.

"The best dividend companies are the ones that have thought it through and have a philosophy behind what they are doing with their dividend," he says. "This should be rooted in current cash flow and their expectations for business growth over time."

Both Messrs. McKinney and Wasserman argue that high-quality dividend payers should raise dividends meaningfully year over year, ideally keeping pace with inflation. Capital-allocation strategies should also account for the possibility of an economic slowdown or recession, they say. For 2023, both expect that high-quality dividend payers will increase payouts despite the pressure on corporate balance sheets from inflation and debt costs.

"The increases may not be sky high," Mr. Wasserman says. "If a company has been raising the dividend by 5%, you might see them do 3% this year. But we expect to see increases, if that's the path they have been on."

A variety of strategies
For fund investors, dividend funds could provide some protection in the current market environment, says Daniel Sotiroff, a senior analyst at Morningstar Research Services, a unit of Morningstar Inc. "When you are focused on companies that are growing the dividend, that tends to mean that these are highly profitable companies. Investing in them can be a defensive investment in times of uncertainty," he says. Last year, dividend funds were down 6.68% on average, compared with a 19.4% decline in the S&P 500 index, according to Morningstar.

Investors can pursue several different strategies with dividend funds. There are funds with a broad scope, such as Invesco Dividend Income Fund (FSTUX), which invests across sectors, in companies including longtime dividend payers like Johnson & Johnson and Bank of America Corp. It has an expense ratio of 0.66%.

Dividend-yield funds invest in companies that pay dividends at a higher rate than a specified benchmark index. Aniket Ullal, head of ETF data and analytics at CFRA Research, says these funds give investors the option of taking more of a sector view, as many of them invest primarily in one or two sectors.

Vanguard offers a dividend-appreciation strategy, through its Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The fund tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, which includes only companies with a record of increasing their dividends. The fund holds all of the stocks in the index and has an expense ratio of 0.06%.

"Each of these strategies are going to play different roles in a portfolio," Mr. Ullal says. "There can be a trade-off when you focus on yields, because you increase the concentration risk in a portfolio. Each investor will have to decide if that is worth it to them."

Ms. McCann is a writer in New York. She can be reached at reports@wsj.com.

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Enclosures

01d4a5e17e3dd79125f37eca204370e7




Enviado do meu Galaxy

How Russia's War On Ukraine Is Altering Global Crude Oil Trade
por OilPrice.com

Oilprice.com / 2023-03-03 17:045


The conflict between Ukraine and Russia has disrupted crude tanker flows.
Midsize crude tankers have benefited from the disruption, leading to higher profits.
The ban on seaborne imports from Russia has caused an unusual transport pattern for U.S. crude exports.
The Ukraine-Russia war has rerouted crude tanker flows over the past year, equating to higher profits for shipowners. But the upside is not evenly spread. Midsize crude tankers have been the big beneficiaries.

It's not only that Russian crude export terminals can't handle larger tankers. A highly unusual transport pattern for U.S. crude exports has emerged, creating another war-induced headwind for owners of larger tonnage.

VLCCs cannibalize trans-Atlantic trade

Prior to the war, U.S. crude exports to Europe were loaded aboard midsize Aframaxes (tankers with capacity of 750,000 barrels) and Suezmaxes (1 million barrels). U.S. crude exports to Asia were loaded aboard very large crude carriers (VLCCs; 2 million barrels).

Europe hiked its crude imports from the U.S. in the wake of the invasion, replacing seaborne imports from Russia, which have been banned since Dec. 5.

Much of Europe's incremental volume from the U.S. has moved aboard VLCCs, not midsize tankers — a transport model that was extremely rare before Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 

"Virtually all the additional [U.S.] sales to Europe were done on VLCCs," wrote Erik Broekhuizen, manager of marine research at Poten & Partners, in a report Friday.

Tanker demand is measured in ton-miles: volume multiplied by distance. If ships switch to shorter routes, it's a negative for demand, and thus, for spot rates.

VLCCs have "cannibalized" the shorter-haul U.S.-Europe business of Aframaxes and Suezmaxes. Simultaneously, China has increased imports from Russia, limiting Chinese demand for longer-haul U.S. exports. Both are negative for VLCC voyage distance.

"The problem is that more VLCCs are arriving in the Atlantic than leaving," said ship brokerage BRS on Monday. "The latest data suggests that 108 VLCCs are currently trading west of Suez and that more are arriving every day, making the Atlantic crude tanker market more competitive.

"Preliminary information suggests that the number of VLCCs transporting U.S. crude to Europe could hit a record over the coming weeks," BRS said.

VLCCs now 'world's largest shuttle tankers'
Changes in crude trade patterns since the war "have benefited the midsize sectors given that the main Russian load ports in the Baltic, the Black Sea and the Far East are all inaccessible to VLCCs," explained Kevin Mackay, CEO of Teekay Tankers (NYSE: TNK), during a conference call Thursday.

Clarksons Securities estimated Monday that spot rates of non-eco-designed VLCCs were $59,700 per day. That's a highly profitable rate, but Suezmaxes — with half the carrying capacity of VLCCs — were earning $65,600 per day.

"VLCCs are now regularly cannibalizing multiple cargoes that would usually be transported on two Suezmaxes or three Aframaxes," said BRS, noting that VLCCs are more competitive than midsized tankers on a dollar-per-ton basis.

Consequently, VLCCs have become "the world's largest shuttle tankers," BRS said.

Lars Barstad, CEO of Frontline (NYSE: FRO), said during a conference call Tuesday, "With the situation around oil being redirected from Russia, you're basically seeing both Aframaxes and Suezmaxes getting drawn into that trade. That's giving VLCCs an opportunity to enter [midsize tanker] markets.

"VLCCs have started trading Suezmax stems [cargoes]. So right now, you're seeing a high number of fixtures where VLCCs are stepping in to what you'd typically call a Suezmax trade — U.S. Gulf to UK Continent [Europe], for example. Various asset classes are eating into each other's business segments."

More 'reverse lightering' in US Gulf
U.S. Gulf ports do not have the water depth to accommodate fully loaded VLCCs. Instead, these cargoes are "reverse lightered." They are loaded first on Aframaxes or Suezmaxes, with the oil then moved to VLCCs via ship-to-ship transfers.

"Since the cannibalization trend arrived in mid-2022, charterers have become better at utilizing infrastructure in the U.S. Gulf," explained BRS. "[They are] part-loading in ports and booking reverse lightering in advance to more efficiently load VLCCs."

BRS also pointed out the increased use of VLCCs for shorter-haul shipments to Europe is tying up more Aframaxes and Suezmaxes in reverse-lightering duties in the U.S. Gulf, another plus for midsize tanker rates.

China favoring Russian crude over US crude
The U.S.-China crude trade, because of its extreme distance, is a key variable in global VLCC demand. It takes seven weeks to travel from the U.S. to China via the Cape of Good Hope at 13 knots.

According to BRS, "Long-haul U.S. crude exports remained relatively flat year on year [in 2022], which, when viewed in the context of the surge in total U.S. crude exports, was viewed as disappointing, especially by VLCC owners."

U.S. crude shipments to China averaged around 200,000 barrels per day last year, in line with 2021 volumes. They have remained at the same level in the first two months of this year.

"Considering the backdrop of steadily rising Chinese crude runs, this suggests that U.S. barrels have been losing out to soaring imports of cut-price Russian barrels," said BRS. (Crude shipments from Russia to China are mainly shipped aboard the so-called "shadow fleet," comprising vessels with opaque ownership that do not trade in Western markets.)

Broekhuizen of Poten is optimistic on U.S.-China crude flows in the remainder of this year. "We expect more crude exports from the U.S. Gulf in 2023, [and] we anticipate that less of the incremental barrels will go to Europe," he said. "This means that more crude may find its way to Asia, especially to China.

"For the VLCC markets, this means more tonnage will likely be employed on the long-haul routes to Asia, boosting ton-mile demand and freight rates. As a result, we expect VLCCs will become less competitive in the trans-Atlantic trade and Suezmaxes and Aframaxes will regain market share."

Earnings roundup
On Tuesday, Frontline reported net income of $240.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2022 versus $19.8 million in Q4 2021. Adjusted earnings of 97 cents per share came in below the consensus estimate of $1.08. The latest period was Frontline's best quarter since Q2 2008.

Frontline owns VLCCs, Suezmaxes, Aframaxes and product tankers. Its spot VLCCs earned an average of $63,200 per day in Q4 2022, nearly four times rates a year ago. The company has 87% of its available VLCC days booked for Q1 2023 at $58,300 per day.

Also on Tuesday, International Seaways reported net income of $218.4 million for Q4 2022 compared to a loss of $34 million in Q4 2021. Adjusted earnings of $4.21 per share came in much higher than the consensus forecast for $3.92. The latest period was the best quarter since the company's listing in 2016.

International Seaway's owns a fleet of VLCCs, Suezmaxes, Aframaxes and product tankers. Its spot VLCCs earned an average of $64,596 per day in the latest quarter, compared to $14,326 per day the year before. It has 83% of its available spot VLCCs days for Q1 2023 booked at $46,600 per day.

By Greg Miller of FreightWaves via Zerohedge.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:






Enviado do meu Galaxy

Explainer: Biotech corn and soy widely used, consumers still wary of GM wheat
por Reuters

Investing.com: Stock Market News / 2023-03-03 19:095


© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: An agricultural worker operates a tractor with a seeder to sow wheat on farmland in Comodoro Py, on the outskirts of Buenos Aires, Argentina June 21, 2022. Picture taken June 21, 2022. REUTERS/Matias Baglietto
By Julie Ingwersen

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Nearly all corn and soybean acres in the world's largest exporting countries are seeded with genetically modified varieties, but that is not the case for wheat, a crop grown primarily for human food.

Biotech varieties of corn and soy, used for animal feed, biofuels and ingredients like cooking oil, were introduced in 1996 and soon came to dominate plantings in the United States as well as Brazil and Argentina, the world's top suppliers.

But genetically modified wheat has never been grown for commercial purposes due to consumer fears that allergens or toxicities could emerge in a staple used worldwide for bread, pasta and pastries.

Now, growing concerns about a possible global food crisis being triggered by climate change and war in Ukraine may be chipping away at opposition.

Argentine biotech company Bioceres is shaking up the status quo by developing wheat genetically modified to better tolerate drought, positioning itself ahead of larger global companies that are still steering clear.

Brazil has become the second country in the world after Argentina to approve the cultivation of genetically modified wheat, after a request from a Bioceres partner.

Because wheat is traded in a global marketplace, the threat of trade disruptions due to GM fears can be significant, as U.S. and Canadian wheat growers know well.

Two decades ago, Monsanto (NYSE:) Co was working to commercialize wheat bred to withstand treatments of its weed-killer Roundup, but the company halted that effort in 2004. International buyers had threatened to boycott U.S. wheat if the product was introduced to the marketplace. Monsanto was purchased by Bayer AG (ETR:) in 2018.

Monsanto's experimental wheat was supposed to have been destroyed or stored securely. However, small patches of Roundup-resistant wheat plants emerged years later in several U.S. states, including Oregon in 2013, Montana in 2014 and Washington in 2016 and 2019 as well as Canada's Alberta province in 2017.

The findings prompted importers, including Japan and South Korea, to suspend imports of North American wheat until they could confirm that no unapproved strains had entered commercial channels.

Attitudes toward genetically modified crops vary around the world. China, a top world buyer of soy and corn, allows GM crops in imported feed grains but only recently began to approve GM varieties for cultivation.

Germany, home to seed giants Bayer (OTC:) and BASF, imports GM soy. But domestic opposition to biotech crops is strong enough that these companies conduct their crop research abroad.

Australia grows and exports GM cotton and canola, and the country in May approved Bioceres' biotech wheat for use in foods.

Mexico, among the largest buyers of U.S. corn, has said it will halt GM corn imports for human consumption, but walked back a deadline to ban the corn for animal feed.

In the United States, some producers and wheat industry leaders have expressed interest in using biotechnology to boost wheat's profitability and appeal to farmers.

In the quarter-century since genetically modified corn and soybeans were introduced, overall U.S. plantings of those crops expanded by 13% and 37%, respectively, while U.S. wheat plantings fell by 37%, hitting the lowest in more than 100 years in 2020, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data.

The majority of biotech corn and soybean crops are modified for insect resistance and herbicide tolerance, traits that some wheat growers would like to access. Bioceres' drought-tolerant wheat, known as HB4, adds another element to the mix.

Recent disruptions to global wheat supplies have brought a new degree of urgency to the debate over biotech wheat.

Two trade groups, U.S. Wheat Associates and the National Association of Wheat Growers, support "the eventual commercialization" of biotech wheat, according to their websites, provided that plans are implemented to minimize market disruptions.





Enviado do meu Galaxy

Can AMD Stock Break Out as a Big Investor Takes a Stake?
Yahoo! Finance: Top Stories / 2023-03-03 21:39



Chip stocks are in focus on Friday, for more reasons than one.

First, Broadcom  (AVGO) - Get Free Report is trading to new 2023 highs as the company reported better-than-expected earnings and strong guidance.

Second, Advanced Micro Devices  (AMD) - Get Free Report is in focus as Dan Loeb's Third Point reportedly has a passive stake in the firm.

While we've seen a lot of activist noise in stocks like Salesforce  (CRM) - Get Free Report, that doesn't appear to be the case with Loeb and AMD.

Don't Miss: Salesforce Stock Rips on Earnings. Here's the Trade

But the stock certainly enjoyed an afternoon rally on Thursday when Loeb's position was reported..

AMD stock promptly rallied almost 5% from before the news broke into the close. Of course, it helped that the S&P 500 also enjoyed a nice rally into yesterday's close.

As we look at AMD stock now, the stock is up 1% on the day. Could a larger breakout be brewing?

Trading AMD Stock

Daily chart of Advanced Micro Devices stock.

Chart courtesy of TrendSpider.com

Above is the daily chart, which I want to use to highlight some of the smaller levels before turning our attention to the weekly chart below.

Notice on the daily chart how AMD has given up almost all its post-earnings gains, yet found support in the $76.50 to $78 area, which was pre-earnings resistance?

Don't Miss: Will Snowflake Stock Keep Melting? Here's Where Key Support Is

That type of action is constructive, as it gives buyers clarity on the company's recent quarter, yet provides a dip to buy on a better risk/reward proposition.


Weekly chart of Advanced Micro Devices stock.

Chart courtesy of TrendSpider.com

When we zoom out to the weekly chart, the setup becomes clearer. AMD stock is putting in an inside week after a very controlled pullback down to the aforementioned $76.50 to $78 area.

In this zone, we also find the 10-week and 200-week moving averages. How convenient.

Bulls would love to see AMD stock rotate over this week's high (near $81) and make a run toward $84. If the stock makes a run back toward the recent high, $89 is in play.

Above that could trigger a much larger breakout back toward $100.

On the downside, be cognizant of the gap-fill level and 50-day moving average near $75. A break of these measures — in addition to all of those mentioned above — would create an inside-weekly-down rotation and suggests that traders use caution in the short term. 

Enclosures

31883ceab34ff9b8b0df0ded5f14a399




Enviado do meu Galaxy

Want to know more?

Must have books!!!