April 23, 2023


Sneaker Brand Taps 80s Celebrity to Take On Nike
por Sarah Jean Callahan

The Street: Stock Market / 2023-04-23 19:32

Sneaker brand takes a page out of Nike's marketing campaign with its latest collaboration.

Sneaker brands have been in the news more than normal recently.

Adidas  (ADDYY)  was in the middle of a huge shoe deal with musician Kanye West, or 'Ye.' when the celebrity made anti-Semitic comments that left Adidas in a pickle. Adidas chose to pull out of the deal because it was the "right" decision. It chose to not proceed with the deal after the rapper's unsavory comments.

More negative news hit as Olympia Sports and Shoe City filed for bankruptcy after financial difficulties. Shoe City had been in the red for a couple years, before the company realized the best option was to close its doors. Olympia Sports met the same demise as Shoe City, both filing for bankruptcy leaving shoe brands like Nike, Adidas, Skechers  (SKX) - Get Free Report and other shoe brands as creditors left holding the bill.

Nike  (NKE) - Get Free Report came onto the stage with Amazon's new movie about Michael Jordan and the shoe deal featuring the basketball G.O.A.T as a rookie in "Air: Courting a Legend." The movie follows the story of Nike doing something unheard of at the time, developing a shoe completely around a rookie. This move was risky, but lucky for Nike, the rookie was Michael Jordan, and the rest is, well, history.

Skechers Brings In Mr. T
Skechers is taking a page out of Nike and Adidas marketing campaign books, but in a very different way than its competitors. Nike risked a lot doing a deal with an unknown rookie. Now Nike is featuring lots of rookies and getting deals signed with lesser known young talent hoping for the next big thing, like LeBron James and Kevin Durant, who each got major deals with Nike that worked out for both parties.

Skechers latest marketing campaign is all about nos'T'algia and is using its name which is has the 'T' sound in the brand name, but the 'T' is left out. So, bringing the 'T' to Skechers is none other than Mr. T, known to many as B.A. Baracus from the 1980's NBC-TV show "The A-Team." Mr. T is well known for his distinct look with a mohawk hairstyle, layers of gold chains, gold rings and tank top to show off his muscles. He looks like no one in their right mind would mess with him.

In the Skechers commercial, Mr. T is sporting different Skechers shoes while he participates in several different activities like playing pickleball, karate, arm wrestling and grilling out. 

"The people have spoken and it's about time there was a 't' in Skechers," according to Mr. T. He continued with his famous catchphrase, "I pity the fool who doesn't see how easy I find my way into every comfortable pair!" 

"The letter 't' has never been part of our name but sometimes computers and voice-to-text apps autocorrect it the wrong way," said Skechers President, Michael Greenberg. He continued, "Not that we are considering changing the spelling of our name, but it would have been foolish to say no to Mr. T – the only 't' that belongs in Skechers."

Shoe Brand Marketing Genius
Skechers has partnered with other celebrities like Snoop Dogg and other sports stars like Tony Romo and Cris Carter. Skechers branches out with its latest commercial showing Mr. T, who is a 1980's celebrity and will appeal to a totally different generation of shoppers, instead of those who just want the latest sports stars sneaker to play sports in, Gen X. 

While some older millennials may remember Mr. T, it is more likely that Gen-X will smile and appreciate the 80's muscle man icon and know his iconic catch phrase. Showing that Skechers shoes are great for more than just basketball, but other sports and just hanging out as Mr. T is just chilling by his van, is also reminiscent of the A -Team van.  

Whether Gen-X will choose to buy the Skechers brand over any other may not come down to whether or not Mr. T makes them or inspires them to, but probably more about comfort for this target audience at this point. The shoe commercial bringing back Mr. T is certainly amusing enough on its own. 





Enviado do meu Galaxy

human-like




Enviado do meu Galaxy

Bed Bath & Beyond Throws in the Towel
Yahoo! Finance: Top Stories / 2023-04-23 21:01



Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY), the beleaguered home goods retailer, has filed for bankruptcy after months of sounding the alarm and taking increasingly desperate measures to come up with enough cash just to stay afloat.

Bed Bath & Beyond filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Sunday, ending its months-long effort to remain liquid.
The company has begun a liquidation sale but will use bankruptcy proceedings to explore selling its assets.
Attempts to raise capital through convertible share sales, equity offerings, and reverse stock splits failed.
The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in New Jersey on Sunday, beginning the process of winding down its business. The company has secured $240 million in debtor-in-possession financing with which it plans to finance operations at its nearly 500 stores during the bankruptcy proceedings.

"We deeply appreciate our associates, customers, partners, and the communities we serve, and we remain steadfastly determined to serve them throughout this process," said CEO Sue Gove in an announcement of the filing. "We will continue working diligently to maximize value for the benefit of all stakeholders."

Bed Bath & Beyond, once a thriving home goods retailer, struggled to adapt to a changing retail landscape dominated by e-commerce and everything stores like Amazon (AMZN). The company's woes were exacerbated by the pandemic when physical stores became money pits and supply chain snarls wreaked havoc on inventory management.

The company has been sending up flares for months. The company first warned about bankruptcy in January, when it said widening quarterly losses and negative cash flow called into question its "ability to continue as a going concern."

Bed Bath & Beyond missed a $25 million interest payment in February, sinking its shares almost 50%. The company was able to pay within the one-month grace period, avoiding being forced to immediately pay its entire $1 billion debt.

That same month the company tried to sell up to $1 billion worth of convertible shares and warrants in a last-ditch effort to shore up its finances. But the sale was scrapped late last month after grossing just a fraction of the goal.

Instead, Bed Bath & Beyond initiated an "at-the-market" offering of up to $300 million of stock. But by mid-March, the company's share price had dipped below $1 for the first time since 1992, the year of its IPO.

The company was scheduled to hold a special meeting for shareholders in May to approve a reverse stock split.
Enclosures

9fcd467babc7fa1c8d8b60c6a0d54a0c




Enviado do meu Galaxy

April 13, 2023

Jeremy Siegel says he's 'shocked' at what the Fed's overlooked and sees stocks struggling over the next 6 months
Yahoo! Finance: Top Stories / 2023-04-13 20:3251



Jeremy Siegel, professor of finance at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.Scott Mlyn/CNBC/NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty Images
Wharton economist Jeremy Siegel says he's shocked the Fed has overlooked the drop in bank lending.

Banking chaos and tighter credit could spur a big fall in US economic activity, he told CNBC.

He expects stocks to struggle in the next 6 months – and lifted odds of a recession this year.

Wharton professor Jeremy Siegel says he's amazed the Federal Reserve has overlooked tighter lending standards,  while warning US stocks could struggle over the next six months.

"What happened to the banking system, and what I see in data on lending falling off the cliff, really portends a much bigger decline in economic activity," the veteran economist said in a CNBC interview Wednesday.

"I am shocked that no one at the Fed has cited the reduction in lending that has occurred — almost the most in 75 years, actually," Siegel added.

Americans are already feeling the pinch of tighter credit conditions after the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, as banks become more cautious about how much they lend and who they lend to. That's sparked worries that a full-blown credit crunch is coming for the US.

Some think it could also spell tough times for the economy, given the higher cost of borrowing, the lower access to credit and the chances of a bump in unemployment.

Siegel is pessimistic about US stocks and the economy because the Fed is set on continuing to jack up interest rates despite the turmoil in the banking industry.

"I believe the Fed has already done too much. ... Their trajectory was way too high," he said.

According to Siegel, any more rate hikes by the Fed could spell pain for US stocks over the next six months and raises the probability of a US recession this year.

"Even though it might be rough over the next three to six months, unless you're very tactical and very short-term, I'm not a seller," he said, adding that he's still a "very bullish" long-term investor.

The US central bank has lifted benchmark interest rates from almost zero to upwards of 4.75% over the past 12 months — the steepest jump in US borrowing costs since the 1980s. It's trying to quell persistently high inflation, which hit a 40-year high of 9.1% last summer and remained above the Fed's 2% target at 5% year-over-year in March.

Traders expect the Fed to bring in another 25 basis-point rate hike at its May meeting, fed funds futures show. They also expect its policymakers to begin cutting interest rates in July.

But Siegel thinks the Fed will cut rates this year lower than those futures signal, once policymakers have seen a slowdown in inflation and economic activity.

Read the original article on Business Insider

Enclosures

018b2f5ef91b08861da48862410b80b7




Enviado do meu Galaxy

Jeff Bezos, George Soros, Mark Cuban, and Ray Dalio All Have One Thing in Common: They're Making a Big Bet on This Industry
Yahoo! Finance: Top Stories / 2023-04-13 20:3251

When billionaires jump on the same trend, it's important for investors to take notice. The pieces often don't come together immediately, but these investors have millions of dollars in resources dedicated to getting the most up-to-date information as quickly as possible. They might see trends months in advance that others might not notice until it's too late.

Don't Miss: The House-Printing Robot Shaking Up a $7.28 Trillion Industry

Hedge fund manager George Soros is a polarizing figure, but you'd be foolish not to take notice of some of his investing trends. The Soros Fund Management Holdings 13F was recently released, and a new company tops the list as its biggest holding. Soros recently purchased $325 million worth of Horizon Therapeutics PLC (NASDAQ: HZNP), which now makes up 5.54% of his portfolio, despite previously owning none of it.

Horizon is a biotechnology company developing cures for rare and rheumatic diseases. In a vacuum, this may or may not be significant. But a number of other notable billionaires also are making similar headway into the healthcare industry.

To stay updated with top startup news & investments, sign up for Benzinga's Startup Investing & Equity Crowdfunding Newsletter

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, the largest hedge fund in the world, is making similar bets. Two of its largest holdings are in Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE: PG) and Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ). Collectively, they make up 7.57% of the entire hedge fund's portfolio. In a recent interview, Dalio noted that biotech is one of the current investment areas he finds interesting.

Jeff Bezos's Amazon.com Inc. also is quickly becoming a healthcare powerhouse. Amazon officially closed its $3.9 billion acquisition of One Medical earlier this week. Earlier this year, Amazon rolled out a low-cost subscription service for generic medications to Prime members. This comes after the full rollout of Amazon Pharmacy, other ventures around telehealth and significant investments in the space.

In competition with Amazon, entrepreneur and TV personality Mark Cuban rolled out his Mark Cuban's Cost Plus Drugs Co. in 2021. This has been one of his biggest focal points of the past two years and likely what the billionaire wants to be his legacy. Cuban's startup being an example of the potential upside in startup investing and private markets.

This means at least four prominent billionaires are using some of the biggest companies in the world to invest in healthcare. Following in the footsteps of these magnates in these holdings are a pretty easy and straightforward option. Mark Cuban's Cost Plus Drugs Co. is a private startup, so investors are out of luck. But investors do have options if they're looking to invest in healthcare startup in general. For example, Aura Health is the world's leading marketplace for mentel wellness and used by more than 7 million people worldwide. For a limited time, anyone can invest in Aura Health.

See more on startup investing from Benzinga.

Don't miss real-time alerts on your stocks - join Benzinga Pro for free! Try the tool that will help you invest smarter, faster, and better.

This article Jeff Bezos, George Soros, Mark Cuban, and Ray Dalio All Have One Thing in Common: They're Making a Big Bet on This Industry originally appeared on Benzinga.com

.

© 2023 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.





Enviado do meu Galaxy

USD/CAD falls to a two-month low. What's next
por Adam Button

Forexlive RSS Breaking news feed / 2023-04-13 21:01

The Canadian dollar is back.

A month ago, the thinking was that the Federal Reserve would continue to hike to levels well-beyond the Bank of Canada's 4.50% overnight rate and that was followed by a crumbling of global growth sentiment on a bank run and oil falling to the lowest levels in a year.

Since the bank run has stabilized but the market is increasingly confident that the Fed is nearly done hiking and OPEC swooped in to reverse the losses in oil.

That's prompted a sharp turnaround in USD/CAD from 1.3862 on March 9 to 1.3338 currently -- a two-month low.

Can USD/CAD continue to fall?

Technically, the pair will soon run into a series of previous lows stretching from 1.3218 to 1.3273. If those don't break, it would reinforce a pattern of higher lows that's been ongoing for nearly two years. If that cracks, it would highlight and confirm a double top below 1.40 with a measured target of 1.26.

To get there, I would need to grow more confident in the outlook for global growth and energy. That could come from a further rise in crude prices due to OPEC cuts but that would need to be matched on strengthening global demand, particularly from China.

On the domestic side, the Canadian housing market is at an inflection point as the spring real estate market ramps up. So far, pricing is holding up ok but I don't have confidence that demand will last. Every day homeowners are hit with rate resetting higher on 5-year mortgages and that could put more homes on the market.

So for now, I'm cautious on further declines in USD/CAD. There's good support nearby so the risk-reward doesn't argue for selling now but I'm open to the idea of selling on a break of 1.3200.

This article was written by Adam Button at www.forexlive.com.




Enviado do meu Galaxy

April 10, 2023

Norway counts the cost of its new wealth tax as billionaires flee to Switzerland
Yahoo! Finance: Top Stories / 2023-04-10 21:111



Norway - Natnan Srisuwan/Moment RF
"A difficult choice has been made. I've moved from Asker, Norway, to Lugano in Switzerland," Norway's biggest taxpayer, and the largest shareholder of investment firm Aker ASA, Kjell Inge Røkke wrote to the rest of the board in an open letter last September.

Mr Røkke, an industrial tycoon with an estimated net worth of Nkr 19.6bn (£1.5bn), is among 50 billionaires and millionaires to have left Norway over the past year as they were hit with higher rates of wealth tax.

Record numbers of the country's richest residents have fled since the Labour-centre coalition increased wealth tax rates by 0.1 percentage points, costing the government tens of millions in lost tax revenue. The 50 high earners, with a combined net worth of more than Nkr 40bn (£3bn), make up more than the total number who have left the country for Switzerland since 2009, according to Norwegian newspaper Dagens Naeringsliv.

It is expected that even more wealthy Norwegians will leave because of the tax raid which kicked in last November.

The exodus from Norway, which is one of just four in the OECD to still impose a wealth tax, may be noticed by the Treasury as Labour discusses ways to make the rich pay more tax in the UK. Sir Keir Starmer is believed to be considering various forms of wealth taxation – including a capital gains tax raid and a removal of various tax-free exemptions for the rich, should Labour win the next election.

Norway's wealth tax has long been a thorn in the side of the country's super-rich. It is one of only a handful of OECD countries to impose a wealth tax on the global net worth of its citizens – defined as total assets minus total debt.

In 1990, 12 OECD countries, all in Europe, levied wealth taxes. However, most of them repealed these in the 1990s and 2000s due to growing fears that in a globalised world the wealthy would simply take their riches elsewhere. France was the last to scrap its wealth tax in 2017, after losing an estimated 60,000 millionaires between 2000 and 2016, according to research by intelligence firm New World Wealth.

Now the only European countries to levy a wealth tax are Norway, Spain and Switzerland.

This is despite the fact that wealth taxes raise surprisingly little for the government. Only a tiny proportion of Norway's tax take – about 1pc, according to the OECD – comes from wealth taxes. Dan Neidle of Tax Policy Associates, a non-profit, said: "Norway is probably the developed country with the most significant wealth tax, but it's still not very significant."

This is in part due to discounts that apply to primary residence and unlisted shares.

Mr Neidle said these rules have some "weirdly distortive effects" on behaviour. "That creates an incentive to avoid listing your business, and put as much of your net worth into your house as possible. These are not great outcomes from a policy perspective."

Under Norway's tax policy, an individual with worldwide net wealth above Nkr 1.7m (£130,000) is taxed at 1pc on everything above this threshold. Of this tax take, 0.3pc goes to the state and the remaining 0.7pc goes to the person's municipality. Those with over Nkr 20m (£1.5m) pay a rate of 1.1pc. This extra 0.1pc goes to the state.

Mr Røkke did not give any financial reasons for the move, adding that although Lugano is "neither the cheapest nor has the lowest taxes" it is "a great place with a central location in Europe".

Other wealthy individuals who have recently abandoned Norway include Tore Ivar Slettemoen, co-founder of battery company Feyr, and Ninja Tollefsen, daughter of property investor Ivar Tollefsen. Fredrik Haga, 31-year-old co-founder of cryptocurrency data business Dune, has also gone to Switzerland. Mr Haga, who has most of his wealth tied up in the rapidly growing company, told the Financial Times that he was worried his next tax bill would be several times his disposable income.

It may seem strange that so many Norwegians are moving to Switzerland, a country that has a wealth tax of its own. In fact, Switzerland makes even more from wealth taxes than Norway does – making up about 4pc of the total tax take. However, the country offers deals for foreigners that place it high on the list of wealthy individuals in search of a new home.

In certain Swiss cantons, a person who is living but not working in Switzerland can opt for a favourable lump-sum tax based on their expenditures and standard of living rather than their worldwide income and assets.

In a desperate attempt to stop high taxpayers leaving the country, Norway has said it is investigating the possibility of an "exit tax" where individuals are taxed on saved capital income the moment they move out of the country.

Its government has already taken a major step to stop its wealthiest individuals flowing out of the country when, last November, it repealed "the five-year rule" that meant wealthy Norwegians could sell their shares without paying tax on the gain if they had lived abroad for more than five years.

Norway has been led by a Labour-Centre coalition government since the parties won by a landslide in September 2021 bringing to an end eight years under its Conservative Party led by Erna Solberg.

The centre-left government's state budget last autumn, which raised wealth taxes, was welcomed by many in the left-leaning party. Jonas Gahr Støre, the prime minister, told his Labour Party members at their national meeting in September: "Shifting power in society never happens without friction and some noise. A more fair tax system challenges those with means who don't want to contribute more to society. We have to be prepared for that."

The OECD has warned that wealth taxes have a negative impact on long-term growth, damaging entrepreneurship and risk-taking.

In Scotland there are mounting concerns that a 1 percentage point rise in the two top rates of income tax will lead to a "brain drain" across the border. This month, the higher rate of tax in Scotland has increased from 41pc to 42pc, while the additional rate has gone up from 46pc to 47pc. By comparison, the additional rate in England is 45pc.

Labour members have openly called on Sir Keir to impose some form of wealth tax. The Labour leader has denied he is planning to introduce such a policy, but he is nonetheless planning to target forms of wealth.

Sir Keir wants to remove private schools' charitable status, meaning they lose their VAT exemption – a move that would cost families thousands of pounds a year in private school fees. According to investment firm Waverton, a family currently paying £31,310 a year to put two children through private school would see their bills go up by £6,262 annually if the VAT exemption was cut.

The party has also promised to remove the "non-dom status" which allows UK residents who live abroad not to pay UK tax on overseas income. It is thought Labour would significantly shorten the window down from 15 years, the current timeframe before the status expires. Tax experts have warned that slashing the status could drive the economic elite out of the country.

It is understood that Labour also wants to raise tax for second homeowners, by blocking them from a planned freeze on council tax and increasing capital gains tax rates in line with income tax rates.

Of the proposed wealth taxes in the UK, Mr Neidle said: "We don't really know what the impact of these taxes would be. But if existing wealth taxes damage growth, then the proposals for more ambitious wealth taxes would presumably be more damaging."

Enclosures

59eaf301e6335fd2c771887b94a3f6bb




Enviado do meu Galaxy

Key Words: Hedge-fund billionaire Paul Singer still sees dangerous 'bubble securities, bubble asset classes' in markets
MarketWatch.com - Top Stories / 2023-04-10 22:21



""Credit collapse, although terrible, is not as terrible as hyperinflation in terms of destruction wrought upon societies.""

— Paul Singer, hedge-fund manager and founder of Elliott Management
That's hedge-fund billionaire Paul Singer of Elliott Management, on why he thinks a deep recession and credit collapse will be necessary to purge financial markets of excesses created by more than a decade of easy-money policies.

"I think that this is an extraordinarily dangerous and confusing period," Singer told The Wall Street Journal, in a recent interview, warning that trouble in markets may only be getting started a year into the Federal Reserve's rate hikes.

"Credit collapse, although terrible, is not as terrible as hyperinflation in terms of destruction wrought upon societies," he said. "Capitalism, which is economic freedom, can survive a credit crisis. We don't think it can survive hyperinflation."

Singer, called a "doomsday investor" by the New Yorker, including for his epic battle with Argentina over its defaulted debt, in't a fan of sweeping banking regulations from the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, or prolonged market interventions by global central banks in the wake of the 2008 global financial crisis, or cryptocurrencies.

He called crypto, "completely lacking in any value," in his WSJ interview. He also said: "There are thousands of cryptocurrencies. That's why they're worth zero. Anybody can make one. All they are is nothing with a marketing pitch—literally nothing."

Bitcoin BTCUSD, +3.44% was edging closer to the $30,000 mark on Monday, but still off its roughly $67,000 record price in November 2021, according to CoinDesk.

Singer worries the Fed and other central banks will respond to the next downturn by picking up their recent playbook of slashing interest rates, and potentially resuming large-scale asset purchases.

To bolster his point, Singer called the regulatory response to the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, including the guaranteeing of all deposits from the two lenders akin to "wrapping all market movements in security blankets."

"I know these guys got fired, but all concepts of risk management are based around the possibilities of loss," he said. "Take it away, it's going to have consequences."

With that backdrop, Singer said there may be only a few places for investors to ride out the storm that he sees brewing.

"At such times, some consider the safest bet to be relatively short-term U.S. government debt," Singer said, adding that "such debt pays a decent return with virtually no chance of a negative outcome."

Singer also said having some gold GC00, -0.99% in portfolios may makes sense.

The 2-year Treasury rate TMUBMUSD02Y, 4.016% was around 4% on Monday, while the 10-year yield TMUBMUSD10Y, 3.422% was at 3.24%, according to FactSet. Stocks were trading between small gains and losses, with the S&P 500 index SPX, +0.10% about 0.1% higher, at last check.





Enviado do meu Galaxy

April 5, 2023


How to fix the International Monetary Fund | Leaders
The Economist Print edition / 2023-04-05 17:1151
EVER SINCE it was founded in 1944, the imf has had to get used to reinventing itself. Today, however, it faces an identity crisis like none before. The fund, whose annual spring jamboree kicks off on April 10th, is supposed to provide a financial safety-net for countries in distress. Yet, although the poor world is in the throes of the worst debt crisis in decades, the fund seems all but unable to lend. An extra $1trn has been committed to the IMF since the covid-19 pandemic began; however its loan book has grown by a paltry $51bn.

The fund is paralysed because it is a multilateral institution that aspires to represent the whole world, at the same time as being a club which is controlled by America and its Western allies. That worked when America was the world's dominant power and was intent on pursuing liberal internationalism. Now China is trying to build an alternative order and America is turning inward. Unless the fund acts soon, its ability to do its job as a crisis lender will be in question.

In its infancy the imf's main role was to promote balanced trade and manage the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates. It was only when those arrangements collapsed that it shifted its focus to another of its missions: providing emergency cash, with strings attached, to countries in crisis. From the 1980s, and especially during the Asian financial crisis in 1997, the fund became known for its unyielding application of economic orthodoxy. In the 2010s it revised some of its views on austerity and capital controls, and tried to promote its softer side.

Today the fund's role as a crisis lender is both shrunken and less successful. Many big emerging markets have amassed vast quantities of foreign-exchange reserves to guard against currency crises. Some 30% of the fund's outstanding lending has gone to just one borrower, Argentina. The imf lends to countries like Egypt and Pakistan, which are strategically important to America. But these have gained licence to put off reform indefinitely; the fund has been urging Pakistan to mend its sales tax since at least 1997. And the imf is no longer the only crisis lender in town. Gulf countries including Saudi Arabia now offer emergency cash, often using obscure methods, say by depositing money at the borrower's central bank.

The main problem is that China has become a big creditor to the poorest countries, whose needs are small but urgent. Rising interest rates and the pandemic have left at least 21 in default or seeking debt restructuring, and many more look fragile. Yet China is reluctant to participate in debt write-downs, in part because it objects to the imf not bearing its share of losses—a vital safeguard for a lender of last resort. The fund has not overseen a single write-down involving China since the crisis started.

Without them, countries' finances may not be sustainable even as creditors are bailed out. America worries about imf funds flowing into China's pockets. Although many loans have been approved, most are supposed to be conditional on restructuring that has not been agreed on—much of the cash intended for Suriname, for example, has been in limbo for more than a year. As the fund has floundered, China has boosted its own emergency lending.

Together these trends risk making the imf irrelevant—just like another global institution, the World Trade Organisation, which has also been sabotaged, this time by America. With debt talks frozen, the fund is conjuring up new goals, such as lending to help with climate change. That has caused a turf war with the World Bank, which is better suited to project finance.

The fund does not need a new mission. It needs the ability to get tough on rogue creditors. For some the solution is for it to align itself explicitly with the West, perhaps by implementing restructurings that ban countries from ever again borrowing from unco-operative official creditors. But even if such a policy were credible, it would be a mistake to freeze out China entirely. Not only would it be against the spirit of the fund's mission, but if countries are forced to make a once-and-for-all choice between financial spheres, some may well choose China's.

Instead the imf should make borrowers suspend payments on their debts to obstructive official creditors for as long as a fund programme is active. That would circumvent and punish lenders that block restructuring, while leaving open a path to their participation should they decide to behave constructively. The IMF would remain open and global. It would not push China away, but save a seat at the table should it choose to take one. Such a strategy would echo the fund's inclusive approach to several communist states in the cold war.

Though the imf should not close itself off, the sooner it can bypass today's blockages, the better. Helping countries in crisis is much harder and less glamorous than it used to be. But it is still essential. ■





Enviado do meu Galaxy


Bills, Notes, Or Bonds?
por Tyler Durden

Zero Hedge / 2023-04-05 17:30294
Bills, Notes, Or Bonds?
Authored by Michael Lebowitz via RealInvestmentAdvice.com,

260 Fed meetings will occur between the issuance and maturity of a 30-year Treasury bond. There will be 260 times when the Fed raises, lowers, or does nothing with Fed Funds. In that perspective, why should a bondholder care what the Fed does or doesn't do at the next few meetings? We ask the question because we get many questions from potential bond investors on whether they should buy bills, notes, or bonds based solely on expected Fed policy.

Many inquiries are concerned about buying bonds too soon because they fear the Fed may still raise rates once or twice. While the Fed is an important variable in the performance of all bills, notes, and bonds, its actions significantly impact shorter-term bills and have less influence on longer-term notes and bonds. 

To better appreciate what drives yields across the spectrum of Treasury securities, we share some evidence on what factors influence bill, note, and bond yields. This exercise will help better assess which maturity bond may best serve your needs while effectively reflecting your economic and Fed outlook.

For a refresher on bond basics, we recommend reading our article Treasury Bonds FAQ. Additionally, watch our YouTube appearance, Bonds Explained Simply, with Adam Taggart of Wealthion.

Bond Market Lingo
Before moving on, it's worth a quick review of what constitutes bills, notes, and bonds.

Bills encompass all securities issued with a maturity of one year or less. They are sold at a discount to par and do not pay a coupon. Bill investors instead receive the difference between the purchase price and par at maturity.

Notes and bonds pay coupons and are initially auctioned at or very close to par. Bonds include all maturities of more than ten years, while notes include anything between one year and ten years.

Short-Term Bills Are Bets on the Fed
The shorter the bond term, the greater its yield is influenced by the Federal Reserve. Therefore, the most significant factor is the Federal Reserve if you are considering anything between a one-month and six-month bill. Of course, what the Fed does or doesn't do depends on economic data and the financial markets.

The graph below shows that 3-month Treasury bill yields are nearly perfectly correlated with the average of Fed Funds and the market implied forward Fed Funds rate (rolling three months Fed Funds futures contract).


For short-term bill investors, the most critical factor in deciding which maturity bill to buy is your expectation of monetary policy in the coming meeting or two.

If you think future expectations for the Fed Funds rate are too high, you are best served to lock in the longer six-month yield. Conversely, if you think they are too low, buy a shorter three-month bill and another three-month one in three months. If you are correct, your combined return will exceed the six-month yield. 

The equation below closely approximates the market's future yield expectation. In the example, we solve for rate A (a 3-month yield, three months from now). We assume a 5.00% 3-month bill and a 5.20% 6-month bill:

(3 X 5%) + (3 X A%) = (6 X 5.2%)

15           + 3 X A      = 31.2

3 X A =  31.2-15 = 16.2

A = 16.2/3 = 5.40%

If the future 3-month bill yields 5.41% or more, you are better off buying the 3-month bill and buying a second one when it matures. If not, the six-month bill is the better decision.

Long-Term Notes and Bonds
Unlike bills, notes and bonds better reflect longer-term economic and inflation expectations.

Treasury investors, like all investors, strive to earn a positive real return. Such means they should buy assets that provide a positive return after subtracting inflation. They want to increase, not decrease, their purchasing power.

Given what longer-term bond investors seek, they tend to focus more on the economy and inflation and less on what the Fed will do at the next one or two meetings. That said, Fed Funds are still a significant factor, as shown below. The graph below plots ten-year notes versus Fed Funds.



The R-squared (.75) is statically high but far from the near-perfect correlation we showed with 3-month bills. While the relationship is strong, there is a wide variance in the instances versus the trend line. If you recall, there was minimal variance in the 3-month bill vs. Fed Funds plot.

The following two plots show that ten-year yields have near equally strong relationships with three-year GDP and inflation trends. 



Yield Curves
The graph below compares the 3-month T-bill and 10-year note yields and their moving averages.



While both securities trend in the same direction, the change in the yield difference over time is volatile. To highlight better, we show below the 3-month bill/ 10-year note yield curve. The curve is the difference between the two yields.



We hope this is your aha moment. When buying a bill, note, or bond, the bet is on the Fed. But note and bond investors, unlike bill investors, also care about future economic trends. The sharp gyrations in the graph above make that abundantly clear. It also those gyrations that dictate relative returns for bills, notes, and bondholders.

Current Situation
The yield curve is currently inverted by 1.47%. Ten-year investors are willing to sacrifice one and a half percent versus what they could earn in a three-month bill. They make such an investment because, in time, they believe economic growth and inflation will be slower than they are today. As such, they are comfortable locking in 3.35% for ten years and passing on the opportunity to buy bills and make more for the next few months but possibly a lot less for the next nine years.

Further, if long-term bond investors are correct, the price of notes and bonds will appreciate much more than shorter-term notes and bills. If the two-year and ten-year note rates decline by 2%, the two-year note investor could see their price rise by about 3.75%. Ten-year investors should expect a 17% gain. For more on bond math and the potential gains of losses associated with yield changes, please read our article, Treasury Bond FAQ.

Summary- The Case for Long Bonds
We think the economy and inflation will revert to pre-pandemic trends. Such means GDP and CPI will be at or below 2%. As a result, Treasury note and bond yields will likely fall to similar levels. We like locking yields well above those rates for ten or more years. If correct, we may monetize the yield decline and re-invest the funds in riskier bonds, stocks, or another asset class offering higher returns when the time is right. The timing of such a trade may not be perfect. Still, in a disinflationary and slow economic growth environment, the long-term benefits of owning notes or bonds versus bills outweigh short-term price volatility and the opportunity cost of higher bill yields for another quarter or two.

Today, the Fed risks aggravating the banking crisis and a recession because they may have already raised rates too far. It is quite possible that even if the Fed hikes rates more, notes and bonds may fall in yield. Bond investors are looking ahead and realizing the higher the Fed goes, the more crippling the effects on the economy and inflation.

Tyler Durden Wed, 04/05/2023 - 10:20




Enviado do meu Galaxy

April 3, 2023

New Ceramic Battery Could Replace Lithium-Ion Batteries
por Brian Westenhaus

Oilprice.com / 2023-04-03 20:0460


Researchers at Vienna University of Technology have developed an oxygen-ion battery based on ceramic materials that has a longer lifespan than lithium-ion batteries.
The new battery can be regenerated and does not require rare elements, making it an ideal solution for large energy storage systems.
While the battery's energy density is lower than that of lithium-ion batteries, its strengths lie in its long service life and incombustible properties.
Scientists at Vienna University of Technology have invented a new oxygen ion battery chemistry based on ceramic materials. If it degrades, it can be regenerated, therefore it potentially has an extremely long lifespan. Also, it does not require any rare elements and it is incombustible. For large energy storage systems, this could be an optimal solution.

Power and energy density comparison chart of modern battery chemistries and a fuel cell with a plot of the new oxygen ion chemistry. 

Lithium-ion batteries are common today – from electric cars to smartphones. But that does not mean that they are the best solution for all areas of application. TU Wien has now succeeded in developing an oxygen-ion battery that has some important advantages. Although it does not allow for as high of energy densities as the lithium-ion battery, its storage capacity does not decrease irrevocably over time: it can be regenerated and thus may enable an extremely long service life.

In addition, oxygen-ion batteries can be produced without rare elements and are made of incombustible materials. A patent application for the new battery idea has already been filed together with cooperation partners from Spain. The oxygen-ion battery could be an excellent solution for large energy storage systems, for example to store electrical energy from renewable sources.

The paper describing the research 'Rechargeable Oxide Ion Batteries Based on Mixed Conducting Oxide Electrodes.' has been published in the journal Advanced Energy Materials.

Ceramic materials as a new solution

Alexander Schmid from the Institute for Chemical Technologies and Analytics at TU Wien noted, "We have had a lot of experience with ceramic materials that can be used for fuel cells for quite some time. That gave us the idea of investigating whether such materials might also be suitable for making a battery."

The ceramic materials that the TU Wien team studied can absorb and release doubly negatively charged oxygen ions. When an electric voltage is applied, the oxygen ions migrate from one ceramic material to another, after which they can be made to migrate back again, thus generating electric current.

Professor Jürgen Fleig explained, "The basic principle is actually very similar to the lithium-ion battery. But our materials have some important advantages."

Ceramics are not flammable – so fire accidents, which occur time and again with lithium-ion batteries, are practically ruled out. In addition, there is no need for rare elements, which are expensive or can only be extracted in an environmentally harmful way.

Tobias Huber expanded the explanation with, "In this respect, the use of ceramic materials is a great advantage because they can be adapted very well. You can replace certain elements that are difficult to obtain with others relatively easily."

The prototype of the battery still uses lanthanum – an element that is not exactly rare but not completely common either. But even lanthanum is to be replaced by something cheaper, and research into this is already underway. Cobalt or nickel, which are used in many batteries, are not used at all.

High life span

 But perhaps the most important advantage of the new battery technology is its potential longevity.

"In many batteries, you have the problem that at some point the charge carriers can no longer move," said Alexander Schmid. "Then they can no longer be used to generate electricity, the capacity of the battery decreases. After many charging cycles, that can become a serious problem."

The oxygen-ion battery, however, can be regenerated without any problems: If oxygen is lost due to side reactions, then the loss can simply be compensated for by oxygen from the ambient air.

The new battery concept is not intended for smartphones or electric cars, because the oxygen-ion battery only achieves about a third of the energy density that one is used to from lithium-ion batteries and runs at temperatures between 200 and 400° C. The technology is, however, extremely interesting for storing energy.

Alexander Schmid makes the case this way, "If you need a large energy storage unit to temporarily store solar or wind energy, for example, the oxygen-ion battery could be an excellent solution. If you construct an entire building full of energy storage modules, the lower energy density and increased operating temperature do not play a decisive role. But the strengths of our battery would be particularly important there: the long service life, the possibility of producing large quantities of these materials without rare elements, and the fact that there is no fire hazard with these batteries."

***

This battery technology does have a serious level of promise. Even at only a third of lithium ion capacity the longevity has to have a very large impact. A daily cycled lithium ion battery should perform well into the third year, but how would that compete with a battery that might last 20 years or more? Would the lithium ion solution of the same capacity cost 80% less?

The metric of concern is the cost to make the ceramic and package it. Building a service center of these batteries might be lower cost or not, but a comparison to lithium ion needs to come.

The problem is going to be the costs to heat the battery sets and keep them at 200 to 400° C. That's a bit under the ignition temp of paper up past the temperature of dry steam.

But nothing mentioned exceeds or even really heavily challenges conventional engineering. So. Lets hope getting a prototype up and running happens soon to find the unforeseen matters that need exposed.

By Brian Westenhaus via New Energy and Fuel 

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:






Enviado do meu Galaxy

April 1, 2023

Stock Market Sell-Off: Where to Invest $500 Right Now
por newsfeedback@fool.com (Jon Quast)

The Motley Fool / 2023-04-01 14:179


I don't know how much $500 is to you personally, but I do know it's a lot of money to many people.

According to research by The Motley Fool, the median annual family income in the U.S. was almost $70,000 in 2021, which works out to about $5,800 per month. Let's say the median family saved 10% of monthly income for investing in stocks -- a percentage worthy of applause. For such a money-smart family, $500 would almost be an entire monthly investment.

With this in mind, I'm treating a $500 investment as one whole position in a diversified portfolio -- if you invest the Motley Fool way, you'll be looking to build a portfolio of at least 25 companies. And buying stocks during a pullback like right now (the S&P 500 is down 17% from its all-time high) is a great time to do it.

However, rather than shortchange you with just one idea for your portfolio today, I'll be giving you three different ideas: equipment-rental company United Rentals (URI 2.48%), furniture company Lovesac (LOVE 4.75%), and online education platform Udemy (UDMY 3.28%). And each idea could serve a different purpose in a portfolio.

1. United Rentals: The safe dividend-growth opportunity
If I were starting out today, I would want to begin by laying a strong foundation for my portfolio. And United Rentals is the kind of company that can be foundational, in my opinion.

It has a long history of market-beating returns. And it just started paying a dividend, leaving plenty of room to grow it in the future.

According to management, United Rentals finished 2022 with 17% market share in the equipment-rental space in North America with nearly 1,500 locations. It has over 1 million equipment units (backhoes, water pumps, scissor lifts, and more), which are valued at nearly $20 billion. That scale is hard to replicate and gives it a competitive advantage.

As long as people need equipment to do jobs, United Rentals has a reliable business. Moreover, it has a very profitable business: It has generated positive free cash flow in 17 of the past 20 years. And management expects more than $2 billion in free cash flow in 2023, which should be around a 15% margin.

Management has options for its cash flow, including acquiring other companies and repurchasing shares; it frequently does both. But it also just started using some of its cash to pay a quarterly dividend of $1.48 per share. For perspective, that's only about 20% of its earnings, leaving plenty of room to increase the dividend in the future.

And if United Rentals isn't up your alley, don't worry: There are other safe, dividend-growth opportunities out there for laying a strong foundation in your portfolio.

2. Lovesac: The profitable growth company
United Rentals' revenue is up around 66% over the past five years. But that doesn't hold a candle to Lovesac's revenue growth of more than 400% during this time. The company's high-quality beanbag chairs and sectional couches are increasingly in demand.

And high margins allow it to turn a profit while it grows. This is a great kind of company to add to a portfolio as you build beyond your foundational stocks.

On the surface, one would think that Lovesac is just another furniture company. But it has some important distinctions. Nearly 90% of sales come from its sectional couches, called Sactionals. And this has many advantages for the business.

For starters, Lovesac is constantly updating its Sactionals. In 2021, it released its StealthTech technology, which provides immersive sound and wireless charging for phones. In a brilliant move, management makes all new Sactional add-on products backward compatible so existing customers can spend more over time. In this way, Lovesac can extract more lifetime value from its customers than many of its peers can.

Moreover, it has advantages because all Sactional sections are uniform in size. Showrooms need little space to demonstrate how to configure them in multiple ways. Inventory stacks nicely in the back. And e-commerce orders -- about one-quarter of sales -- ship easier than typical bulky furniture. This helps Lovesac showrooms have a payback period of under one year, which is very important for retail companies with physical stores.

Lovesac's unit economics support its profitability. It earned $28 million in net income in its recently completed fiscal 2023 and expects $30 million to $36 million in its fiscal 2024.

And the company still has great revenue growth prospects. It has 195 showrooms right now but plans to more than double its store count over the next five years. Assuming the popularity of its products continues, this profitable growth stock could outperform the average for the S&P 500.

3. Udemy: The speculative stock with a high upside
According to third-party research group Arizton, the market size for e-learning is around $214 billion worldwide. But this is expected to surpass $475 billion by 2027. And it's clear that much of this spending will come from businesses looking to increase their workers' skills. HR media platform People Matters estimates that corporate e-learning could be a $370 billion market. 

So Udemy has an enormous runway for growth, considering that annual recurring revenue (ARR) for its enterprise segment was only $372 million at the end of 2022.

Udemy's education content is generated by users, not the company. It is merely the distribution platform connecting educators with anyone who wants to learn. User-generated content businesses typically have good margins. And indeed, Udemy's gross margin is 56%.

Udemy is not profitable; it had a net loss of $154 million in 2022. But there's a simple reason to hope the company quickly turns this around. Its enterprise segment has a more robust gross margin of almost 67%. And this part of the business is growing faster than the business as a whole.

As a whole, revenue was only up 22% year over year in 2022. But ARR for its enterprise segment was up 57%. Projecting this rapid growth forward, Udemy's gross margin should creep higher, potentially improving its bottom line substantially, which could make this a winning investment.

On the flip side, Udemy might never turn the corner on profits. And if it doesn't, chances are slim that it will enrich shareholders. That's why Udemy (and other promising tech stocks that are still unprofitable) might be best to buy only after you've built your portfolio around 25 or more companies that have higher chances of positive returns, like United Rentals and Lovesac.

However, considering it trades at less than two times trailing sales, I'd say now is an opportune time to take a chance on Udemy. There are risks with this stock, but at least the valuation risk is minimal here.

Personally, my retirement portfolio is already quite large with over 30 stocks. And that's why of these three companies, Udemy is the one I'd consider buying today. But I believe all three could be good investments from here.

Jon Quast has positions in United Rentals. The Motley Fool recommends Lovesac. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Deep Dive: This stock ETF keeps beating the S&P 500 by selecting for quality
MarketWatch.com - Top Stories / 2023-04-01 15:37



There are many approaches to building stock portfolios for the long term, but all of them require patience. And chasing last year's best performers can hurt your long-term results, as Mark Hulbert explained.

And even if you are patient, a long-term active strategy may underperform broad indexes and the exchange-funds that track them. One reason for underperformance might be that the actively managed funds have higher expenses. Another reason is that the S&P 500 SPX, +1.44% has been so top-heavy, with the largest technology players dominating its performance during the bull market through 2021.

Even now, following an 18% decline in 2021, and a 4% return in 2023, the top five companies held by the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust SPY, +1.41%, which tracks the benchmark index, make up 21.3% of the portfolio. These are Apple Inc. AAPL, +1.56%, Microsoft Corp. MSFT, +1.50%, Amazon.com Inc. AMZN, +1.26%, Nvidia Corp. NVDA, +1.44% and Alphabet Inc. GOOG, +2.65% GOOGL, +2.81%. (All returns in this article include reinvested dividends.)

The last four companies listed above are also held by the $7.2 billion Van Eck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF MOAT, +1.60%, but this fund uses a modified equal-weighted strategy as it is reconstituted and rebalanced every quarter. The fund was established in 2012. It tracks Morningstar's Wide Moat Focus Index.

Here are MOAT's returns through March 28, compared with those of SPY, over various periods:

ETF Ticker 2023 1 year Three-year average Five-year average 10-year average
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF MOAT, +1.60% 9.1% -4.4% 19.8% 13.1% 13.2%
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust SPY, +1.41% 3.8% -11.7% 17.8% 10.7% 11.8%
Source: FactSet
Here's a 10-year chart of the ETFs' total returns:


FactSet
During an interview, Brandon Rakszawski, director of product management at VanEck, said the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index reflects that firm's own research, with its analysts assigning "economic moat" ratings to companies they believe have special, long-term competitive advantages. Going further, he described the eligible universe that MOAT might invest in as a group of only about 145 companies.

The list is narrowed down for value. "A lot of investors want to own great companies, so they tend to trade at high valuations," Rakszawski said. "So the strategy tends to go toward those that are underpriced at any time."

The Morningstar analysts assign an "intrinsic value per share" for each eligible company, using a long-term discounted cash flow model. Then those values are compared with current stock prices as the index and the fund's portfolio are adjusted quarterly. The fund current holds 49 stocks.

An index such as the S&P 500 is weighted by market capitalization which means it is "rewarding success" as stocks of large-cap companies that soar can be weighted heavily. A typical equal-weighted approach to an index fund is meant to "allow smaller companies to participate," Rakszawski said. But MOAT's weighting approach is more about "allowing each stock to have its valuation dynamics play out for the portfolio," he said.

He summed up five sources of competitive advantages cited by the Morningstar analysts, as they assign economic moat ratings.

Switching cost — This benefits companies such as Salesforce.com Inc. CRM, +1.62%, which is held by MOAT currently. The cost of switching to another software provider includes the time spent making the decision, IT resources used to make the switch and retraining staff. It is typically easier not to make a move.
Intangible assets — These include intellectual property, brands, patents and government licenses. Rakszawski cited Starbucks Corp. SBUX, +2.77% as a company with a very strong brand. It is not currently held by MOAT. He also pointed to pharmaceutical companies "that can charge more" for patented brands.
Network effect — This is a competitive advantage that builds as a user base grows. "One of the more controversial holdings [of MOAT] is Meta, with its Facebook platform," Rakszawski said. Meta can benefit as its advertisers decide to spend more, based on increasing user traffic flowing from Facebook.
Cost advantage — "Morningstar looks at each company to see if they can keep their input costs lower, to realize higher margins or even to undercut competitors," Rakszawski said. He named Walmart Inc. WMT, +1.22%, an occasional holding of MOAT, as an example.
Efficient scale — Some markets are dominated by only one or two players. Examples include railroads, although MOAT holds none currently.
Don't miss: 11 stocks in the S&P 500 expected to form an exclusive growth club for investors
Saudi Arabia Joins Shanghai Cooperation Organization As It Embraces China
por Tyler Durden

Zero Hedge / 2023-04-01 16:3513
Saudi Arabia Joins Shanghai Cooperation Organization As It Embraces China
While the US continues to splinter and cannibalize itself as it turns into a third world country, China is expanding its zone of economic and military influence that covers virtually all global commodity producers as it prepares for the next stage in the Sino-US cold war.

On Wednesday, Saudi Arabia's cabinet approved a decision to join the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, as Riyadh builds a long-term partnership with China despite - or perhaps due to - US security concerns. Saudi Arabia has approved a memorandum on granting the kingdom the status of a dialogue partner in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), state news agency SPA said.

The SCO is a political and security union of countries spanning much of Eurasia, including China, India and Russia. Formed in 2001 by Russia, China and former Soviet states in Central Asia, the body has been expanded to include India and Pakistan, with a view to playing a bigger role as counterweight to Western influence in the region. Iran also signed documents for full membership last year.


Joining the SCO was discussed during a visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping to Saudi Arabia last December, sources told Reuters, adding that dialogue partner status will be a first step within the organization before granting the kingdom full membership in the mid-term.

The decision followed an announcement by Saudi Aramco which raised its multi-billion dollar investment in China on Tuesday, by finalizing a planned joint venture in northeast China and acquiring a stake in a privately controlled petrochemical group.

Participants of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit attend an extended-format meeting of heads of SCO member states in Samarkand, Uzbekistan
Riyadh's growing ties with Beijing have raised security concerns in Washington, its traditional ally but increasingly less so, especially following Biden's catastrophic attempts to force OPEC+ to boost oil production, an overture which backfired spectacularly and to global humiliation by the Biden admin.

Meanwhile, Washington says Chinese attempts to exert influence around the world will not change U.S. policy toward the Middle East, which of course is a lie.

Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states have voiced concern about what they see as a withdrawal from the region by main security guarantor the United States, and have moved to diversify partners, shifting their alliance to the biggest US challenger in the global arena. Washington says it will stay an active partner in the region.

Countries belonging to the organisation plan to hold a joint "counter-terrorism exercise" in Russia's Chelyabinsk region in August this year.

Tyler Durden Sat, 04/01/2023 - 11:00

March 31, 2023

Accessibility helpSkip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footer
Sign In
Subscribe
OPEN SIDE NAVIGATION MENU
MYFT
MENU
Financial Times
Sign In
Are banks on the edge of another 2008-style precipice?
Make sense of it all with an FT subscription.
Try the FT for €1
Opinion Markets InsightAdd to myFT
A shift in fund flows from Japan will be felt around the world
If policy of yield control is phased out under incoming BoJ head Kazuo Ueda, a flight from foreign markets may accelerate
BENJAMIN SHATILAdd to myFT

Kazuo Ueda, the incoming Bank of Japan governor, arrives at a time when Japan is selling overseas bonds at a record pace © FT Montage/Reuters
A shift in fund flows from Japan will be felt around the world on twitter (opens in a new window)
A shift in fund flows from Japan will be felt around the world on facebook (opens in a new window)
A shift in fund flows from Japan will be felt around the world on linkedin (opens in a new window)
A shift in fund flows from Japan will be felt around the world on whatsapp (opens in a new window)
Save
Benjamin Shatil FEBRUARY 20 2023
15
Print this page
Receive free Bank of Japan updates
We'll send you a myFT Daily Digest email rounding up the latest Bank of Japan news every morning.


The writer is senior economist and head of Japan FX Strategy at JPMorgan

It is little wonder that markets were scouring decade-old comments by Kazuo Ueda, the newly announced Bank of Japan governor. A relatively unknown academic outside of Japan who served on the central bank's board between 1998 and 2005, Ueda's nomination has prompted a rush to understand both the person and his profile.


But this risks missing the forest for the trees. The question to ask is not who, but rather why. Why has the administration of Prime Minister Fumio Kishida nominated a comparative outsider to lead the BoJ, breaking with a long-held tradition of rotating between appointments from the Ministry of Finance and from within the ranks of the bank itself?

Perhaps others did not want the job. Or perhaps Ueda offers a shot at a relatively clean break for monetary policy. If the legacy of ultra-easy Abenomics looms large in Japan, dismantling an increasingly convoluted patchwork of policies will require someone who, at the very least, was not their architect.

And this is probably the point. The central bank's ultra-loose policy is now on a somewhat pre-determined path — towards (if not quite through) the exit door. This view is gaining traction in Tokyo. In the face of decade-high national wage growth, broadening price pressures, and hastened by a dysfunctional bond market, the BoJ's policy of seeking to cap yields — known as yield curve control — is on its last legs.

It is not just the surprise announcement of Ueda as governor that points to more policy lurches on the horizon. Sharp shifts in Japanese investor portfolios are also flashing amber.


Japan sold overseas bonds at a record pace last year, with Tokyo's megabanks and insurance groups the drivers of close to ¥25tn ($186bn) in sales. That Japanese investors offloaded the equivalent of about $180bn of foreign bonds in a single year is itself material: Japan was a net seller in global debt markets in all but two months in 2022.

The fast and furious pace of Japanese selling continued through year-end. Data released this month suggested that Japanese investors were net sellers in about 70 per cent of major global bond markets in December, with the largest outflows coming from the US, Europe and Australia.


What explains Japan's rush to shed global debt? Expectations of higher-still foreign yields (and thus lower bond prices) and 2022's sharp sell-off in the yen have, of course, played a part.

Japanese investors have typically sold foreign bonds when the yen depreciated, when costs to hedge their foreign currency exposure rose, or when global yields were on an uptrend. Last year was no different. But what has changed is the sheer pace of Japanese selling.

That is a sign that domestic investors are eyeing a retreat from yield curve control. By liquidating their holdings of foreign bonds, they are keeping their powder dry in preparation for more attractive higher onshore yields. And so, if an Ueda-led BoJ continues to normalise policy, last year's sharp reorientation in Japanese investment allocations could persist.

Such an inflection in flows will have important longer-term implications for global market liquidity. The most significant of these is a sustained rotation in Japanese investor allocations from overseas bonds back to domestic debt, as Japanese debt eventually offers higher, and thus more attractive, yields.

Recommended

News in-depthBank of Japan
Bank of Japan gets 'ideas man' to chart tricky path from negative rates
How far would benchmark Japanese government bond yields need to rise to warrant the furious pace of the country's selling in global debt markets? Our estimates suggest that the current volume of selling would be consistent with onshore yields well above 1 per cent, or more than double the rate permitted by the BoJ at present.

If we are correct in judging that, under Ueda's watch, the BoJ will eventually tolerate a rise in benchmark yields towards this level, Japanese flight from foreign markets may accelerate. And a sustained reorientation in Japan's portfolio allocations will have important implications for those markets where Japanese exposure is highest.

It is tempting to assume this is most significant for the US Treasury market, where Japan is the largest single foreign holder. To be sure, we would not push back against the view that the spillover from any disorderly exit from YCC could be most imminently reflected in higher US yields.

But a longer-term retreat in Japanese flows could put pressure on other, smaller debt markets. Japanese investors hold market shares in the high-single to low-double digits in Australia, New Zealand and parts of western Europe. A shift in policy under Ueda will matter not just for Japan, but for pockets of global debt markets, too.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2023. All rights reserved.Reuse this content(opens in new window)CommentsJump to comments section
Latest on Bank of Japan
Banks
Japanese banks take post-SVB hit over bond fears
Japanese economy
Key measure of Japan inflation reaches highest level in 41 years
Central banks
Central banks announce dollar liquidity measures to ease banking crisis
Bank of Japan
Kuroda sticks to guns in last BoJ meeting after 'bazooka' decade
Markets InsightToby Nangle
Is this time different for Japanese government bonds?
ExplainerJapanese economy
How 3 everyday items tell the story of Japanese inflation
Bank of Japan
Ditching bond yield cap will be tricky task for new Bank of Japan governor
Follow the topics in this article
Benjamin Shatil
Add to myFT
Markets Insight
Add to myFT
Japanese government bonds
Add to myFT
Capital markets
Add to myFT
Japanese business & finance
Add to myFT
Comments
How easy or hard was it to use FT.com today?

feedback
Useful links
Support
Legal & Privacy
Services
Tools
Community & Events
More from the FT Group
Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2023. FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
The Financial Times and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice.
PRINT SUBSCRIBERS | SUBSCRIBE | LOGIN



BUSINESS / ECONOMY
Japan's trade deficit narrows sharply from record as imports slow

Containers at a shipping terminal in Yokohama | BLOOMBERG
BY ERICA YOKOYAMA AND YOSHIAKI NOHARA
BLOOMBERG

Mar 16, 2023
SHARE

Japan's trade deficit narrowed sharply in February from the previous month's record shortfall, as the impact from the lunar new year in China reversed, slowing imports and encouraging exports.

The trade gap shrank to ¥897.7 billion ($6.8 billion) from ¥3.5 trillion in January, the Finance Ministry reported Thursday, coming in below analyst forecasts. Imports rose 8.3% from a year ago, decelerating from the previous month on a slowdown in energy shipments. Exports climbed 6.5% as cars pushed up gains.

The reversal of impacts from January's lunar new year holidays meant that China was a lead cause behind the narrowing of Japan's trade deficit last month. But a jump in exports to the rest of the world also signaled a more solid recovery for the world's third largest economy, after it narrowly avoided a recession at the end of last year.

"China's PMI showed a recovery of production activity after the reversal of its 'zero-COVID' policy, likely boosting Japanese exports to China," said Yoshimasa Maruyama, chief market economist at SMBC Nikko Securities. "The Japanese economy is expected to continue its gradual recovery, with progress in the 'with-COVID' lifestyle, rebounding inbound demand, and easing supply restrictions."

Thursday's trade report showed exports to the U.S. was up 14.9% from the previous year, while those to Europe gained 18.6%, both gaining pace from the previous month. Shipments to China fell 10.9%, slowing from February's 17.1% decline.

"Looking ahead, we expect the trade deficit to hover around the same level in March, with exports hemmed in by a softer yen (a positive) and weaker external demand (a negative)," Bloomberg economist Yuki Masujima said.

Still, February saw the 19th consecutive month of trade deficit, highlighting Japan's long struggle to recover from the impact of COVID-19 amid a weaker yen and higher oil prices.

Economists also warn of multiple downside risks ahead, including uncertainty over the impact from global interest rates hikes as central banks continue to fight inflation around the world.

The outlook is further clouded by the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and a full-blown crisis brewing at Credit Suisse Group, with some of the world's biggest banks racing to shield their finances from the potential fallout.

KEYWORDS
CHINA, TRADE, JAPANESE ECONOMY, ECONOMIC INDICATORS


MORE FROM NEWS

Japan tightens chip gear exports as U.S. seeks to contain China
Tokyo's move follows months of lobbying by the U.S. to get Japan to join it in tightening shipments of semiconductor tools to China.


Japan to face 11 million worker shortfall by 2040, study finds

U.S. and Japan strike deal on supply of minerals for EV batteries

U.K. to join Indo-Pacific trade bloc in major post-Brexit pact

World Bank warns of 'lost decade' in global growth without bold policy shifts

Japanese model Jessica Michibata arrested for MDMA possession
Finally, a serious offer to take Putin off Russia's hands
Ex-president of Fukuoka inn with contaminated hot-spring water dies in apparent suicide
Os cassinos odeiam quando você faz isso (mas isso é legal)
BUZZDAILY WINNERS
Villas Prices In Leiria Might Be More Affordable Than You Think
VILLAS FOR SALE | SEARCH ADS
Já pensou ter uma casa com energia sustentável?
Com os painéis solares da Galp Solar pode gerar energia limpa, cuidar do meio ambiente e do futuro do planeta.
GALP SOLAR
Your subscription plan doesn't allow commenting. To learn more see our FAQ




WHAT'S TRENDING
EDITORS' PICKS
North Korean defectors are dying lonely deaths in wealthy South Korea

Japan makes renewed push to internationalize higher education

High schooler in Japan excluded from graduation ceremony for cornrow hairstyle

Kiribayama's victory raises possibility of historic double promotion

Japan to raise retirement age of civil servants April 1

PODCAST
DEEP DIVE

The Japanese Diet expels some GaaSyy

DEEP DIVE FEATURES
Pole dancing sheds seedy image to climb to new heights

Times are changing. New-school pole dancing studios are offering healthy exercise, artistic expression and wholesome fun for men, women and children.


SPECIAL SUPPLEMENTS









Read more
SUPPLEMENTS BINDER



Bridges by SMS
Global Insight
GMI Post
World Eye Reports

Return to The Japan Times top page
JT DIGITAL ARCHIVES
THE JAPAN TIMES ALPHA
STUDY IN JAPAN
JT FOR WOMEN
JT BOOKCLUB
JAPANESE SCHOOL DIRECTORY
THE JAPAN TIMES JOBS
SUBSCRIBE
NEWSLETTERS
EPAPER EDITION
NEWS
NATIONAL
WORLD
BUSINESS
ASIA PACIFIC
REFERENCE
COLUMNS
MULTIMEDIA
OPINION
EDITORIALS
COMMENTARY
CARTOONS
LIFE
TRAVEL
DIGITAL
FOOD & DRINK
ENVIRONMENT
STYLE & DESIGN
LANGUAGE
LIFESTYLE
PEOPLE
COLUMNS
MULTIMEDIA
COMMUNITY
VOICES
ISSUES
OUR LIVES
EVENT LISTINGS
HOW-TOS
COLUMNS
CULTURE
FILM
MUSIC
ART
STAGE
EVENTS
FESTIVALS
BOOKS
TV
COLUMNS
MULTIMEDIA
SPORTS
RUGBY
BASEBALL
SOCCER
BASKETBALL
SUMO
FIGURE SKATING
TENNIS
MORE SPORTS
COLUMNS
MULTIMEDIA
CITY GUIDE
RESTAURANTS
PLACES
ABOUT US CONTACT US WORK WITH US PRIVACY POLICY LINK POLICY REPUBLISHING FAQS ANNOUNCEMENTS PRESS SITEMAP ADVERTISE
THE JAPAN TIMES LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ECONOMY
Japan lags behind U.S., U.K. in curbing pandemic deficits
Rising interest rates pose risk for Tokyo as it struggles to scale back stimulus


Japan's massive debt burden could grow heavier as interest rates rise.   © Reuters
MARIKO KODAKI, Nikkei staff writer
March 29, 2023 06:27 JST
TOKYO -- Japan's parliament on Tuesday approved a record high budget for the 11th year in a row, falling behind other advanced economies in reducing deficits racked up at the height of the coronavirus pandemic.

The fiscal 2023 budget totals 114 trillion yen ($872 billion) in spending, 6.7 trillion yen more than the initial budget for fiscal 2022, which ends Friday.

The increase largely comes from 5 trillion yen in reserve funds set aside for COVID-19 response, inflation and the war in Ukraine. Before the pandemic, Japan's budgets used to only include around 500 billion yen in reserve funds.


After COVID began to spread worldwide in 2020, advanced economies went deeper into the red to fund their response. But Japan has been slow to wind down fiscal stimulus measures and return spending to normal.

According to research by UBS Group, Japan's primary deficit in 2022 equaled 5.6% of gross domestic product -- little changed from its pandemic peak of 6.3%, and placing it 25th out of 33 economies in terms of improvement.


Japan's Cabinet Office estimates a primary deficit of nearly 50 trillion yen across the national and regional governments for fiscal 2022.

Part of that shortfall comes from committing over 6 trillion yen to COVID employment subsidies for companies that put workers on leave instead of laying them off, a program that will end this month. While the subsidies helped sustain employment, critics say they discouraged the flow of workers to more productive areas of the economy. Meanwhile, expanded subsidies for hospitals that treat coronavirus patients will remain in place in April and beyond.

Other countries have made bigger strides in improving fiscal health. The U.K's deficit shrank to 5.8% of GDP from a peak of 13.4% after the country ended its pandemic job retention scheme in 2021. The U.S., which put together a roughly $2 trillion COVID-19 stimulus package, went to 5.1% from 13.9%.

Japan's challenge partly stems from having much of its COVID response morph into measures meant to ease the pain of inflation. On Tuesday, the government decided to spend around 2 trillion yen from its fiscal 2022 reserves to help large corporations with energy bills. 

In addition to the main budgets, Japan has passed supplementary budgets totaling around 140 trillion yen over the past three years.

"Massive spending has become normal, and we're having trouble putting the lid back on," said Takahide Kiuchi at the Nomura Research Institute.

Amid a global rise in interest rates, "Japan should be thinking about fiscal policy under the assumption that long rates could top 1% in the medium-term as well," said Koya Miyamae at SMBC Nikko Securities.

Japan faces some of the largest fiscal challenges in the world. The ratio of national and local government debt to GDP was 262% in 2021, surpassing Greece and Italy.

The Finance Ministry estimates that if government bond interest rates for all maturities increase 1 percentage point over baseline assumptions, national debt servicing costs for fiscal 2026 will be 33.4 trillion yen, 8 trillion yen higher than in the budget for fiscal 2023.

Meanwhile, the government plans a major increase in defense spending over the five years through fiscal 2027 but has yet to secure all of the funding. Nor have the finances been secured for the proposed doubling of measures to counter the declining birthrate.



READ NEXT
Inflation
Japan to spend additional $15bn to ease inflation pain
Coronavirus
COVID patients in Japan to foot more costs after downgrade
Bonds
Japan banks' AT1 yields steady week after Credit Suisse rescue
Finance
Japan Finance Ministry gives rare nudge to BOJ amid bond worries
Property
Japan real estate sees signs of global investors shying away
Economy
U.S. bank turmoil reflects blatant failure by the Fed, expert says
Opinion
Crumbling Western banks will be new worry for Ueda at BOJ
Books
Book review: The funny business of central banks and money supply
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE

Travel & Leisure
Thai school uniform boom in China fuels hope for tourism…

Companies
Jack Ma makes surprise China return after lengthy travels…

Finance
Philippines President Marcos aims to merge two state banks
LATEST ON ECONOMY
Economy
China factory owners feel pain of stumbling post-COVID recovery
Economy
China only bright spot as World Bank cuts ASEAN growth outlook
Economy
China Premier Li pledges opening up to world amid U.S. tensions
SPONSORED CONTENT





About Sponsored Content
DISCOVER THE ALL NEW
NIKKEI ASIA APP

GET INSIGHTS ON ASIA IN YOUR INBOX
Register for our newsletters
About UsContact UsSitemapHelpTerms Of UseCopyrightPrivacy & Cookie PolicyAdvertising
Nikkei Inc. No reproduction without permission.

March 29, 2023

Accessibility helpSkip to navigationSkip to contentSkip to footer
Sign In
Subscribe
OPEN SIDE NAVIGATION MENU
MYFT
MENU
Financial Times
Sign In
Are banks on the edge of another 2008-style precipice?
Make sense of it all with an FT subscription.
Subscribe now
HTSI FashionAdd to myFT
The Zara woman: an exclusive interview with Marta Ortega Pérez
The non-executive chair of Inditex talks succession, sustainability and sales
Inditex non-executive chair Marta Ortega Pérez © David Sims
The Zara woman: an exclusive interview with Marta Ortega Pérez on twitter (opens in a new window)
The Zara woman: an exclusive interview with Marta Ortega Pérez on facebook (opens in a new window)
The Zara woman: an exclusive interview with Marta Ortega Pérez on linkedin (opens in a new window)
The Zara woman: an exclusive interview with Marta Ortega Pérez on whatsapp (opens in a new window)
Save
Jo Ellison. Photography by David Sims. Styling by Karl Templer 16 HOURS AGO
37
Print this page
Receive free Fashion updates
We'll send you a myFT Daily Digest email rounding up the latest Fashion news every morning.


Sometimes power transfers happen slowly – less a regime change than the steady accretion of quiet power. I got the sense something had happened about 18 months ago in Paris. It was during the spring-summer season of collections, and a week of parties in a rare pandemic lull. Charlotte Gainsbourg was launching a denim collaboration with Zara, hosting an evening at Hôtel Particulier Solférino in Saint-Germain. Another cocktail evening during shows, we shrugged, but went along to check things out. Here, in dusky candlelight, stood the nexus of the fashion industry. Photographers – Inez & Vinoodh, Craig McDean and David Sims – chatted to models, editors and stylists associated with the world's most esteemed newspapers and magazines. The room had a rare intoxicating quality, the sense that everyone was here.

The event wasn't hosted by Anna Wintour. This was no big advertiser event. The centre of the party gravitated around a chic, rather grave-looking thirtysomething woman with a choppy bob and heavy brows. Her name was Marta Ortega Pérez, the daughter of the Inditex and Zara co-founder, Amancio Ortega Gaona, whose personal wealth is estimated to be around $77.7bn. This charismatic yet soft-spoken host was tipped as heir to his retail dynasty.

A few weeks later, it was announced that Ortega Pérez would become the new non-executive chair at Inditex, starting in April 2022. Not everyone was happy. Twice married, and best known via party pictures in the Spanish tabloids, Ortega Pérez had been dismissed frequently by the chauvinistic media as being a showjumping socialite. There were further wobbles when it was discovered that she would be arriving with Óscar Garcia Maceiras, a new and largely unknown CEO. The market was wary of the lawyer who would replace Carlos Crespo, who had served as CEO since 2019.

But no one in the company was ruffled. Marta Ortega Pérez's path was mapped a long, long time ago. Speaking to his biographer in The Man from Zara, first published in 2008, Amancio Ortega Gaona said of his daughter: "What gives me a great deal of peace of mind is that we've managed to make it to the second generation almost without anybody noticing… The problem of succession is settled, because everything has been delegated."


"It's a different generation and a different time," says Ortega Pérez of her father's legacy © David Sims
Family is huge at Inditex. It's like Succession but with friendly Spanish people, delicious food and better clothes. "When I was a kid, my mum was doing the women's collections for Zara," says Ortega Pérez of her first consciousness of the business. We are eating lunch at the Inditex headquarters, following an extensive, multi-department Zara tour. In person she is friendly, fun and courteous; she's also striking-looking in the flesh. She speaks quickly and confidently in English in a low and throaty voice. "Obviously, my father was working most of the time. But also my mum has two sisters and four brothers. And all my mum's family work in the company...So we talked about the company a lot."

Ortega Pérez started working officially at Inditex 16 years ago although, arguably, she was in the business from the womb. Born in 1984, she is the only daughter of Flora Pérez, the second wife of Amancio, who was still married to Rosalia Mera, his Zara co-founder, at the time. Today, Flora Pérez represents the family's 60 per cent share on the board. Many family members are still involved. Óscar Pérez Marcote is Zara's managing director; another uncle, Jorge Pérez Marcote, is the managing director of Massimo Dutti. Ortega Pérez's second husband, Carlos Torretta, a cute, pony-tailed former model agent and golf fanatic, is the head of communication at Zara (she has one child with him, and one with her ex-husband, Sergio Álvarez Moya, whom she divorced in 2015). Her half-sister Sandra Ortega Mera has no part in the Inditex management, but acceded €6.3bn on her mother's death in 2013.

The headquarters are far removed from the world of fashion in a huge glass complex in Arteixo, near the city of A Coruña on the north-west tip of Galicia. Its near neighbour is the shipping-forecast outpost Finisterre. Inditex is a colossus among retailers; its apparel and footwear enjoys a global market share of 1.6 per cent. In the full-year 2022 results published on 15 March, sales reached €32.6bn (up 17.5 per cent on 2021). The group comprises seven brands, including Pull&Bear and Bershka, of which Zara, the largest, accounts for 73 per cent of sales. As an employer, it's the city's lifeblood: in 2017, Inditex overtook fishing as the region's main driver of GDP.

We have a culture of belonging [at Zara]. It's always been that way

The tour takes in every department, from the pattern cutters to the design studios, and from the logistics teams to the in-house studio, which is popping with multiple ecommerce shoots. There are no obvious signs of office hierarchy: Ortega Pérez's desk, on a bank of white elevated tables in the middle of the women's design team, is distinctive only for a vase of wilting flowers. The atmosphere is easy and convivial. Ortega Pérez talks conspiratorially with colleagues, many of whom have worked in the business for several decades. One is only reminded that this is a multibillion-dollar company via the giant monitors in the design studio showing a blinking grid of global sales.

"I always like when people come to visit," says Ortega Pérez, "because it's impossible to know what Zara is without actually seeing how it works from the inside. It sounds like such a big company, but on the day-to-day it really doesn't feel like that. We have a culture of belonging. It's always been that way."

It's a culture that was encouraged by her father, who, like her, spent his days working on the proverbial factory floor. Now 87, he still spends a lot of time in office, and speaks to Ortega Pérez almost every day. "My father," she says, "is the best at getting the best out of everyone… And I think that is the key, because obviously no one is good at everything."

Ortega Pérez is pretty clear about the things she is good at. "I don't enjoy numbers very much in general," she confesses. "Obviously, with the years, you get to know it." But product is her job. "My energy is on the product and how that's presented – that's the soul of our company and where I can deliver the most value. I'm aware of the financials, but I have a very seasoned team close to me who are entirely focused on them. We try to behave like a small company and not get distracted by big numbers. The commercial success comes, I believe, from the focus on the small details by every single person in the company."

Under her supervision, the product has undergone small but subtle improvements. She has brought in design collaborators such as Charlotte Gainsbourg and the model Kaia Gerber, done a jewellery range with Elie Top and last year invited the designer Narciso Rodriguez to reproduce 25 pieces from his archive. Under her watch, the clothes have become more consistently desirable. The accessories and shoes are much improved. She is working with an exceptional calibre of stylists, models and photographers to produce an indefatigable feed of slick campaigns.

"Marta lives and breathes her work," says Karl Templer, the British fashion stylist and creative director, who works with Ortega Pérez on the biannual Studio collections for women, men and children and other special projects too. "She is very intuitive and makes decisions quickly. She always wants to do even better and is looking forward to what could be next."

Vincent Van Duysen has worked with Ortega Pérez on a namesake range for Zara Home. "Marta flew in with some of the team four years ago," says the Belgian designer and architect. "At the beginning I didn't think she was proposing a collaboration. I thought it was more privately related, that I should do a house with her. But she wanted to know if I was willing to design furniture: to upgrade the offering in a collection under the art direction of Fabien Baron. I didn't have to think that long. And it wasn't about the big cheque. For me, it was the way they expose the brand in terms of marketing, the website, the story of the brand."

Of Ortega Pérez, Van Duysen is expansive. "Marta is not only generous and caring, she's also a great entrepreneur. She's meticulous. She has an eye – for appearance and art. And she's down to earth."


"In short my goal is to maintain and keep building quality, quality, quality in every aspect of the company"


Ortega Pérez took over as non-executive chair of Inditex in 2022 © David Sims
Many speak of the company's family ethos and how welcoming they are. The money can't hurt either: one model who shoots ecommerce in A Coruña tells me the day rate is so good it would be a "criminal injustice" to turn it down. Although the brand has never done traditional advertising, Ortega Pérez has brought in talents who have helped elevate the house aesthetic to that of a luxury brand. Except, of course, Inditex isn't luxury. The average cost of a checkout basket at Zara is €70, and €50-€60 at Bershka or Pull&Bear.

Amancio Ortega Gaona never intended Inditex to be luxury. He wanted his wares to democratise the market, not the other way around. And despite the high-low collaborations, neither is Ortega Pérez moving away from this core belief. "It does feel as though they're moving towards elevating the product," says Richard Chamberlain, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets. "They've been willing to entertain external collaborations in niche areas. And they have been generally premiumising and enhancing the brand. But if you look at the price points, they've become more competitive," he says. "Which speaks to their scale and their buying power. There's very little markdown because they start each season with less inventory commitment. And they've become more cost- and eco-efficient. The use of RFID [the microchip technology that has streamlined orders, stock and distribution] has enabled them to manage inventory better, ship more from store and drive full-price sales."

At a time when consumers are more price-sensitive than ever, Ortega Pérez is well aware of competitors such as Shein. But she is reluctant to draw parallels between Inditex and the Chinese fast-fashion giant. "Fast fashion suggests a compromise to quality, which is completely the opposite of what we look for," she says. "More than 40 per cent of the people that work in the team are just dedicated to the product. We have more than 250 designers at Zara, the same with pattern-makers. We still do the patterns. We do fittings on real models."

We have more than 250 designers at Zara – we still do the patterns. We do fittings on real models

The question of sustainability is a key one, especially at a company producing such enormous volumes (Zara alone produces about 450 million garments annually, with 20,000 new styles each year). At the end of FY2022, Inditex operated 5,815 stores in 213 markets. And while the group is proud that 50 per cent of its product is sourced from proximity countries – Spain, Portugal, Morocco and Turkey (the rest is sourced from Asia) – a report by Société Générale in 2022 estimated that less than 20 per cent of Inditex product had any contact with their manufacturing facilities.

"We don't recognise ourselves in what they call 'fast fashion'," repeats Ortega, who strays from the dictionary definition of the words. "Because that brings to mind the amount of unsold items and poor-quality clothes focused on a very cheap price, and that cannot be further from what we do. On the other hand, we have a business model that is focused mainly on customer demand, so we react to that. We supply and distribute with that mentality, so that really helps us minimise the residual stock that we have, which is tiny – less than two per cent."


Amancio Ortega Gaona embracing Ortega Pérez, 2011 © Europa Press/Getty Images

Ortega Pérez with her husband Carlos Torretta at Mercedes Benz Fashion Week Madrid, 2020 © Giovanni Sanvido/Getty Images
"If you're dropping new collections dozens of times a year, you're a fast fashion brand whether you recognise it or not," counters Rachel Arthur, the writer and sustainability consultant who has advised businesses including Google, the United Nations Environment Programme and the British Fashion Council's Institute of Positive Fashion. "Fashion as we know it is built on resource extraction and exploitation, meaning it has an enormously detrimental impact on both the planet and people. The fact is, if we don't look at volume (as an industry) we can't meet any of the sustainability targets we've set."

Inditex launched a sustainability strategy in 2001 when it became a signatory of the United Nations Global Compact and published a first Sustainability Strategic Plan. In 2002, it joined the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. By the end of this year, 100 per cent of its cotton and manmade cellulosic fibres will be from preferred sources – such as organic, recycled, BC (Better Cotton) or next-gen cotton – and it will have reached zero waste across all its facilities. By 2040 the company aims to have reached net zero emissions across the entire value chain. In November, it launched a pre-owned service, Zara's first (and at first unprofitable) step into resale or repair. The brand started installing clothing-donation bins in store from 2016.

"They regularly come up as highly ranked in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index," says Chamberlain of Inditex's record. "They're leading the way."

But while Arthur agrees that these efforts are commendable, there is still a long, long way to go. "Having a sustainability strategy in place with the sort of targets Zara has is absolutely imperative, and as an organisation it is demonstrating the sort of transformational thinking that is possible. But even sustainable garments still have an impact when we're talking about billions of them a year."


"Fast fashion brings to mind unsold items and poor-quality clothes focused on a very cheap price, and that cannot be further from what we do"


Ortega Pérez took over as non-executive chair of Inditex in 2022 © David Sims
Having inherited a robust business, Ortega Pérez's mission now could simply be to steer a steady ship. There has been a push into new categories – such as beauty and lingerie – but she denies these decisions are all part of some bigger plan. "It might sound that it's not possible, in such a big company, that we don't plan a big strategy. Rather I go by the feeling and try to judge things more intuitively."

Pushed to be more specific about her vision, Ortega Pérez offers a list: "My focus is entirely on the product and everything that empowers the best possible delivery of that; and always improving shopping experience, both in the physical stores and online, and maximising integration between the two. And building on our sustainability work, which is more and more integrated in each and every process in the company, as well as influencing and sharing best practice with the industry at large. In short, my goal is to maintain and keep building quality, quality, quality in every aspect of the company."

As the mother of a 10-year-old son and three-year-old daughter, Ortega Pérez is watching her children's interest in fashion. "He's totally obsessed with clothes and labels," she tells me bemusedly of her son's enthusiasm for labels, which far exceeds her own desire for clothes. "I mostly wear Zara or Massimo Dutti," she says of her own wardrobe, which today consists of a simple grey wool tunic dress. "But I do buy designer clothes… And then, obviously, I like shoes."

She tends to wear simple silhouettes and neutrals, and "loves dresses", although I can't imagine her wearing the famous Zara dresses so ubiquitous they get their own hashtags each year. For her wedding to Torretta, in 2018, she wore high-necked Valentino haute couture. "I have a mix," she says of the high-low blend of designer and high-street clothing that makes up the modern professional wardrobe. "And I also have things from my mum. So, yes, it has become a big wardrobe. My son says, 'Why do you have so much clothes?' I'm like, because I've had them for many years."

Ortega Pérez seems to be relatively comfortable with the visibility that comes with being the main player at a huge, publicly listed brand. A great deal more so than her father: "Well, everyone is more outgoing than him," she snorts when I ask her about the role. "I'm not comfortable with being the centre of attention, it's not something I enjoy, but I like going to… not fashion parties, but I go to events that are related with my work."


Marta Ortega Pérez photographed in London © David Sims
Her father is almost pathologically private – he only ever did one official interview. "But it's a different time, too, than when my father started," says Ortega Pérez. "And I guess I'm more in the fashion world than he ever was. So it's a different generation and a different time."

Intentionally or otherwise, Ortega Pérez is shifting focus at the brand. She's engaging with the industry in a far more transparent way. Rather than working in relative anonymity in Galicia like her father, she's put it on the map: whether that's inviting dozens of supermodels and editors to a Steven Meisel exhibition in A Coruña's harbour, as she did last November, or asking a design luminary such as Vincent Van Duysen to create a line of furniture to decorate our homes. Following the first financial bumps after her appointment, she and Óscar have allayed their critics' fears. Inditex reported a gross profit increase of 17 per cent for 2022, as sales exceeded pre-pandemic levels in the first full year of her role as chair.

Recommended

InterviewPablo Isla
Former Inditex boss Pablo Isla: 'Whatever I do, I think about doing it indefinitely'
I wonder if, as a former competitive showjumper, her experience with horses has taught her any business skills. "The thing with showjumping is most of the time it takes so much work, and when you actually compete, it's a two-minute thing. And most of the time you lose. So I think you learn that you have to keep on trying and working hard to achieve goals. You learn about teamwork. Because even while showjumping is an individual event, you have such a team around you that makes it possible. And it's very long-term, because the time you spend from starting with a horse till he is ready to compete, it takes a while."

Patience, adaptability and teamwork, then? She nods in that serious, considered way of hers. "I think that it's something that can be applied not only for work, but for life in general, I guess."

Hair, Anthony Turner. Make-up, Lucia Pieroni. Manicure, Ama Quashie. Set design, Poppy Bartlett. Production, Erin Fee Productions. Post-production, SKN-LAB

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2023. All rights reserved.Reuse this content(opens in new window)CommentsJump to comments section
Latest on Fashion
Anna Berkeley
Ask a Stylist: spring knits and how to style them
FT Swamp Notes
Building The Post-Neoliberal World Premium content
Fashion
With slouchy men's trousers, a little leg goes a long way
Special ReportWatches and Jewellery: March
Sewing Bee's Esme Young on a lifetime of statement necklaces
Special ReportWatches and Jewellery: March
Luxury brands to capitalise on coronation jubilation
Anna Berkeley
How to dress for your first job
Style
Rowing Blazers expands its preppy portfolio with Chipp
Follow the topics in this article
Menswear
Add to myFT
Womenswear
Add to myFT
Style
Add to myFT
Fashion
Add to myFT
HTSI
Add to myFT
Comments
How easy or hard was it to use FT.com today?

feedback
Useful links
Support
Legal & Privacy
Services
Tools
Community & Events
More from the FT Group
Markets data delayed by at least 15 minutes. © THE FINANCIAL TIMES LTD 2023. FT and 'Financial Times' are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
The Financial Times and its journalism are subject to a self-regulation regime under the FT Editorial Code of Practice.

Want to know more?

Must have books!!!